1 / 25

Anderson’s theory of faulting

Anderson’s theory of faulting. Goals : 1) To understand Anderson’s theory of faulting and its implications. 2) To outline some obvious exceptions to Anderson’s theory and some possible explanations for how these exceptions work. Primary assumptions.

oshin
Télécharger la présentation

Anderson’s theory of faulting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Anderson’s theory of faulting Goals: 1) To understand Anderson’s theory of faulting and its implications. 2) To outline some obvious exceptions to Anderson’s theory and some possible explanations for how these exceptions work.

  2. Primary assumptions • Surface of the earth is not confined, and not acted on by shear stresses. • Also, tectonic plates move parallel with Earth’s surface (unknown in 1951) • Homogenous rocks • Coulomb behavior

  3. Three possible stress combinations Hypothetically requires 2 of the 3 principal stresses to be parallel with the surface of the earth What are they? What kind of faults would you expect at each?

  4. σ1 horizontal, σ3 vertical — reverse faults • σ1 vertical, σ3 horizontal — normal faults • σ1 horizontal, σ3 horizontal — strike-slip faults

  5. Most rocks have an angle of internal friction ≈ 30° What dip angles does Anderson’s theory predict for • σ1 horizontal, σ3 vertical — reverse faults? • σ1 vertical, σ3 horizontal — normal faults? • σ1 horizontal, σ3 horizontal — strike-slip faults?

  6. Hypothetically Reverse faults: should form at ~30° dip Normal faults: should form at ~60° dip Strike-slip faults: should form at ~90° dip Can you think of any exceptions??

  7. Common exceptions • Thrust faults— mechanically unfavorable • Low-angle normal faults— mechanically very unfavorable

  8. Possible explanations • Elevated pore fluid pressure • Pre-existing weaknesses • Rolling-hinge model for low-angle normal faults

  9. 1. Elevated pore fluid pressure (Pf)

  10. σs High Pf can lower effective stress σ1eff σ1 σn σ3eff σ3

  11. σs This can activate slip on a low-angle fault σn σ3eff σ1eff

  12. σs However, if cohesive strength is sufficiently low... σn σ3eff σ1eff

  13. Pore-fluid-pressure mechanism requires low σeff on fault, but high σeff in surrounding rocks

  14. σs It also doesn’t work well for low-angle normal faults σn σ3eff σ1eff

  15. 2. Pre-existing anisotropy • Bedding • Weak layer (salt, shale) • Foliation

  16. Donath (1961) produced shear fractures at very low angles to σ1 in anisotropic rock

  17. 3. Rolling-hinge model for low-angle normal faults

  18. Cartoon cross section illustrating the rolling-hinge model

  19. East Humboldt Range Ruby Mountains

  20. Geologic map of the Ruby Mountains and East Humboldt Range

  21. Cross section of a low-angle normal-fault system

  22. Cartoon cross section illustrating the rolling-hinge model

More Related