1 / 31

Securities Fraud Class Action

Securities Fraud Class Action. Last updated 18 Feb 09. Stanford Class Action Clearinghouse. Stanford Class Action Clearinghouse. Anatomy of securities fraud class action …. Securities fraud action. Securities fraud action.

ollief
Télécharger la présentation

Securities Fraud Class Action

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Securities FraudClass Action Last updated 18 Feb 09

  2. Stanford Class Action Clearinghouse

  3. Stanford Class Action Clearinghouse

  4. Anatomy of securities fraudclass action …

  5. Securities fraud action

  6. Securities fraud action Press Release 10/15/03Netflix ended the third quarter of 2003 with approximately 1,291,000 total subscribers, up 144,000 or 13% sequentially. During the quarter Netflix acquired 383,000 new trial subscribers, a 38 percent year-over-year increase from the 277,000 new trial subscribers acquired in the third quarter of 2002 …

  7. Securities fraud action Press Release 6/1/04Netflix has restated its financial information to reflect changes in revenues and earnings for the third and fourth quarters of 2003. This restatement corrects improper information about the number of new subscribers. Management does not, however, believe that these changes detract from a positive outlook for the company …

  8. Law of 10b-5 …

  9. Securities Fraud Action When we deal with private actions under Rule 10b-5, we deal with a judicial oak which has grown from little more than a legislative acorn. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores (US 1975) William Rehnquist

  10. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Section 10 -- Manipulative and Deceptive Devices It shall be unlawful for any person, directly or indirectly, by the use of any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange-- (b) To use or employ, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security registered on a national securities exchange or any security not so registered … any manipulative or deceptive device or contrivance in contravention of such rules and regulations as the Commission may prescribe as necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors.

  11. Rule 10b-5 • Nexus • Transactional • Jurisdictional • Plaintiff • Defendant • Elements • Material misrepresentation • Scienter (intentional) • Reliance • Causation • Damages • Procedure

  12. Reliance

  13. Basic Inc v. Levinson (US 1988) The Lies • 10/21/77: news interview that “no reason for stock activity and no negotiations” • 9/25/78: response to NYSE inquiry that “management unaware of development” • 11/6/78: Quarterly report that “unaware of any developments” The Lies Exposed • 12/18/78: announce tender offer by Combustion

  14. Efficient Capital Market Hypothesis

  15. Basic Inc v. Levinson (US 1988) “… in open and developed securities market .. Misleading statement defraud purchasers of stock even if the purchasers do not directly rely on the misstatements.” “… reliance is an element of a Rule 10b-5 cause of action. “Presumptions typically serve to assist courts in managing circumstances in which direct proof for one reason or another is rendered difficult.” How can presumption be overcome? Justice Harry Blackmun (general practitioner)

  16. Big vs small • Small companies • Less publicized • Fewer analysts • No SEC interest • Smaller total damages • Big companies • Public disclosure • Many analysts • SEC investigation • Large damages

  17. Scienter

  18. Scienter • Rule 9(b) and PSLRA • Circuit courts • Motive and opportunity • Reasonable and strong inferences (insider trading, save salaries) • Deliberate recklessness

  19. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act Exchange Act 21D(b)(1): In any private action arising under this chapter in which the plaintiff may recover money damages only on proof that the defendant acted with a particular state of mind, the complaint shall, with respect to each act or omission alleged to violate this chapter, state with particularity facts giving rise to a strong inference that the defendant acted with the required state of mind.

  20. 2d and 3d Circuits - • Motive and opportunity • Concrete personal benefit • Insider trading

  21. 1st, 5th, 6th, 10th, 11th Circuits • Strong inference of scienter • M&O is external marker • Unusual insider trading

  22. 9th Circuit • “Deliberate recklessness” • Intentional misconduct

  23. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.(US 2007) … PSLRA strong inference of state of mind (scienter) means … “a reasonable person would deem the inference of scienter cogent and at least as compelling as any opposing inference.” … allegations must also be considered “holistically” [isolated insider sales not enough, must have unusual, broad sales] “omissions and ambiguities [in the plaintiffs’ allegations] count against inferring scienter” [discount confidential witnesses] Ruth Bader Ginsburg (civil rights lawyer)

  24. Loss causation

  25. PSLRA [Exchange Act 21D(b)(4)] … In any private action arising under this title, the plaintiff shall have the burden of proving that the act or omission of the defendant alleged to violate this title caused the loss for which the plaintiff seeks to recover damages.

  26. Loss Causation Plaintiffs’ argument: PL shows loss by showing that price inflated on day of purchase

  27. Loss Causation Defendant’s argument: PL must show that price drop actually related to prior false statements

  28. Dura Pharmaceuticals v. Broudo (US 2005) “… .. At the moment the transaction takes place, the plaintiff has suffered no loss.” “When the purchaser subsequently resells at a lower price … that price may reflect not the earlier misrepresentation but changes in economic circumstances. Justice Stephen Breyer

  29. Business model for SFCA plaintiffs’ lawyers …

  30. Class Counsel – Business Model • Get started • identify material corporate misrepresentations • find appropriate shareholders to act as class representatives • file a complaint in a court of class counsel’s choosing • Take care of legalities • defend the complaint against motion to dismiss (on legal grounds) • urge the judge to grant class action status to the litigation • send notice to class members, giving them an option to withdraw from the lawsuit • undertake discovery of information from the company and other sources • Close the deal • enter into settlement negotiations with company officials • champion any settlement before the judge • administer settlement funds • appeal any adverse decisions by the trial court judge

  31. The end

More Related