1 / 15

The Impact of Health Care Reform on Public Programs

The Impact of Health Care Reform on Public Programs. Cindy Mann Center for Children and Families Georgetown University Health Policy Institute http://ccf.georgetown.edu National Health Policy Conference Academy Health February 2-3, 2009.

ourquhart
Télécharger la présentation

The Impact of Health Care Reform on Public Programs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Impact of Health Care Reform on Public Programs • Cindy Mann • Center for Children and Families • Georgetown University Health Policy Institute • http://ccf.georgetown.edu • National Health Policy Conference • Academy Health • February 2-3, 2009

  2. Public Programs’ Coverage Role Today(Non-elderly, 2007) Children = 78.6 million Adults = 182.8 million Employer-Sponsored Insurance Uninsured Medicaid/ Other Public Individual Coverage Source: Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured/Urban Institute analysis of 2008 ASEC Supplement to the CPS.

  3. Medicaid in the Health System, 2006 Medicaid as a share of national health care spending: Total National Spending (billions) $2,106 $648 $660 $125 $217 NOTE: Does not include spending on SCHIP SOURCE: Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, based on A Catlin et al, “National Health Spending in 2006: A Year of Change for Prescription Drugs,” Health Affairs 27(1)14-29, January/February 2008. Based on National Health Care Expenditure Data, CMS, Office of the Actuary.

  4. Income and Health Status of Medicaid and the Low-Income Privately Insured, 2002 Percent of Enrolled Adults: Low-Income and Privately Insured Medicaid Poor Fair or Poor Health Health Conditions that limit work SOURCE: Coughlin et. al, “Assessing Access to Care Under Medicaid: Evidence for the National and Thirteen States,” Health Affairs 24(4):1073-1083. Based on a 2002 NSAF analysis for Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured.

  5. Income Levels of Uninsured, 2007 Children = 8.9 million Adults = 36.1 million 300% + 200-299% 100-199% 70% below 200% FPL 84% below 200% FPL Under 100% Source: Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured/Urban Institute analysis of 2008 ASEC Supplement to the CPS.

  6. Proposals Obama plan maintains Medicaid and SCHIP, but no details yet. Baucus plan extends Medicaid to all below 100% FPL and requires states to cover children in SCHIP up to 250% of FPL; higher levels required/permitted.

  7. Key Issues • Achieving national uniformity amidst state variation • Financing public program expansions/improvements • Assuring public programs work as they should in the context of universal coverage

  8. Minimum Medicaid Income Eligibility Levels Sources: B. Bruen, et al., “State Usage of Medicaid Coverage Options for Aged, Blind, and Disabled People,” Urban Institute (August 1999); and Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, "Medicaid Eligibility for Families and Children" (September 1998). Note: The income level for parents represents the median maximum AFDC payment level as of June 16, 1996.

  9. Number of States that Cover Above the Federal Minimums Sources: D. Cohen Ross and C. Marks, “Challenges of Providing Health Coverage for Children and Parents in a Recession,” Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured (January 2009); B. Bruen, J. Wiener, and S. Thomas, “ Medicaid Eligibility Policy for Aged, Blind, and Disabled Beneficiaries,” Urban Institute (November 2003).

  10. Medicaid and SCHIP Eligibility Levels for Children, January 2009 WA* NH VT MT* ME ND OR MN MA ID WI SD NY WY MI RI CT IA* PA NV NE NJ OH* IL UT IN* DE CO* CA WV* KS* VA MD MO KY NC* DC TN AZ OK* NM AR SC MS AL GA TX LA* AK FL HI < 200% FPL (4 states) 200% FPL (16 states) 201%-250% FPL (9 states) > 250% FPL (21 states) Source: D. Cohen Ross, A. Horn, & C. Marks, “Health Coverage for Children and Families in Medicaid and SCHIP: State Efforts Face New Hurdles,” Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured (January 2008);updated by the Center for Children and Families. Note: States with asterisks (*) have enacted, but not yet implemented to the levels shown.

  11. Federal-State Partnership(State and Federal Spending on Acute Care, 2009-2014) Sources: Center for Children and Families analysis based on Congressional Budget Office, “March 2008 Baseline: Medicaid” (March 11, 2008); and Congressional Budget Office, “Cost Estimate of H.R. 2 Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009” (January 13, 2009). Note: SCHIP spending includes administrative costs.

  12. 4 Out of 10 Medicaid Dollars are Spent on Medicare Beneficiaries Total Medicaid Expenditures = $303.6 billion Other Aged and Disabled $79.2 billion 26.1% “Dual” Eligibles $133.3 billion 43.9% Adults $32.0 billion 10.5% Children $47.5 billion 15.6% Unknown $11.6 billion 3.8% Source: Urban Institute estimates based on data from the Medicaid Statistical Information System (MSIS) and Medicaid Financial Management Reports (CMS Form 64) prepared for the Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, 2008.

  13. Impact of Unemployment Growth on Medicaid and SCHIP $3.4 1.1 $1.4 State 1.0 = & 1% $2.0 Federal Increase in National Unemployment Rate Increase in Medicaid & SCHIP Enrollment (million) Increase in Uninsured (million) Increase in Medicaid & SCHIP Spending (billion) Source: S.Dorn, et al.,”Medicaid, SCHIP and Economic Downturn: Policy Challenges and Policy Responses,“ Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, April 2008. Note: a 1% increase in unemployment also equals a 3-4% decline in state revenues.

  14. Public Program Eligibility and Take Up for Children Take-up Rate 70.5% 66.4% 78.3% Source: Background estimates for Julie Hudson and Thomas Selden, "Children's Eligibility and Coverage: Recent Trends and a Look Ahead," Health Affairs 26(5): w618-w629 (September 2007).

  15. (Some) Other Issues • Benefits • Access/payment rates • Integration among components • Quality standards/improvements • HIT

More Related