1 / 2

Current Trends and Comparative Outcomes in Laparoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy

This compilation reviews recent literature on laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy, evaluating current practices, outcomes, and the role of advanced imaging techniques. Research includes assessments from major transplant centers in the U.S., long-term outcomes comparing laparoscopic to open procedures, and the efficacy of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in preoperative vascular evaluation. This analysis highlights the benefits and potential risks associated with minimally invasive techniques in renal transplantation, offering insights for clinicians and transplant coordinators.

ovidio
Télécharger la présentation

Current Trends and Comparative Outcomes in Laparoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. BIBLIOGRAFÍA • Wright AD, Will TA, Holt DR, Turk TM, Perry KT. Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: a look at current trends and practice patterns at major transplant centers across the United States. J Urol 2008;179(4):1488-92. • Troppmann C, Perez RV, McBride M. Similar Long-Term Outcomes for Laparoscopic Versus Open Live-Donor Nephrectomy Kidney Grafts: An OPTN Database Analysis of 5532 Adult Recipients. Transplantation 2008;85(6):916-9. • Nanidis TG, Antcliffe D, Kokkinos C, Borysiewicz CA, Darzi AW, Tekkis PP et al. Laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy in renal transplantation: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2008;247(1):58-70. • Holden A, Smith A, Dukes P, Pilmore H, Yasutomi M. Assessment of 100 live potential renal donors for laparoscopic nephrectomy with multi-detector row helical CT. Radiology 2005;237(3):973-80. • Raman SS, Pojchamarnwiputh S, Muangsomboon K, Schulam PG, Gritsch HA, Lu DS. Utility of 16-MDCT angiography for comprehensive preoperative vascular evaluation of laparoscopic renal donors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186(6):1630-8. • 5.

  2. Singh AK, Sahani DV, Kagay CR, Kalva SP, Joshi MC, Elias N et al. Semiautomated MIP images created directly on 16-section multidetector CT console for evaluation of living renal donors. Radiology 2007;244(2):583-90. • Rastogi N, Sahani DV, Blake MA, Ko DC, Mueller PR. Evaluation of living renal donors: accuracy of three-dimensional 16-section CT. Radiology 2006;240(1):136-44. • Sahani DV, Rastogi N, Greenfield AC, Kalva SP, Ko D, Saini S et al. Multi-detector row CT in evaluation of 94 living renal donors by readers with varied experience. Radiology 2005;235(3):905-10. • Raman SS, Pojchamarnwiputh S, Muangsomboon K, Schulam PG, Gritsch HA, Lu DS. Surgically relevant normal and variant renal parenchymal and vascular anatomy in preoperative 16-MDCT evaluation of potential laparoscopic renal donors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188(1):105-14.

More Related