1 / 17

Evolving X-ray Polarimetry towards high energy and solar science Sergio Fabiani

Evolving X-ray Polarimetry towards high energy and solar science Sergio Fabiani Università degli Studi di Roma “Tor Vergata ” INAF / IAPS. I A P S Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali. OUTLINE

ordell
Télécharger la présentation

Evolving X-ray Polarimetry towards high energy and solar science Sergio Fabiani

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Evolving X-ray Polarimetry towards high energy and solar science Sergio Fabiani UniversitàdegliStudi di Roma “Tor Vergata” INAF / IAPS I A P S Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali

  2. OUTLINE • PolarimetryBasics • Solar Flares X-ray Emission • Solar Flares X-ray Polarization • Photoelectric Polarimeter (Gas Pixel Detector – Low Energy: • 2-35 keV) • Compton Polarimeter (High Energy : starting from 20 keV) • Conclusions

  3. POLARIMETRY BASICS Polarimetry = Analyser + Detector Axis Analyser: For analysing different angles of polarization with respect to an axis Detector : For detecting photons for each angle Unpolarized radiation → same probability for all angles → flat response Polarized radiation → different probability for different angles → Modulated response For 100 % polarized radiation we define the MODULAITON FACTOR

  4. POLARIMETRY BASICS Polarization Degree S : source rate B : background rate T : integration time Minimum Detectable Polarization (at 99% confidence level) If S >> B (source dominated) For MDP=1%, with m=0.5 We need to detect 736 *10^3 photons A LOT OF COUNTS !! N of photons needed to achieve a value of MDP

  5. SOLAR FLARES X-RAY EMISSION http://solarb.msfc.nasa.gov/news/07192008.html http://sprg.ssl.berkeley.edu/~tohban/nuggets/?page=article&article_id=14 • Polarimetry can give information about: • Magnetic Field • Directivity of acceleratedelectrons • Plasma emitting source geometry • Magneticreconnection • Heating of plasma • Acceleration of electrons • Bremmsstrahlungemission • Compton back scattering

  6. SOLAR FLARES X-RAY EMISSION Flares are classified according to the order of magnitude of the peak burst intensity (I) measured at the earth in the 1-8 Angstrom wavelength band (about 1.55 – 12.4 keV).

  7. SOLAR FLARES X-RAY POLARIZATION Thermal bremsstrahlung with a low degree of polarization expected (few per cent) [Emslie & Brown (1980)] Non-thermal bremsstrahlung expected to be highly polarized up to 40-50 % [ Zharkova et al. (2010) ] [Suarez-Garcia et a. 2006l] RHESSI results… [ X1.5 classflare by Karlicky et al. (2004)] The RHESSI satellite didn't give a clear result !!

  8. Gas Pixel Detector • Photoelectric polarimeter: polarimetry, image, spectrum, timing • 2-35 keV with different gas mixtures • He - DME gas mixture (2-10 keV) • Ar- DME gas mixture (10-35 keV)

  9. SOME ESTIMATION FOR GPD • MDP for flare spectrum previouslyshown (Dt=16 s) • 1 cm^2 GPD collectingeffective area • Ar (60%) - DME (40%) • Pressure 3 bar • Gas cellthickness 3 cm [Fabiani et al. (2012)] For achievinglow MDP large collecting area isneeded… MDP a 1 / √ (CollectingEffective Area) • Two option for preservingimagingcapability: • GPD + CodedMask Aperture (1cm^2) x N : Array option • GPD + X-raytelescope (atleast some tens of cm^2)

  10. COMPTON POLARIMETER SCHEME Coincidence for background reduction Scattering and loss of energyconvertedinto light within the scintillator Absorption E incomingphotonenergy E’ scatteredphotonenergy • Loss of imagingcapabilityif a monolithicscintillator • isemployed… butthereisgood light collectionwhich • allows a goodsignaldetection, • For preservingimagingcapabilitycould be employedasscatterer a bundle of scintillatingfiberscoupled with a position sensitive detector. Usualcladdedfibersgive rise to a large light loss … thereisgoodcollectiononly for light photonswhichundergototalinternalreflection.

  11. WHAT TO DO… Telescope Telescope Coded Mask Aperture OR GPD Compton 15 20 35 ( keV)

  12. CONCLUSIONS • Solar Flares X-ray emission in a wide energy band allows to study: → different polarization properties (thermal vs non thermal emission) → polarization maps of solar flares with the GPD imaging capabilities • At the present many controversial results have been achieved (not only RHESSI results… ) • Work in progress for characterization and development of instrumentation for X-ray polarimetry covering a wide energy band → Photoelectric (2-35 keV) → Compton (starting from 20 keV)

  13. RHESSI [gamma-rays (blue) and X-rays (red)] and TRACE [UV image]View of January 20, 2005 Solar Flare. (http://solarb.msfc.nasa.gov/science/multimedia.html)

  14. RHESSI. Rotating platform (15 rpm), solar hard X-imaging and spectroscopy. Two different techniques: high energy (> 100 keV) software determination of coincidence event between 9 Germanium detectors. Low energy (< 100 keV) it uses the scattering from a passive Be block collimated toward the sun. The bottom section of the Germanium detectors collects the photons scattered by the Beryllium block.

More Related