1 / 53

2011-2012 PRELIMINARY BUDGET DRAFT 3 APRIL 14, 2011

2011-2012 PRELIMINARY BUDGET DRAFT 3 APRIL 14, 2011. CPS VISION. We will be a premier learning organization, fostering relationships with school and community to develop contributing and productive citizens. CPS PRIORITIES & GOALS.

ossie
Télécharger la présentation

2011-2012 PRELIMINARY BUDGET DRAFT 3 APRIL 14, 2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2011-2012 PRELIMINARY BUDGET DRAFT 3 APRIL 14, 2011

  2. CPS VISION We will be a premier learning organization, fostering relationships with school and community to develop contributing and productive citizens.

  3. CPS PRIORITIES & GOALS • High quality, guaranteed curriculum & assessments supported by rigorous assignments • Increase achievement & success for all students • Continued partnerships with community & parents • Failure is not an option – supporting all students • Safe & orderly environment

  4. Budget Development Goals • Maintain & strengthen the integrity of the instructional program K-12, matching resources with student achievement. • Present a balanced budget. • Maintain financial integrity & stability of the district in accordance with board goals. • Review staffing levels to meet enrollment, student achievement, and operational needs.

  5. Budget Development Goals(continued) • Utilize bond funds to maximize long term efficiency of operational budgets. • Develop budget through a consultative approach using a zero base budgeting method resulting in a recommendation by the Superintendent to the Board of Education.

  6. Decision Making Parameters Staff Development/School Improvement • Provide support for increase in student achievement. • Assure alignment of curriculum implementation. • Review for alignment with district mission / goals. • Encourage promotion of individual professional growth.

  7. Decision Making Parameters Personnel • Adhere to legal and contractual requirements. • Consider student enrollment needs. • Consider operational requirements. • Utilize total cost compensation for contract development.

  8. Decision Making Parameters Capital Outlay • Assure student and employee safety. • Maintain building integrity. • Consider student enrollment needs. • Allow for program completion to full operational levels.

  9. Decision Making Parameters Financial Integrity • Maintain long term district financial integrity.

  10. Budget Highlights • Full Day, Every Day Kindergarten • Spanish Language Instruction in Elementary Schools • Year-round Educationally Based Childcare Program • Leader in Advanced Placement High School Offerings

  11. Budget Highlights • Variety of Choice in High School Offerings • Charlotte Performing Arts center Offerings & Events • State-of-the-Art Middle School • Modern Athletic Facilities

  12. Budget Highlights • Safe, Orderly, & Well Maintained Schools • Majority of Teachers with Masters Degrees Supplemented with Continuous Teacher Training • Array of Extra Curricular Offerings • Award Winning Band & Vocal Music Instruction

  13. Budget Highlights • District Strategic Plan • Quality Special Needs Programming • State-of-the-Art Technology in School Buildings • New Education Foundation for Program Development & Enhancement

  14. WHERE HAVE WE BEEN?

  15. 2009-2010 Budget ReductionsWeymouth Redesignation Custodial Services (1.2 FTE) Principal Position (1.0 FTE) Secretarial/Office Parapro Position (1.7 FTE) Teaching Positions (2.7 FTE) Elementary Social Worker Position (1.0 FTE)

  16. 2009-2010 Budget ReductionsWeymouth Redesignation (continued) Transportation Savings Utilities Technology/Media Purchased Services/Supplies/Other Total Projected Savings: $752,555

  17. 2009-2010 Budget ReductionsPersonnel Changes Teaching Positions (12.1 FTE) Paraprofessional Positions (9.0 FTE) Principal Position (1.0 FTE) Secretary Positions (1.5 FTE) Transportation Restructuring (1.2 FTE) Guidance Position (1.0 FTE)

  18. 2009-2010 Budget ReductionsPersonnel Changes (continued) Central Office Position (1.0 FTE) Custodial Service Restructuring Lab Tech Position (0.5 FTE) Other Assignment Restructuring Total 09-10 Personnel Changes: $1,289,938

  19. 2010-2011 Budget ReductionsPersonnel Changes Teaching Positions (4.7 FTE) Paraprofessional Restructuring Technology/Media Director Position (1.0 FTE) Guidance Position (2.0 FTE) Central Office Position (0.37 FTE)

  20. 2010-2011 Budget ReductionsPersonnel Changes (continued) Custodial Service Restructuring Media Specialist Position (1.0 FTE) Schedule B Changes Other Assignment Restructuring Total 10-11 Personnel Changes: $ 816,157

  21. District Administration 34% reduction in supervision and administrative costs since 2005

  22. Business & Administrative Efficiency CPS is ranked number 18 out of 774 districts for greatest business & administrative efficiency. • Top 2% of All Michigan School Districts for Efficiency • 08/09 State Average Cost Per Pupil = $1,169 • 08/09 CPS Average Cost Per Pupil = $ 783 • $386 Per Pupil Under State Average $386 x 3,194 Students = $1,232,884 Savings Compared to State Average **Information taken from most recent MDE Bulletin 1014 (2008-2009).**

  23. Governor’s School Funding Proposal $195.9 Million to Community Colleges $699.7 Million to State Universities $895.6 Million to Higher Education from K-12 State Aid Fund (Equivalent of $550 per Pupil)

  24. 2011-2012 Fiscal Projection(with Governor’s $470 Recommended Cut)

  25. 2011-2012 Fiscal Projection(with Governor’s $470 Recommended Cut)

  26. 2011-2012 Fiscal Projection(with $300 Cut)

  27. 2011-2012 Fiscal Projection(with $300 Cut)

  28. Annual Revenue History Total 2008-2009 $ 26,935,973 Total 2009-2010 $ 25,008,629 Total 2010-2011 $ 24,845,310 Projected Total 2011-2012 $ 22,225,614 Projected Total 2012-2013 $ 21,026,784

  29. State Aid Calculation 2011-2012 Foundation Allowance Per Pupil $6,846.00 X Projected Blended Enrollment x 2,845 Total Foundation Allowance $19,474,799 Foundation Allowance $19,474,799 Local Millage (@ 18 Mills on Non-Homestead)$ (2,712,463) State Aid From Foundation Allowance: $16,762,336

  30. TOUGH TIMES TOUGH CHOICES

  31. 2011-2012 Budget Overview • Elementary Redesignation (closing as an elementary building) • 4th Grade Moving to Middle School • Closing of Aquatic Center • Elimination of School Within A School and Wheel Time at Middle School

  32. 2011-2012 Budget Overview • Increased Walk Zone to 1.5 Miles (MS/HS) • Reduced Athletic Transportation • Technology Replacement Costs Assumed by Broadband Funds

  33. Elementary 2011-2012 Redesignation Instructional Efficiency Savings: $317,400 Operational Savings: $266,119 Misc. Supply/Tech Savings: $ 63,481 Total Estimated Savings: $647,000

  34. Total Elementary Staffing Reductions Decrease of Instructional Staff: 7.00 FTE Includes: teachers, media, specialists, special education Decrease of Support Staff: 4.83 FTE Includes: paraprofessional, guidance, administration, secretarial

  35. Total Middle School Staffing Reductions Decrease of Instructional Staff: 6.49 FTE Includes: teachers, media, special ed Decrease of Support Staff: 1.53 FTE Includes: guidance, secretarial *Includes elimination of wheel time and school within a school *Accommodates five grade levels

  36. Total High School Staffing Reductions Decrease of Instructional Staff: 1.59 FTE Includes: teachers, media, special ed Decrease of Support Staff: 0.75 FTE Includes: guidance, secretarial

  37. Total Special Education Staffing Reductions Decrease of Instructional Staff: 1.13 FTE Decrease of Support Staff: 0.50 FTE

  38. Media and Technology • $30,000 reduction in district media purchased services and supplies

  39. ATHLETIC DEPARTMENT • No change to student participation fee • Require a minimum of 12 participants for any sport • Eliminate all Saturday transportation/One Way = $10,000 - $20,000

  40. AQUATIC CENTER Current Proposed Operating Revenues $ 143,900 $ 152,700 Instructional Transfer $ 82,845 $ 85,794 Total Revenues $ 226,745 $ 238,494 Total Expenditures $ 361,996$ 373,016 Net Surplus (Deficit) $(135,251) $(134,522) **Proposed Aquatic Center Closure in July 2011** **Combined savings to general fund of $220,000**

  41. PERFORMING ARTS CENTER • Professional series is self-supporting, covering all related costs with no general fund support. • Overall reduction in budget of $18,000

  42. CUSTODIAL/MAINTENANCE Staff Restructuring: Less 2.37 FTE Reductions in Supplies/Purchased Serv: $71,500

  43. TRANSPORTATION Expanding Walk Zone for Middle School & High School to 1.5 Miles • Associated Savings of $25,000

  44. FISCAL SERVICES Staff Reduction Less 1.00 FTE District Mail Services Reduced 30%

  45. Preliminary 2011-2012 Budget Summary Total Projected Revenues: $22,235,614 Total Projected Expenses: $23,052,831 Total Projected Deficiency: $ (817,217) *The above shortfall assumes all budget options presented in this presentation are included.*

  46. Projected 2012-2013 Budget Summary Total Projected Revenues: $21,026,784 Total Projected Expenses: $23,231,060 Total Projected Deficiency: $ (2,204,276)

More Related