1 / 11

Integrated Acceptance Schedule

Integrated Acceptance Schedule. National Spent Nuclear Fuel Program Strategy Meeting Bill Hurt November 2005. Background. DOE SNF-HLW Integrated Meeting was held Sept. 13 – 14, 2005 The purpose of the meeting was:

olive
Télécharger la présentation

Integrated Acceptance Schedule

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Integrated Acceptance Schedule National Spent Nuclear Fuel Program Strategy Meeting Bill Hurt November 2005

  2. Background • DOE SNF-HLW Integrated Meeting was held Sept. 13 – 14, 2005 • The purpose of the meeting was: • Ensure a common understanding of the issues by Headquarters and the Field Offices • Reach agreement on the issues EM faces concerning the storage, packaging, transportation, and disposal of SNF and HLW • Discuss selected issues and reach decisions to the extent possible • Identify the path forward to resolve issues that remain outstanding

  3. NSNFP was assigned the following tasks • Revise the Integrated Acceptance Schedule (IAS) • Evaluate SNF disposal paths • Determine the need for and timing of packaging/shipping capabilities • Evaluate INL and SRS fuel swaps

  4. Integrated Acceptance Schedule (IAS) • Required by the RM/RW MOA • Provided by EM in coordination with NNPP to RW for approval • Addresses Naval SNF, DOE SNF, and DOE HLW • MOA requires annual updates unless no change is required

  5. IAS Status • The IAS was submitted to RW on July 11, 2001 but never approved by RW • EM has revised the IAS several times but never issued the revisions • Lack of IAS is now impacting DOE’s decision-making process

  6. Process for IAS Update • Prepare and agree upon baseline assumptions • Construct and validate a model • Perform studies of scenarios to select the optimum IAS

  7. Role of other Organizations • Sites, NNPP, and RW will provide input data to NSNFP • HQ, sites, NNPP, and RW will have a review role • EM HQ has the issuance responsibility • RW has approval authority

  8. Issues to be addressed with the IAS Model • SNF disposal paths • Need for and timing of packaging/shipping capabilities • SNF swaps between INL and SRS

  9. Schedule • Project Management Plan has been prepared • The methodology and assumptions are under development • A model will be provided early 2006 • Revised IAS will be provided by mid-2006

  10. Scope of INL – SRS Fuel Swaps Study • Lifecycle cost analysis will be performed • Includes FRR & DRR receipts • Considers H-Canyon options • Addresses RODs, ID Settlement Agreement, etc.

  11. Conclusion • A revised and issued IAS will provide the following: • Fulfills EM’s obligation per the MOA • Provides a model for evaluation of issues • Provides a baseline for future planning

More Related