1 / 9

Virtual Collaborative Social Living Community for Elderly

Virtual Collaborative Social Living Community for Elderly. Kick Off Event. Co-Living. WP1 plan 1 st period End Users Needs Analysis and Requirements Specification. Paul Koster - Philips. WP1 Contribution. First 12 months Goals of the work package / work break down

olga-ratliff
Télécharger la présentation

Virtual Collaborative Social Living Community for Elderly

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Virtual Collaborative Social Living Community for Elderly Kick Off Event Co-Living WP1 plan 1st periodEnd Users Needs Analysis and Requirements Specification Paul Koster - Philips

  2. WP1 Contribution First 12 months • Goals of the work package / work break down • T1.1 user needs analysis using focus groups, structured interviews, etc. • T1.2 social community model analysis and design • T1.3 use case scenario development using user-centered design and validation • T1.4a ethical, privacy and legal requirements analysis • T1.4b ethics and privacy committee setup • Expectations of the work package • Timely delivery of comprehensive, rich, business driven scenarios and requirements for social collaborative living to the other Co-Living WPs 15/09/10 Paul Koster - Philips 2

  3. WP1 Contribution First 12 months • Bottlenecks / risks • careful and timely alignment with technical WPs in first phase • Interdependencies T1.1 (user needs) T1.2 (community model) T2.2 (SoCo-net design) T1.3 (scenarios) T2.3 (service design) T4.1-T4.3 (service impl.) T1.4 (privacy needs) T2.4 (security design) Paul Koster - Philips 3 T1.4 (ethics/priv. comm.) T6.1 (priv. prot. plan)

  4. WP1 Contribution First 12 months • Deliverables • D1.1a Specification of user socialization needs (T1.1) and analysis and design of the innovative social practice oriented community model (T1.2) (M08, update D1.1b M24) • D1.2 Specification of use case scenarios (T1.3) (M08) • D1.3 Specification of Ethical, Privacy and Legal Considerations (T1.4) (M04) • [Privacy and ethical committee (T1.4) (M08)] 15/09/10 Paul Koster - Philips 4

  5. WP1 Contribution First 12 months • Planning (activities per task) – to be detailed per task • M0: parallel start T1 – T4 • M2: sync initial user needs and scenarios with community model and privacy reqs tasks • M4: sync intermediate scenarios, community model, privacy reqs with dependent tasks in other WPs • ... • M8: finalize deliverables D1 – D3 • Input / output / dependencies • see slide 3 • Contact persons per partner • Philips – Paul Koster • Orbis - TBD • Trondheim - TBD • Andago - Idoia Olalde • WP1 E-mailer • TBD 15/09/10 Paul Koster - Philips 5

  6. WP1 “Management Team” • WP1 MT = representative (task leader /lead contributor) of all partners • WP leader • Paul Koster, Philips Reserach • Task leaders • T1.1: <TBA>, Orbis • T1.2: <TBA> • T1.3: <TBA>, Orbis • T1.4: Paul Koster, Philips • Deliverable “editors” • D1.1 - Specification of user socialization needs (T1.1) and analysis and design of the innovative social practice oriented community model (T1.2). (M08, M24) • Editor: Orbis (user needs, community model) • Contributors: Philips (community model), Trondheim (user needs) , Andago (community model) • D1.2 - Specification of use case scenarios (T1.3) (M08) • Editor: Orbis • Contributors: Philips, Andago, Trondheim • D1.3 - Specification of Ethical, Privacy and Legal Considerations (T1.4) (M04) • Editor: Philips (privacy and legal requirements) • Contributors: Orbis (Dutch ethics rules, ethics committee), Trondheim (Norwegian ethics rules, ethics committee) 15/09/10 Paul Koster - Philips 6

  7. Communications • Meeting calendar • Regular WP meetings • Conference call • (bi)weekly • Physical meetings • mid-phase (Feb 2010 @ Eindhoven?) • Workshops • To be determined • Task meetings • To be determined 15/09/10 Paul Koster - Philips 7

  8. Expected results • Overall • Timely delivery of comprehensive, rich, business driven scenarios and requirements for social collaborative living to the other Co-Living WPs • Per partner • Philips: • General: comprehensive, rich, and business driven set of scenarios, needs and requirements • Focus: user-centered perspective on privacy requirements and scenarios • Orbis: • `... • Andago: • Identify the needs for the development of ICT-based services • Design of the social practice-oriented community model • Trondheim: • .. 15/09/10 Paul Koster - Philips 8

  9. Conclusions 15/09/10 Paul Koster - Philips 9

More Related