360 likes | 474 Vues
This presentation, delivered by Ran Berenfeld on May 10, 2005, explores the Max-Cut problem within complete, undirected graphs. It introduces the Goemans-Williamson algorithm and outlines the use of semi-definite programming (SDP) as a powerful tool for approximation. Key topics include the NP-Hard nature of Max-Cut, the translation of the problem into quadratic programming, and the implications of the approximation ratio derived from solutions. Additionally, it discusses potential applications of SDP in related problems, offering an overview of methods and results in this domain.
E N D
Semi-Definite Algorithm for Max-CUT Ran Berenfeld May 10,2005
Agenda : • The Max-Cut problem. • Goemans-Williamson algorithm. • Semi-Definite programming. • Other applications.
The Max-Cut Problem : Let be a complete, undirected graph, With edge weights . Find a cut that maximizes
Observations : • General definition • set weight=1 if edges are un-weighted. • set weight=0 for non complete graph. • NP-Hard [Karp 72’] • approximation is easy. • This presentation – [Goemans-Williamson 94’]shows -approximation where • [Karloff ’99, Feige-Schechtman ’99] – Goemans Williamson have an integralitty gap of
GW strategy for Max-Cut • 1.Write problem as a Quadratic Problem. (with integer solutions) • 2.Relax to vector programming. • 3.Vector programming is equal to semi-definite programming (SDP). • 4.Solve SDP. Graph QP VP Approx SDP
Graph QP • Assign a variable to each vertex. • Let for vertices in • Let for vertices in
QP Approx VP • Replace each with . • Old objective value is achieved setting • where • where
QP Approx VP • Motivation : heavy weighted verticeswill be “far” away from each other. 1000
VP SDP • we’ll show later that VP is equal to SDP.
SDP • we’ll also show later how SDP is polynomial time solvable to any accuracy degree. • But first lets analyze the approximation ratio.
SDP • Suppose are the vectors solution to our VP. • To obtain a cut from the solution : Randomly pick a vector on the unit sphere, and let
Approximation Analysis : • Let and be vectors in the VP solution. • By the choice of it follows that • Pr[the edge is in the cut]= • Pr[ ] • And so the expected weight of the cut produced by the algorithm is :
If the angle between and is , there is an area of size where can satisfy
Current conclusion : • The optimal solution to VP is no less then the optimal cut. So it follows : • Now we set • And obtain : !
OPT 0 1 • QP solutions and the optimal solution OPT-F 0 1 • VP feasible solution and fractional OPT OPT-F 0 1 • Find integral solution of cost QP SDP • Integralitty gap :
SDP • A real, symmetric matrix is positive semi-definite if (TFAE) : • 1. for all x. • 2.all eigenvalues of are non negative. • 3.there exist a matrix so that . • Notations: means is positive semi • Definite. • is the convex of all symmetric • Matrices.
SDP • Define (Frobenius product) : • . • Then SDP in general form is : • Where and all ‘s are symmetric.
VP SDP • 1.Replace with . • 2.Demand that the matrix be • Symmetric and positive semi-definite. • It follows that both problems (VP and SDP) are equal.
SDP • It’s easy to show that SDP can be solved in polynomial time using the Ellipsoid method. • Other methods exists that are much more practical…
SDP • The Ellipsoid method • A convex set in is described using a set of restrictions • We need to find a point in the set. • We need to be able, for each point • To provide a separating hyperplane • (in polynomial time)
SDP • The Ellipsoid method • The method starts with a large ellipsoid containing . • At each step, if the current point is not in ,we use the separating hyperplane to find a (significantlly) smaller ellipsoid.
SDP • The SDP Problem : • We treat the matrix as a vector in . • The set of symmetric ,positive • Semi-definite matrices is convex. • It follows the set of feasible solution is • convex.
SDP • The SDP Problem : • Finding a separating hyperplane : • If is not symmetric, is a S.H • If is not positive semi-definite, it has a • Negative eigenvalue. Let be the • Eigenvector. Then • Is a separating H.P. • Any constraint violated is a S.H
SDP • The SDP Problem : • Finally, the SDP for Max-Cut has a well • defined Dual problem. Which is another • SDP program with the same objective • Value. • Intersecting the Primal and Dual program • Creates a convex set, which is not empty • If the program is feasible, and contains • only optimal points.
1 1 1000 • Some examples :
SDP • Use SDP to -approximate MAX-2SAT • The input is a 2-CNF formula, over variables . • A weight to each clause, • Need to find an assignment so that the weight of the satisfied clauses is maximal.
SDP • Use SDP to -approximate MAX-2SAT • Assign a {-1,1} variables, • Also add a special {-1,1} variable , which will determine the mapping between {-1,1} to {True/False}
SDP • Use SDP to -approximate MAX-2SAT • Given any boolean formula C, we want v(C) to be 1 if the formula is true,0 otherwise. • For example if then
SDP • Use SDP to -approximate MAX-2SAT • Another example :
SDP • Use SDP to -approximate MAX-2SAT • This way we can change the 2-CNF to a QP in the form :
SDP • Use SDP to -approximate MAX-2SAT • Relax the program to
SDP • Use SDP to -approximate MAX-2SAT • The expected weight E[V] : • And the same analysis will work here to show that this algorithm is an • -approximate.
Semi-Definite Algorithm for Max-CUT Ran Berenfeld May 10,2005 THE END