1 / 1

Three-Dimensional Spinal Range of Motion Differences in Axial Rotation: Dominant vs. Nondominant

This study investigates the three-dimensional spinal range of motion (ROM) differences during axial rotation towards dominant (DO) and nondominant (NDO) directions. Significant differences were observed in spinal ROM based on dominance (F=198.83, p=0.001), as well as in interactions between region and dominance (F=14.21, p=0.001) and dominance and dimension (F=141.08, p=0.001). A three-way interaction involving region, dominance, and dimension was also significant (F=26.30, p=0.001).

oriole
Télécharger la présentation

Three-Dimensional Spinal Range of Motion Differences in Axial Rotation: Dominant vs. Nondominant

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Figure 2. Three-dimensional spinal range of motion (ROM) differences for axial rotation to dominant (DO) and nondominant (NDO) directions. Spinal ROM was significantly different between dominance (F = 198.83, p = 0.001), region × dominance (F = 14.21, p = 0.001), and dominance × dimension (F = 141.08, p = 0.001). A three-way interaction was found between region, dominance, and dimension (F = 26.30, p = 0.001) (X = frontal, Y = sagittal, Z = transverse planes). Error bars indicate standard deviation from mean. L = left, R = right. Koontz AM, Lin YS, Kankipati P, Boninger ML, Cooper RA. Development of custom measurement system for biomechanical evaluation of independent wheelchair transfers. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(8):1015-28.DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2010.09.0169

More Related