1 / 52

Values & Ethics Instrumental or Utilitarian

Values & Ethics Instrumental or Utilitarian. Values & Ethics. Conservation biologists tend to have a skewed perspective of the value of biodiversity and tend to think others share their perspective

omer
Télécharger la présentation

Values & Ethics Instrumental or Utilitarian

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Values & EthicsInstrumental or Utilitarian

  2. Values & Ethics • Conservation biologists tend to have a skewed perspective of the value of biodiversity and tend to think others share their perspective • Because so much of conservation biology lies outside the realm of biology, it is in the biologists

  3. Values & Ethics • Environmental philosophers tend to divide value into to main types: instrumental or utilitarian & intrinsic or inherent • Utilitarian is the value that something has as a means to another’s ends • Intrinsic is the value that something has as an end in itself

  4. Values & Ethics • Humans view themselves as having great intrinsic value, but the intrinsic value of the rest of biodiversity is of great debate • As a consequence of the rather recent and somewhat provocative suggestion, many conservation adhere to a strictly utilitarian perspective (a very anthropocentric view)

  5. Values & EthicsInstrumental or Utilitarian • Three basic categories: goods, services and information (but we could also add a psycho-spiritual value)

  6. Values & EthicsInstrumental or Utilitarian • Goods: humans use many living things for many purposes (e.g. food, shelter) • While humans consume >12,000 sp of plants, most routinely eat 6-8 cultivated crops (and rice and wheat are huge) • Only a small fraction of plants have been investigated for their potential as food, medicine, or fiber

  7. Values & EthicsInstrumental or Utilitarian • For example, the Madagascar periwinkle was ‘discovered’ in the 1950’s and is now the preferred treatment for childhood leukemia

  8. Values & EthicsInstrumental or Utilitarian • Services: there are many services provided by functioning ecosystems • If the Gaia Hypothesis is correct, then salinity and temperature are organically regulated • The human economy is just a sub-economy of nature’s economy • Clearly, our impact is felt in virtually every aspect of worldwide ecosystems

  9. Values & EthicsInstrumental or Utilitarian • Information: each species’ genome is a storehouse of information • Given all the potential uses of genetically engineering ‘everything’, genes can be thought of as invaluable • As we discussed, we have only discovered 20-40% of species • Consequently, one could argue preservation is simply in our self-interest

  10. Values & EthicsInstrumental or Utilitarian • Psycho-spiritual: Aldo Leopold had hoped through science, people would acquire “a refined tasted in natural objects” • Wilson finds a special wonder, awe, and mystery in nature-which he calls “biophilia”, which he suggests lies at the foundations of a religion of natural history

  11. Values & EthicsIntrinsic Values • Intrinsic value cannot be further reduced or categorized • It is discussed in terms of the sorts of things that may possess intrinsic value and whether intrinsic value exists objectively or is subjectively conferred

  12. Values & EthicsIntrinsic Values • The biocentric environmental philosophers who claim that intrinsic value exists objectively in human beings and other organisms as follows: an organism is self-organizing and self-directed • How are organisms self-directed?

  13. Values & EthicsIntrinsic Values • Interests may be intelligibly attributable to organisms, but not to machines • However, conservation biologists are really not interested in the well-being of individuals, but rather the preservation of species, health and integrity of ecosystems, and evolutionary and ecological processes

  14. Values & EthicsIntrinsic Values • Rolston argues that because a basic evolutionary “goal” of an organism is to reproduce, its species is therefore one of its primary goods • Since species evolve in a matrix of ecosystems, they too have value • Evolutionary processes, going back to the Big Bang, produced beings with goods of their own, they also have intrinsic value

  15. Values & EthicsIntrinsic Values • Finally, the diversity of organisms existed before we did and facilitated our own evolution, therefore it also has intrinsic value

  16. Values & EthicsIntrinsic Values • More strictly following the classical distinction between objective “facts” and subjective values, some environmental philosophers argue that all value, including intrinsic value, is subjectively conferred (i.e. no conscious subjects, no value)

  17. Values & EthicsIntrinsic Values • Since we can confer value onto other subjects, other species and the hierarchically ordered biotic communities and ecosystems to which we human being belong are-no less than our fellow human beings and our hierarchically ordered human communities-the sorts of entities that we should value intrinsically

  18. Values & EthicsIntrinsic Values • It is important to remember intrinsic and utilitarian values are not mutually exclusive and can be valued for both their utility and themselves

  19. Values & EthicsIntrinsic Values • In fact, some (e.g. Norton) have argued that some environmental philosophers have done more harm than good for the cause of conservation • Why? Because the intrinsic value issue divides conservations into two mutually suspicious factions-anthropocentrics vs. the bio- and ecocentrists

  20. Values & EthicsIntrinsic Values • Ecocentrists regard anthropocentrists as “shallow resourcists” and the later think ecocentrists have gone off the deep end • Norton argues that we really don’t need to appeal to the intrinsic value of biodiversity to base conservation policy

  21. Values & EthicsIntrinsic Values • Attributing intrinsic value to biodiversity, however, makes a practical difference in one fundamental way that Norton seems not to have considered • If biodiversity’s intrinsic value were as widely recognized as is the intrisic value of human beings, would it make much difference?

  22. Values & EthicsIntrinsic Values • It might if we consider shifting the burden of proof

  23. Values & Ethics • Monetizing the value of biodiversity, where the instrumental value to humans is expressed in monetary terms, is a technical task for economists • While some environmental economists explicitly endorse a strict anthropocentrism • However, even the intrinsic value of biodiversity can be taken into account in an economic assessment of conservation goals

  24. Values & Ethics • Considered the actual market value for some endangered species: elephants, rhinos, baleen whales, and tigers all have high economic values • Can this be used to conserve a species?

  25. Values & Ethics • Myers suggests using modern economic theory, which necessitates transforming a species’ market price from a conservation liability into a conservation asset is to take it out of a condition that economists call a “commons” and “enclose” it • Enclosing means assigning the rights to cull the species in question

  26. Values & Ethics • However, a wild species that has a market value is subject to over-harvesting when property rights to it cannot be legitimately asserted and enforced (but should work if protected) • This can lead to the “tragedy of the commons”

  27. Values & Ethics • A side note, another potential problem is the slow rate of return ($) • It has been argued that in some cases (e.g. blue whale) it is more economical to hunt animal to extinction and then invest the money

  28. Values & Ethics • Another potential pitfall of using a strictly utilitarian approach is potential goods, such as new foods, fuels, medicines and such, have NO market price • In the stock market they address this problem by using ‘options’ which is the amount people would be willing to pay in advance to guarantee an option for future use

  29. Values & Ethics • The option price for any given species maybe relatively small, given the small potential return • However, the sum option prices of the million or more species currently threatened with wholesale extinction might add up to a large sum

  30. Values & Ethics • Of course many species are going to have relatively little value • In fact, it is likely the species whose members are the fewest in number, the rarest, the most narrowly distributed-in short, the ones most likely to become extinct

  31. Values & Ethics • There are indirect market values placed on biodiversity such as user-fees (e.g. NP entrances, licenses) • Many environmental-economists attempt to expand the economic value to include other commodities (e.g. gas, lodging, food) when visiting these areas

  32. Values & Ethics • Economists also attempt to account for the “existence” value, in which people take some satisfaction in knowing that biodiversity is there and being protected

  33. Values & Ethics • One way to assess the “existence” value is to calculate the amount people contribute to organizations dedicated to protecting species, even if they may never see them

  34. Values & Ethics • It appears that we really have two parallel and mutually incommensurable systems for determining the value of things: the market and the ballot box • Everything can (and is) monetized, including you

  35. Values & Ethics • The ESA was a political attempt to stop monetizing biodiversity (recognizing the typical inherent tension between political and monetary values) • In 1978 the ESA was amended to create a high-level interagency committee “the God Squad” which could allow a project that put a listed species in jeopardy of extinction if economics justified it

  36. Values & Ethics • Snail Darter & TVA

  37. Values & Ethics • The approach advocated is using a safe minimum standard (SMS), an alternative to aggregating everything from the market price to the shadow price of price of biodiversity, then plugging it into a cost-benefit analysis

  38. Values & Ethics • The shift in the burden of proof according to the stand CBA vs. SMS

  39. Values & Ethics • In traditional Western religious and philosophical tradition, only humans are worth of ethical consideration • All else is typically regarded as just as a means to the ends • The term “dominion” is used to justify actions

  40. Values & Ethics • However, Norton has already shown that anthropocentrism can still be a strong advocate for biodiversity • An anthropocentric conservation ethic would require individuals, corporation, and other interest groups to fairly consider how their actions that directly affect the natural environment

  41. Values & Ethics • The problem of conservation is frequently framed as one of satisfying human needs and wants at the expense of other species • However, not all people equally share the burden of conservation • Who is taking on more of the burden? • Who is causing the problems?

  42. Values & EthicsJudeo-Christian Stewardship • Stung by the allegation that the Judeo-Christian worldview was ultimately responsible for bringing about the contemporary environmental crisis, some environmentally concerned Christians and Jews have begun to challenge the traditional view of resource and biodiversity stewardship

  43. Values & EthicsJudeo-Christian Stewardship • There are many passages that suggests God wants his people to be a good steward over the planet and not a tyrant • How important is this?

  44. Values & EthicsJudeo-Christian Stewardship • Traditional non-Western views (e.g. Islam and Buddhism) are also world religions with millions of followers • Harvard has sponsored 13 conferences on “Religions of the World and Ecology”

  45. Values & EthicsJudeo-Christian Stewardship • Muslims believe that Islam was founded in the 7th century through Mohammed who believed himself a similar prophet as Moses and Jesus • Consequently, Muslim belief has much in common with basic Judeo-Christian worldviews (e.g. humans are privileged) • Muslims also do not differentiate secular and religious law… meaning??

  46. Values & EthicsJudeo-Christian Stewardship • There are many promising passages that include ‘man being only a manager of the earth and not a proprietor, a beneficiary not a disposer or ordainer” as well as “managing for future generations”

  47. Values & EthicsJudeo-Christian Stewardship • Emerson and Thoreau were both influenced by Hinduism • The idea is that God is not a supreme being among lesser and subordinate beings, but all beings are a manifestation of the one essential Being (Brahman)

  48. Values & EthicsJudeo-Christian Stewardship • Buddhism is based upon releasing oneself from desires • Hence the only way to reach what you desire is to not obtain what you desire • Buddhists believe that all living beings are companions on the path to Buddhahood and nirvana

  49. Values & Ethics • The Dalai Lama is taking a leadership role worldwide in environmentalism worldwide preaching the interconnectedness of everything and everyone

  50. Values & Ethics • About 20% of the world is Chinese and there is a good basis for environmentalism within their religious structure • Taoists believe there is a Tao, a Way, or natural way about things

More Related