1 / 29

CIA Annual Meeting

CIA Annual Meeting. LOOKING BACK…focused on the future. Speaker: Trevor Howes GGY. LOOKING BACK…focused on the future. Sources of Earnings. My perspective… A software vendor with many Canadian clients

oceana
Télécharger la présentation

CIA Annual Meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CIA Annual Meeting LOOKING BACK…focused on the future

  2. Speaker: Trevor Howes GGY LOOKING BACK…focused on the future

  3. Sources of Earnings • My perspective… • A software vendor with many Canadian clients • System used for Individual life, disability, critical illness, LTC and annuity products, Group life and disability claim reserves • Commenced development of “Earnings by Source” features over 7 years ago

  4. Sources of Earnings • What was SOE experience in 2004? • Top-down vs. bottom-up approach • Challenges and questions in implementing a bottom-up approach to SOE

  5. Sources of Earnings • What was the experience with required SOE disclosures for 2004 … • Quality of result? • Approach to development? • Cost of delivery? • Anticipated benefits realized?

  6. Sources of Earnings • High level issues: • Aggregation and coordination • Approach to analysis for “non-traditional” lines • Top-down vs. bottom-up approach for “traditional” PPM reserve lines

  7. Sources of Earnings • Top-down approach • Establish general formula for analysis of aggregate earnings by distributing the change in PPM reserve • Calculate or estimate each component at line of business or block level • Allocate residual balancing amounts

  8. Sources of Earnings • Bottom up approach • Each seriatim policy in force in year theoretically contributes to total actual reserve movement and to actual profit components • Software builds total change in PPM reserve and resulting earnings for modeled business with no residual unexplained value

  9. Sources of Earnings • Characteristics of a “good” Sources of Earnings analysis process: • Easy for users to understand • Can be produced in timely manner • Well documented and validated • Consistently applied from period to period ….

  10. Sources of Earnings • Characteristics of a “good” Sources of Earnings analysis process: • Technically robust; consistent explanations of earnings from period to period • Include all material components of earnings • Identifies the fundamental drivers of earnings

  11. Sources of Earnings Management use of a good SOE: • High level reports of overall trends by line of business and major assumption. • Drill down to major blocks for contributions to each gain or loss • Experience analysis studies to support revised reserve assumptions

  12. Sources of Earnings CIA recommended SOE report: Expected Profit on Inforce XXX Impact of New Business XXX Experience Gains and Losses XXX Changes in Assumptions XXX Other Changes XXX Pre-tax Operating Earnings XXX Earnings on Surplus XXX Net Income before Tax XXX Taxes XXX Operating Earnings XXX

  13. Sources of Earnings • Advantages of bottom up approach: • Technically robust • Components add up with no approximations • Consistency from period to period • Enables timely production • Assures validity vs. reported reserves (provided process uses same software or consistency is regularly verified)

  14. Sources of Earnings • Advantages of bottom up approach • Contributions to earnings available at any level below reported lines of business • Meaningful experience gains available by assumption • Seriatim expected and actual movements available for experience studies

  15. Sources of Earnings • Software issues of bottom-up approach • Applying the traditional source of earnings formula to real business • Handle all business lines and all assumptions • Reconcile actual movements of business • Include new business • Cope with reporting delays

  16. Sources of Earnings • Other challenges of bottom-up approach • Acquiring timely, valid and useable transaction data consistent with ledger data to feed movement analysis • Maintaining cost benefit balance in modelling actual business movements • Applying bottom up approach consistently across business units

  17. Sources of Earnings • Reconciling actual business movements • Actual vs. actuarial movements (e.g. reinstatements, NTU, RPU &ETI,policy changes) • Processing delays within period or over reporting dates • Fund transactions for fund-based products

  18. Sources of Earnings • Handling new business • Including early terminations in model • Time zero reserve impact (with/without PFADs element) vs. experience gains • Reflecting processing delays • Actual issue costs vs. expected • Adjusting investment income

  19. Sources of Earnings • SOE analysis based on traditional reserve accumulation formula: V[0] + VP + II – E – q*DB = V[0]+1*(1–q)

  20. Sources of Earnings • After rearrangement, each profit component in traditional approach is: Gain = expected benefit cost less actual benefit cost plus actual release of PFAD where, cost = benefit cashflow less reserve released from decrements

  21. Sources of Earnings • For traditional (guaranteed cost) products, profit is mainly experience vs. reserve assumptions • The primary benefits of SOE analysis are • validating reserve methodology and assumptions, • identifying assumptions needing review

  22. Sources of Earnings • SOE for fund-based products • reserves are more complex • movements are less predictable • profit is driven by spreads achieved • more sensitive to management action • reserve is largely driven by the size of the policyholder fund • inconsistent with traditional products and requires a different approach to SOE

  23. Sources of Earnings • For Universal Life • PPM reserve can be restated as: Reserve = Fund less PV of future spreads • Changes in Fund portion may or may not impact profit

  24. Sources of Earnings • SOE for Universal Life Gain = actual spread gain less expected spread gain plus actual release of PFADs where, spread gain = charges deducted less cost of related benefits (i.e. benefits paid net of fund released less PV of future spreads released)

  25. Sources of Earnings Challenges of SOE for UL • Reconciliation of actual fund and reserve movement • “Revaluation” at period end • Compromise vs. exact replication of fund movement in model • PV of spreads with level COI

  26. Sources of Earnings • SOE for Disability Income is like traditional life, except for morbidity • Separate incidence from termination gains • Actual incidence cost based on PV of claim on DLR basis at date of claim • Termination experience on opening and new claims reflected in claim payment gain • Recovery to active status with new ALR

  27. Sources of Earnings • Disability income requires special movement transactions: • incidence by 2 causes • claim terminations by death, recovery, or settlement • claim adjustments, suspensions, re-opens?

  28. Sources of Earnings • A bottom-up approach to SOE • enables the full benefit of the analysis • is complex and costly to implement • may pose questions of consistency across lines of business, or between companies • involves both theoretical and practical issues not answered in existing guidance • SOE will evolve over next few years

  29. CIA Annual Meeting LOOKING BACK…focused on the future

More Related