350 likes | 473 Vues
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) poses a significant risk in orthopaedic surgeries, accounting for approximately 25,000 deaths annually in the UK. With 40-60% of joint replacements associated with VTE, the risk of fatal pulmonary embolism (PE) ranges from 0.1% to 5%. Despite varying adherence to thromboprophylaxis, there is an increasing incorporation of both mechanical and chemical prevention methods. Understanding the nuances of VTE risk assessment, particularly for hip and knee replacements, is crucial. Expert guidance and continued audits are essential as practices evolve.
E N D
An Orthopod’s Perspective Venous Thromboembolism Adrian Beaumont Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon Salisbury District Hospital
Size of Problem • ? 25,000 deaths per year • VTE in 40% to 60% joint replacements • Fatal PE in 0.1% to 5% • Inconsistent thromboprophylaxis • Joint registry shows increasing use of mechanical and chemical methods
Fast Track Mobilisation • No clear data on VTE risk • Intuitively beneficial
Nice Guidelines 2010 • Had orthopaedic input • Risk assess • Hip and knee replacements high risk • Combined methods • Oral agents (not aspirin) • Duration • ‘Opt out’ when bleeding risk
Evidence! Or Evidence? Cross trial comparisons • Criteria • End points • Definitions • Sponsored? • Statistics Need Expert Interpretation
Anti-Embolism Stockings • Often problematic for our patients • Wounds, swelling etc • Restricted movement • Large legs
Hip Fractures • Very common • High mortality • Immobility • Delay to theatre • Age
Lower Limb Casts • Evidence if risk • ? UK lags behind Europe • Risk assess or risk forgetting • Plymouth type scoring system • LMWH prescribed at discretion • Ongoing audit
Major Bleeding (EMEA) • Fatal Bleeding • Decrease Hb by 20 grams • Transfusion 2 units blood • Critical bleeding • Leading to discontinuation • At surgical site • Leading to reoperation
Deep Infection Often disastrous Usually means implant removal
Summary • The importance VTE recognised • We have some knowledge of efficacy • Variable but increasing prophylaxis • The adverse effects must be considered • Expert guidance needed • There will be ongoing change