1 / 33

Dublin Core Metadata

Dublin Core Metadata. Howard Besser UCLA School of Education & Information http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/~howard. Metadata for Digital Libraries -. Models for Digital Libraries Importance of Metadata Standards Types and Uses of Metadata Discovery Metadata: The Dublin Core.

olga-ratliff
Télécharger la présentation

Dublin Core Metadata

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Dublin Core Metadata Howard Besser UCLA School of Education & Information http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/~howard

  2. Metadata for Digital Libraries- • Models for Digital Libraries • Importance of Metadata Standards • Types and Uses of Metadata • Discovery Metadata: The Dublin Core

  3. Key problems we’re facing • Discovery • Longevity- • Interoperability-

  4. DL DL DL DL search & presentation search & presentation search & presentation search & presentation user user Traditional Digital Library Model

  5. DL DL DL DL search & presentation user user Ideal Digital Library Model

  6. For Interoperability Digital Libraries Need Standards • Descriptive Metadata for consistent description • Discovery Metadata for finding • Administrative Metadata for viewing and maintaining • Structural Metadata for navigation • ... Terms & Conditions Metadata for controlling access...

  7. Why are Standards and Metadata consensus important? • Managing digital files over time • Longevity • Interoperability • Veracity • Recording in a consistent manner • Will give vendors incentive to create applications that support this

  8. Why Standards? • Why do we need standards? • To make information universally available to users • facilitate sharing and interchange of information • To preserve information (make it safe from changes in hardware and software) • Standards only work if communities widely accept them, but they’re necessary for communities to work together

  9. Why are you Managing this Information? • Organizational mission & type • Users • Uses

  10. Questions to Ask • What communities is this standard designed for? • What type of information is this standard designed to handle? • What functions is this standard designed to serve? • What previous standards is it built upon? • Does the standard prescribe how to create new records (or parts of records), or how to map from existing records? • How far does the standard go? Semantics: Does it define element sets? Rules? Syntax?-

  11. What is Metadata • Structured data describing other data used to find or help manage information resources • Aids in interoperability • Titles, dates, captions, cataloging and indexing data, file headers, rights info, provenance, code books, transaction logs, ... • One person’s metadata is another’s data

  12. Sorting through the Standards Morass • Data Structures (DC, CDWA, MARC, VRA Core, TEI, EAD, MESL data dict) • Data Interchange (Z39.50) • Data Values/vocabularies (LCSH, AAT, ULAN, TGN) • Data Content/syntax (AACR2)

  13. Semantics/Syntax/Structure • Semantics • meaning, as defined by a community to meet their particular needs (DC) • Syntax • a systematic arrangement of data elements for machine processing • facilitates the exchange and use of metadata among various applications (HTML, XML, RDF) • Structure • a formal arrangement of the syntax with the goal of consistent representation of the semantics (rules defining field contents like 1/11/99)

  14. What is MetadataTypes & Uses • lots of different ways of dividing the clusters

  15. Uses of Metadata • Discovery & Retrieval • Identification/Provenance • Rights Management • Viewing • Integrity • Longevity • Content rating

  16. Containers and Packages of MetadataWarwick, not MARC • modular • overlapping • extensible • community-based • designed for a networked world to aid commonality btwn communities while still providing full functionality within each community

  17. Some different schemes where Metdata is kept • embedded withing the object (HTML tags) • in a separate related DB maintained by same organization (OPAC, MOA II) • in a separate DB maintained by a separate organization (Books in Print, ratings systems) • derived on-the-fly from a different scheme (MARC-to-DC)

  18. Collaborative Metadata Projects • Dublin Core • NSF/ERCIM Digital Collaboratory • OCLC CORC Project- • Visual Resources Association (VRA) Core • Encoded Archival Description (EAD) • Computerized Interchange of Museum Information (CIMI)- • Records Export for Art and Cultural Heritage (REACH)

  19. Dublin Core (3/95) • improve resource discovery • anticipate precision problems of Web Crawler-based searching tools • existing metadata could be “dumbed down” • elements should be simple to understand and use, so that any individual should be able to assign terms him/herself • software might eventually automatically generate very base-level metadata

  20. Title Creator Subject Description Publisher Contributors Date Type Format Identifier Source Language Relation Coverage Rights Dublin Core

  21. Dublin Core • every element is both optional and repeatable • elements are cross-disciplinary • elements are extensible by organized communities • can employ a syntax such as html’s <META> tagset for use by Spiders and Harvesters • May 2000 DLF Metadata Harvesting Project

  22. DC Qualifiers • allows one community to express important nuances and qualifications, while still making the basic importance available to communities with simple needs • our community can reflect alternate title, transliterated title, and main title, yet they will all be found under a simple Web search under “title”

  23. Discovery Metadata:Recent History • Dublin Core (3/95) • Warwick Framework (4/96) • Image Metadata Workshop (9/96) • Canberra, Helsinki, ... DC (98) • Digital Library Collaboratory (97-) • DC-8, Frankfurt 10/99

  24. Dublin Core--further work • Warwick Framework • metadata packages for extensible functions • layed groundwork for RDF • Canberra Qualifiers • refining the semantics of the element set to provide more precise info • SUBELEMENT, SCHEME, LANG • Granularity • no hierarchical relationships w/i a given DC record; only one record per discrete object (collection or item-level), and relationship field plus qualifier links them

  25. The Research Process and Functional Categories of Metadata • Discovery • Retrieval • Collation • Analysis • Re-presentation

  26. Metadata Mapping- • Crosswalks • Resource Description Framework (RDF)

  27. Crosswalks • mapping btwn differing metadata structures • eliminate the need for monolithic, universally adopted standards • focus on flexibility and interoperatiblity • RDF-based metadata registries

  28. Crosswalk Example

  29. Resource Description Framework (RDF, spec released 2/99) • W3C Metadata activity • designed to move the Web beyond simple links to semantically-rich relationships btwn resources • metadata application using XML as a common syntax for exchange and processing • flexible architecture for managing diverse application-specific metadata packets that can be processed by machines • associates resources, property types, and corresponding values • http://www.w3.org/RDF/

  30. RDF • Resources (character strings, names, digital objects) • Property (“is the author of”) • Value • resources+properties=relationships • many different relationships can be reflected

  31. XML-encoded RDF • <?xml:namespace ns=http://www.w3.org/RDF/RDF prefix="RDF" ?> • <?xml:namespace ns=http://purl.oclc.org/DC/ prefix="DC" ?> • <RDF:RDF> • <DC:Creator>Howard Besser</DC:Creator> • </RDF:Description> • </RDF:RDF>

  32. Should you start building with RDF today? • Tools are primitive • Standard still likely to evolve

  33. Metadata for Digital Libraries Howard Besser UCLA School of Education & Information Baca, Murtha (ed). Introduction to Metadata, Los Angeles: Getty Information Institute, 1998 http://www.getty.edu/gri/standard/intrometadata/ http://sunsite.Berkeley.EDU/Imaging/Databases/#standards http://sunsite.Berkeley.EDU/moa2/ http://sunsite.Berkeley.EDU/Longevity/ http://www.ifla.org/II/metadata.htm http://purl.oclc.org/metadata/dublin_core/ http://purl.oclc.org/corc/ http://lcweb.loc.gov/ead/ http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/~howard/image-meta.html http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/~howard/Metadata/UC-May00/ http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/Metadata/sp2000.html

More Related