1 / 21

Physics 430: Lecture 3 Linear Air Resistance

Physics 430: Lecture 3 Linear Air Resistance. Dale E. Gary NJIT Physics Department. 2.1 Air Resistance.

obelia
Télécharger la présentation

Physics 430: Lecture 3 Linear Air Resistance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Physics 430: Lecture 3 Linear Air Resistance Dale E. Gary NJIT Physics Department

  2. 2.1 Air Resistance • When a projectile moves through the air (or other medium—such as gas or liquid), it experiences a drag force, which depends on velocity and acts in the direction opposite the motion (i.e. it always acts to slow the projectile). • Quite generally, we can write this force as , where the function f(v) can in general be any function of velocity. • At relatively slow speeds, it is often a good approximation to write where flin and fquad stand for the linear and quadratic terms, respectively: • The physical reasons for these two different terms are as follows: • The linear term arises due to the viscous drag of the medium, and is proportional to the viscosity of the medium and the linear size D of the projectile. • The quadratic term arises from the projectile’s having to accelerate the mass of air with which it is continually colliding, and is proportional to the density of the medium and the cross-sectional area D2 of the projectile. As an aside, we introduce the Taylor Series expansion (see inside front cover of the text). Any functionf(x) can be expanded about the point x = a by f(x) = f(a) + f’(a)(x - a) + 1/2! f’’(a)(x - a)2 + 1/3! f’’’(a)(x - a)3 + … Therefore, expanding f(v) about v = 0 gives f(v) = f(0) + f’(0)v + f’’(0)v2 + … Since the force f(0) = 0, the above expression for f(v) can be seen as just an expansion of the drag force into its leading terms.

  3. 2.1 Air Resistance, cont’d • It is convenient to have parameters that do not depend on the projectile’s size or area, but rather on intrinsic properties of the medium. We therefore write • For a spherical projectile in air at STP (Standard Temperature and Pressure), for example, the approximate values of b and g are: • Although these values are only strictly valid for a sphere in air at STP, nevertheless they give a good idea of the relative importance of the linear and quadratic force terms even for non-spherical bodies moving through gases other than air. • When it comes time to do problems with air resistance, we are going to want to neglect one or the other of these terms. We can tell their relative importance by looking at the ratio

  4. Example 2.1 • A Baseball and Some Drops of Liquid • Assess the relative importance of the linear and quadratic drag forces on a baseball of diameter D = 7 cm , traveling at a modest v = 5 m/s. Do the same for a drop of rain (D = 1 mm and v = 0.6 m/s) and for a tiny droplet of oil used in the Millikan oildrop experiment (D = 1.5 mm and v = 5x10-5 m/s). • Baseball shows that flin is completely negligible for a baseball. Use • Rain shows that both are needed. Must use full expression • Oil Drop shows that fquad is completely negligible for the oil drop. Use

  5. Linear vs. Quadratic Drag • The moral of the previous example is clear. There are some objects for which the linear drag force dominates—namely very small liquid drops in air, or somewhat larger objects in a very viscous liquid (e.g. a ball bearing in molasses). • For most projectiles we will meet, however, including baseballs, cannon balls, even humans in free-fall, the appropriate drag force to use is the quadratic one. • This is unfortunate, since the linear drag force is much easier to solve mathematically, and we will start with linear case because it is easier, and it allows us to introduce some useful mathematics. • There is a branch of physics called Fluid Mechanics that makes use of a dimensionless number called the Reynolds number, which is closely related to the ratio fquad/flin. It is R = Dvr/h, where r is the gas or fluid density and h is the viscosity (see Problem 2.3). When the Reynolds number is large, the quadratic term is important, and when the Reynolds number is small, the linear term is important.

  6. v x flin=-bv y mg 2.2 Linear Air Resistance • Let’s put the linear and quadratic drag forces into Newton’s 2nd Law to see what the character of the solutions are. As always, we write Newton’s 2nd Law as the equation of motion: • For a projectile with linear drag, the projectile experiences both gravity and the drag force, the latter directed in the opposite direction of its motion. Newton’s 2nd Law becomes • But , so we can write this as a first-order differential equation for v: • This vector equation represents (in two dimensions) two separate equations for the x and y components • Notice that the two equations do not depend on one another.

  7. v x mg y Contrast with Quadratic Air Resistance • For a projectile with quadratic drag, the situation is not so simple: • But since , . We can also write v via the Pythagorean Theorem • When separated into its two equations for x and y components • Now these two equations do depend on one another—they are coupled equations. That makes them considerably harder to solve, which is why we are going to start with the simpler, linear drag case. • Let’s go back to the linear case and solve the horizontal and vertical equations separately. First the horizontal case.

  8. v flin=-bv Horizontal Motion with Linear Drag-1 • Consider an object such as the cart in the figure, coasting horizontally in a linearly resistive medium. Now gravity is not important, so we can deal with the equation for the x component alone. • We solved this first-order differential equation in Lecture 1 (Problem 1.24). To refresh your memory, we write • Then integrate both sides to get where c is an arbitrary constant of integration. Taking the inverse log of both sides, and writing b/m = k, we have where the arbitrary constant of integration has morphed into v = vxo at t = 0.

  9. Horizontal Motion with Linear Drag-2 • All the solution says is that the cart starting out with some velocity vxo slows down exponentially, approaching zero velocity only after infinite time has passed. • Since the argument of the exponential must have no units, the units of the constant k must be inverse time, so 1/k can be considered a time constant • The solution is an equation for velocity. To find the equation for the position of the cart, we just integrate. The left side is • Here we assume that the position at t = 0 is x(0) = 0. The right side is • The final solution for the position is where we have introduced the parameter , the value of x as .

  10. Horizontal Motion with Linear Drag-3 • The final solutions for v(t) and x(t) are: • Graphs of these functions are: Make your own cart in Phun and try it with/without air resistance. This behavior should certainly not be surprising. But hopefully this helps you get an appreciation for the power of mathematics for describing physical behavior.

  11. v flin=-bv mg Vertical Motion with Linear Drag-1 • Let’s now consider the equation we derived for vertical (y-direction) motion. • In this case, because of the opposite directions of the forces, you can see that if vy is small, gravity will dominate and the projectile will accelerate downward, making the drag force grow until eventually it equals the gravity force. At that point, the net force goes to zero and the projectile falls with a constant terminal speedvter given by: • Looking at the dependence of the terminal speed, you can see that a more massive object has a larger terminal speed. Conversely, if air resistance is great (value of b is large), the terminal speed is small.

  12. Example 2.2—Terminal Speed of Small Liquid Drops • Statement of the problem: • Find the terminal speed of a tiny oildrop in the Millikan oildrop experiment (diameter D = 1.5 mm and density r = 840 kg/m3). Do the same for a small drop of mist with diameter D = 0.2 mm. • Solution: • To calculate the terminal speed , we need the mass of the drop. However, we are only given the density and size, from which we have to calculate the mass. • The terminal speed is then • Putting in numbers for the oil drop, we get and for the drop of mist where we have used the previous value for beta More massive drops fall faster

  13. Vertical Motion with Linear Drag-2 • Writing the original equation in terms of vter, we have which is again a first-order differential equation which is not so different from the one for horizontal motion. • We can most easily see this by making a change of variable and writing • Then our equation becomes , which is identical to our old equation for vx: , with the same solution: . • When we put back the original variable, and again use t = 1/k, this becomes: • To determine the integration constant A, as usual we need initial conditions. If the projectile starts with velocity vy = vyo at t = 0, then , so • As , as before (and as we expect).

  14. A word about the “characteristic time” t. Note that by the time t = t, the projectile has already reached By the time t = 3t, the projectile velocity is at 95% of vter. • Note that it is not enough to simply derive an equation. To really understand the motion you need to sketch such plots, or look at limiting behavior (e.g. position and velocity as ). Vertical Motion with Linear Drag-3 • Let’s take a look at the solution for vyo = 0 (dropping the projectile from rest). In this case, the equation is just which is plotted below.

  15. Example 2.3—Characteristic Time for Two Liquid Drops • Statement of the problem: • Find the characteristic times, t, for the oildrop and drop of mist in Example 2.2. • Solution: • The characteristic time was defined as t = m/b, while vter = mg/b, so we have the useful relation: • This can be interpreted as saying that vter is the velocity the drop would attain if it were accelerated for a time, t, at constant acceleration equal to g. In fact, the acceleration is less than g, because of the variable drag force acting in the opposing direction, so the drop does not quite attain speed vter after time t. • For the Milliken oildrop, we found that , so • After falling only 20 ms, the oildrop attains 95% of its terminal speed! • For the drop of mist, the characteristic time is 0.13 s. After about 0.4 s, the drop should have attained 95% of its terminal speed.

  16. Vertical Motion with Linear Drag-4 • We have obtained the general equation for the velocity as • To get the projectile’s position, we need to integrate this equation to get where we have assumed the initial position y(0) = 0. • We now have the equations for the projectile position for horizontal and vertical motion, separately, as: for x(0) = y(0) = 0, and y downward.

  17. y no air drag R vxot Rvac x air drag 2.3 Trajectory and Range in a Linear Medium • To get a trajectory including BOTH horizontal and vertical motion, we should consider y position upward. The corresponding equation for y(t) is the same as before, but we must reverse the sign of vter (convince yourself that is the case). Thus, our two equations are: • We can combine these into a single equation by solving the first for t and substituting into the second: • This is rather too complicated to understand easily, but here is a plot of the trajectory compared with one without air resistance.

  18. Horizontal Range-1 • You have already seen the method for finding the range of a trajectory without air resistance, in Physics I. To remind you of the solution, it is • What is it in the case of linear air resistance? Recall that the range R is the value of x when y as given by the range equation is zero: • This is a transcendental equation (because of the ln term) and cannot be solved in terms of elementary functions. You need to use a computer to solve it numerically (which you will do for the homework). Meanwhile, you can solve it approximately by assuming the argument of the ln function is small. • To do this, you can use a Taylor expansion as we did earlier (and which you will also do in the HW): where

  19. Horizontal Range-2 • We can now substitute this approximation of the ln term into the range equation to get: • We can simplify this by noting that the second term in the first bracket cancels the first term in the second bracket, and after factoring out a common R, • We can simplify further by recalling that vter/t = g, and dividing by : • Right away we see that R = 0 is a solution, but not an interesting one, hence we have

  20. Horizontal Range-3 • The text goes through a rather unilluminating argument that for small enough air resistance the range R  Rvac, hence we can get away with substituting for R2, and finally get: • This is only valid for low air resistance (v << vter). • Example 2.4: • I flick a tiny metal pellet with diameter D = 0.2 mm and v = 1 m/s at 45o. Find its horizontal range assuming the pellet is gold (density r = 16 g/cm3). What if it is aluminum (density r = 2.7 g/cm3)? • Solution: • Without air resistance, both pellets would have the same range:

  21. Example 2.4, Solution, Cont’d • Recall from example 2.2 that the terminal speed in air is given by • Thus, the range correction term is and the range is about 5% less than in vacuum. • The density of aluminum is about 6 times smaller, so the terminal velocity is likewise 6 times smaller so the correction is more like 30%. • Thus, the gold pellet will sail about 9.6 cm while the aluminum pellet will only go about 7 cm. Because the air resistance for aluminum is larger, we can expect that the equation for the range is not so accurate.

More Related