1 / 7

Objective To evaluate the quality of PhD/MPhil education at CityU Deliverables

Quality of research degree education at CityU: An outcome-based study Sik Hung Ng & Joseph Wu Department of Applied Social Studies, CityU Michael Platow Department of Psychology, ANU. Objective To evaluate the quality of PhD/MPhil education at CityU Deliverables

onofre
Télécharger la présentation

Objective To evaluate the quality of PhD/MPhil education at CityU Deliverables

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Quality of research degree education at CityU: An outcome-based studySik Hung Ng & Joseph WuDepartment of Applied Social Studies, CityUMichael PlatowDepartment of Psychology, ANU

  2. Objective To evaluate the quality of PhD/MPhil education at CityU Deliverables • A report on levels of achieved education outcomes and how the outcomes might have been affected by contributing factors • Two seminars for faculty and research degree students, respectively • A research paper for conference presentation and publication Institutional alignment SGS, EDGE, IAG, QAC

  3. Outcomes of PhD/MPhil education/training • Disciplinary knowledge/productivity: duration of study, publications (2) Employability: time between thesis submission and employment, salary (3) Graduate attributes (generic qualities that are largely discipline-independent): critical/analytical thinking, problem-solving, communication, leadership, team-work

  4. Graduate attributes, though elusive, are important: “If universities do not promote the development of these attributes, they need only to (indeed, ought only to) provide vocational education rather than traditional liberal arts or theory-based degrees.” Platow, M. (in press). PhD experience and subsequent outcomes: A look at self-perceptions of acquired graduate attributers and supervisor support. Studies in Higher Education.

  5. Factors contributing to outcomes: students’ academic background, English proficiency, gender, full-time/part-time study, local vs. nonlocal status, tuition scholarship, perceived supervisor support, integration with host department, conference attendance

  6. Data Primary data sets: Exit surveys of research degree students (1st wave: 2007-8; 2nd wave: 2008-9) Others: records in information systems such as Banner and RIMS (Research Student Information Management System) Research time table • Overall: 1 December, 2010 to 31 May, 2011. • Two seminars for faculty and research degree students, respectively, in late January (to be announced)

  7. Thank you

More Related