1 / 16

Engr. Esperanza A. Sajul EIAMD, CO

Overview of the Current Mmt policies. Engr. Esperanza A. Sajul EIAMD, CO. MMT System Review & Assessment. Streamlined processing of ECC Strengthened compliance monitoring. SEPMES Model of Multipartite Monitoring and Audit System proposed (thru Worldbank assisted project)

Télécharger la présentation

Engr. Esperanza A. Sajul EIAMD, CO

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Overview of the Current Mmt policies Engr. Esperanza A. Sajul EIAMD, CO

  2. MMT System Review & Assessment Streamlined processing of ECC Strengthened compliance monitoring • SEPMES Model of Multipartite Monitoring and Audit System proposed (thru Worldbank assisted project) • - Technical guidelines and administrative procedures • - Shared accountability and defined roles of stakeholders • - Supports self-regulation and decentralization

  3. MMT System Review & Assessment Alternatives to MMT considered, e.g., audit, insurance, along with the criterion of “social acceptability” in the ECC applications • Clustering of MMTs • Geopolitical Area • Industry Sector • Ecosystem or Landscape

  4. MONITORING & EVALUATION SYSTEM BEFORE PROPONENT SELF-MONITORING MULTIPARTITE MONITORING TEAM IMPACTS EMB MONITORING LOCAL STAKEHOLDERS MONITORING COMPLAINTS

  5. EMP PROPONENT EMB REVIEW CMR MOO CMVR MMT TEAM VALIDATION ENHANCED MONITORING AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

  6. Comparison of the Old System and key features of the M & E Systems Enhancements Multi-stakeholder Participation in General MMT structure/organization is flexible based on own interpretation of DAO BEFORE BEFORE Standardization through EMoP/EMP-based Manual of Operations (MOO) and Code of Ethics ENHANCEMENTS Rationalized stakeholder participation based on individual capacities of each stakeholder group anchored on EMoP RATIONALE

  7. Comparison of the Old System and key features of the M & E Systems Enhancements Reporting 1) Limited guidelines for proponent and MMT quarterly reporting; 2) Limited to ECC compliance monitoring; BEFORE 1) Technical and administrative guidelines for semi- annual CMR by proponent, and CMR-based MMT CMVR and conflict /complaints management by MMT 2) Monitoring forms developed : CMR, CMVR, CER ENHANCEMENTS Pro-formas ease MMT, proponent and EMB reporting & standardizes monitoring info for better data banking RATIONALE

  8. Comparison of the Old System and key features of the M & E Systems Enhancements Systems Audit No explicit requirement or procedures for audit BEFORE Systems audit as well as MMT performance audit guidelines and procedures developed ENHANCEMENTS For continuous Systems improvement RATIONALE

  9. Prescribed ECC Format – Focus of Compliance Monitoring Scope of project or undertaking • Conditions conformed by the proponent to implement mitigating measures for potentially negative impacts and enhancement measures for potentially positive impacts Recommendations to concerned permitting, deciding and monitoring entities

  10. Underlying purpose of the Environmental Monitoring and Evaluation System • Evaluate effectiveness of environmental measures on prevention or mitigation of actual project impacts vis a vis the predicted impacts used as basis for the EMP design; and continual updating of the EMP for sustained responsiveness to mitigate environmental impacts.

  11. CURRENT MMT POLICIES as per Department Administrative Order No. 30-2003 and the Revised Procedural Manual 2007

  12. CURRENT MMT POLICIES MONITORING/VALIDATION Activities can be done by: • Monitoring (Self) by the Proponent • Monitoring by the DENR/EMB • Monitoring by the MMT /3rd party Auditors

  13. CURRENT MMT POLICIES • Monitoring by the MMT • ►Operationalization of the MMT • Core membership/responsibilities • ► MMT have the primary responsibility of validating the Proponent’s environmental performance. • Validate proponents compliance with stipulations in the ECC • Validate proponents conduct of self monitoring • Act on complaints (validate & provide recommendations) • ►MMT Code of Ethics • ►Formation of the MMT

  14. CURRENT MMT POLICIES Reporting by the MMT ►using the Compliance Monitoring and Validation Report (CMVR) (Annex 3-2 of the rev. Procedural Manual) ►CMVR should be duly signed by the MMT ►Frequency of Monitoring Activities Quarterly - Semi-annual ►Frequency of Submission Semi-annual

  15. CURRENT MMT POLICIES • MMT Manual of Operations (MOO) • Prescribe an outline which shall guide the MMT in the planning of its activities, operationalization of its function and review of its performance • Integration or Clustering of MMTs • ROs are enjoined to cluster, merge or integrate MMTs based on sectoral (e.g. project type), spatial considerations (e.g. area, municipal or provincial level) as may be appropriate

  16. CURRENT MMT POLICIES Thank you

More Related