1 / 17

Assessment of Actinide Decay Data Evaluations: Need for New Measurements Mark A. Kellett

Assessment of Actinide Decay Data Evaluations: Need for New Measurements Mark A. Kellett. contents. IAEA CRP “Updated Decay Data Library for Actinides” Recommendations for new measurements Published evaluated decay scheme data Evaluator comments available Conclusion.

oma
Télécharger la présentation

Assessment of Actinide Decay Data Evaluations: Need for New Measurements Mark A. Kellett

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Assessment of Actinide Decay Data Evaluations:Need for New MeasurementsMark A. Kellett

  2. contents • IAEA CRP “Updated Decay Data Library for Actinides” • Recommendations for new measurements • Published evaluated decay scheme data • Evaluator comments available • Conclusion

  3. updated decay data library for actinides • Following an earlier study (1986), the IAEA launched a new Coordinated Research Project (CRP) in 2005, entitled “Updated Decay Data Library for Actinides” • Aim to provide recommended decay data • But also to highlight shortcomings in the available datasets • Evaluations to be undertaken using the DDEP methodology • This includes detailed evaluator comments • Final IAEA report is in press – but data and comments available through the DDEP website: • http://www.nucleide.org/DDEP_WG/DDEPdata.htm

  4. Summary article of recommendations Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 70, 1919 (2012) [2012KE05]

  5. Radionuclides considered in IAEA CRP

  6. Radionuclides – half-life measurements Blue = more data required, Blue = very poor data exist

  7. Radionuclides – gamma/X-ray spectrometry Green = gamma, Violet = X-rays

  8. Radionuclides – beta spectrometry Blue = more data required

  9. Radionuclides – alpha measurements Red = more data required, Yellow= special case

  10. Radionuclides – some more details (1) • 252Cf: two sets of data, but one w/o uncertainties • 242Pu: weak transitions to high excited states • 240Pu: weak transitions to 3 states ~960 keV • 237Np: inconsistent with γ-ray data • 238U: only two sets, but one from 2000 (also your new data!) • 236U: only one dataset • 234U: results from one group only • 233U/229Th: 7.6 eV level may α-decay • 231Pa: to support decay scheme

  11. Radionuclides – some more details (2) • 228Th: to develop and support decay scheme • 226Ra: two sets of inconsistent data • 224Ra: inconsistent with γ-ray data • 222Rn: early measurements only • 220Rn: from γ-ray data, need to confirm • 218Rn: from γ-ray data, need to confirm • 219At: no data exists • 218At: two very old datasets (1948, 1958) • 217At: minor inconsistencies

  12. Radionuclides – some more details (3) • 215At: weak transitions missing • 218Po: scheme based on 1952 β- data • 216Po: from γ-ray data, need to confirm • 214Po: indirect and inadequate data • 210Po: from γ-ray data (pre-1957), to confirm • 212Bi: low intensity transitions required • 211Bi: current datasets discrepant

  13. Radionuclides – evaluations (1) • All evaluations, comments and data (in ENSDF and ENDF formats) are available through the dedicated IAEA webpage: • http://www-nds.iaea.org/act_ddl/ • with the IAEA report currently in press. • Alternatively, access to the evaluations, ENSDF files and the evaluators’ comments are also available through the DDEP website: • http://www.nucleide.org/DDEP_WG/DDEPdata.htm

  14. Radionuclides – evaluations (2)

  15. Radionuclides – detailed comments Detailed comments from evaluators

  16. Conclusion • Although the newly available actinide decay data evaluations represent the most comprehensive assessments of current experimental data, individual evaluations only reflect the nature of the measurements on which they are based. Hopefully, the recommendations will help focus experimental resources in the right direction. Your help is needed

  17. Thank you for your attention

More Related