50 likes | 207 Vues
This document provides insight into the behavior of various page replacement algorithms such as FIFO, LRU, and MIN in demand paging scenarios. It highlights the fault rates encountered in different sequences of page references, illustrating how each algorithm handles memory management under load. Using example data, the paper discusses the effectiveness and performance of these algorithms, drawing conclusions on when and why certain strategies may be preferable. This analysis can benefit computer science students and professionals interested in operating systems and memory management.
E N D
Page Replacement PageRefs A B C D A B E A B C D E A A A A A A E E E E D D 10faults B B B B B B A A A A E FIFO C C C C C C B B B B D D D D D D C C C A A A A A A A A A A D D 6faults B B B B B B B B B B B MIN C C C C C C C C C C D D D E E E E E E A A A A A A A A A A A E 8faults B B B B B B B B B B B LRU C C C C E E E E D D D D D D D D C C C CS 140 Lecture Notes: Demand Paging
More Memory Isn't Always Better PageRefs A B C D A B E A B C D E A A A D D D E E E E E E 9faults B B B A A A A A C C C FIFO C C C B B B B B D D A A A A A A E E E E D D 10faults B B B B B B A A A A E FIFO C C C C C C B B B B D D D D D D C C C CS 140 Lecture Notes: Demand Paging