1 / 15

POLITICS IN MEXICO

POLITICS IN MEXICO. LUIS ESTRADA lmestrad@weber.ucsd.edu Spring quarter 2005. Conference USMEX 25 th Anniversary. Transition: Electorally driven No ideology in dispute, just to throw the PRI out of government Same politicians under different parties (same ruling elite)

omer
Télécharger la présentation

POLITICS IN MEXICO

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. POLITICS IN MEXICO LUIS ESTRADA lmestrad@weber.ucsd.edu Spring quarter 2005

  2. Conference USMEX 25th Anniversary • Transition: Electorally driven • No ideology in dispute, just to throw the PRI out of government • Same politicians under different parties (same ruling elite) • Democracy still fragile, absence of majorities in the near future • Solution: MORE POLITICS

  3. Voting Behavior • Sociological theory: social environment • Psychological theory: party identification (emotional attachment) • Rational theory: retrospective evaluations of government performance • Electoral studies in Mexico: recent and increasingly methodologically sophisticated • Surveys also recent (‘good ones’ since 1997)

  4. Voting Behavior: Electoral Studies • Surveys: individual level data • Mostly focused on the determinants of vote choice • Parties’ constituencies are clearly differentiated • Ad-hoc studies, lack of data does nto give the chance to make long time-series

  5. Voting behavior • Education • Age • Income • Region • Participation • Party ID

  6. Voting Behavior (Domínguez & McCann 1996) • Two-step model: First, voters decide whether to support or not the PRI; if not, then they decide ‘ideologically’ between PAN or PRD • But, there is no ideology! • Those voters who do not support the PRI choose the party/candidate that can defeat the PRI with most certainty (Estrada 1999; 2005)

  7. Voting Behavior (Domínguez 1999) • Mexican democratic transition has been slowly, where the voter has been the most important protagonist (1988, 1997, 2000) • Diminishing risk aversion thanks to alternation at the municipal-state-federal levels

  8. Voting Behavior (Domínguez 2003) • Why the PRI lost/PAN won in 2000? If the opposition vote was divided; PRI most partisans; PRI strong support in the states; Zedillo’s approval was high • The 2000 campaign mattered, but only one issue was at discussion: “CHANGE”

  9. 1: Weak (unstable) political attachments

  10. 2: Less salient social cleavages (all anti-PRI)

  11. 3: No ideological cues • Individuals hold opinions on issues • These opinions, however, are not connected to an ideological debate • Parties have been so embedded in the issue of alternation that have left aside their ideological origins and differences-this will not change in the near future

  12. Voting Behavior: Perspectives • Candidate-centered campaigns: trivial debates (personality, not issues) • Polarized situation (Presidential regime: “winner takes all” raises the stakes) • No candidate is expected to win more than 40 percent (divided government)

More Related