html5
1 / 14

D. A. Jensen Dec 8, 2005

Proton Counting – an Update Understanding the Details November 2005 for this reference set with updates, calibration comments. D. A. Jensen Dec 8, 2005. Understanding the Numbers.

paiva
Télécharger la présentation

D. A. Jensen Dec 8, 2005

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Proton Counting – an UpdateUnderstanding the DetailsNovember 2005 for this reference setwith updates, calibration comments D. A. Jensen Dec 8, 2005

  2. Understanding the Numbers • The goal here is to look at a sample of data – the November running – and make a number of checks and comparisons to validate and check the data. • This is data from the Data Logger only. No comparisons with the minos data stream ( this should of course be done ! ) • Also provide more insight into the running conditions and accelerator operations. • The Question: How many protons have been delivered to the target ? • How well do we know the number of protons delivered ?

  3. Toroid Calibration Issues • Consider BEAM23[5], TOR101 ( and TR101D), TORTGT (and TRTGTD) • Three independent calibrations - Note that BEAM23[5] is checked against other, e.g. TeV, monitors • There is no reason to assume one calibration is ‘right’, so no cross calibrations have been applied • The ‘reference toroid’ is TORTGT • The ratios of the torids have been very stable. • July 19 – TOR101 calibrated, July 26 – TORTGT calibrated • DCCT recalibrated Oct 18 – Changes < 5 x 10-4

  4. Examples of Toroid Ratios • Date T101/DCCT TGTD/DCCT TGTD/101D • July 25 .994 .991 .997 • Sept 26 .995 .993 .997 • Nov 1 .997 .995 .997 • Nov 12 .997 .995 .998 • Nov 28 .997 .993 .997 • .995 .993 .997

  5. Sample Toroid RatiosTypically 1 hour blocks of NuMI only running, σ ~ 2.5 x 10-4

  6. Continuing with other Checks • Stability Checks • Operations

  7. Usual Presentation – 1.9 x 1019 this month

  8. Number of Spills with Beam • At 2 sec per cycle, could get 43,200 spills/day • Average 30,900 • With Beam 26,500 • ‘With’/’Avg’= 0.86

  9. Spill Frequency How often do we get beam – or have the chance of getting beam? Avg = 2.93 sec

  10. Another Presentation of Missed Spills

  11. Are there Data Logger Problems ? • Compare the NuMI data logger (heavily loaded ) with the Clock data logger (lightly loaded ) • TRTGTD studied • (NuMI – Clock) /Clock data loggers

  12. Independent Toroid Comparison • Apparent Transport Efficiency • Data from the NuMI data logger • Average = 0.9971

  13. On-Going Issues – Always More Questions • Automate this type of checking - in progress • Background – correction is small -(few) x 10-4 • Miss last pulse of day – correction +(few) x 10-4 ( Gordon caught the fact that a spill in the last second of the day may be missed depending on how the data is pulled from the logger, does not impact the calculation of the milestone of 1 E 20 protons ) • Month by Month summaries • More ??? • It looks like we can keep the error on the number of protons to ± 1 %

  14. Reaching1.0 x 1020 There are several blocks of ‘running’ included. Units are 1.0 x 1018 Dec 04 – Apr 05 00.84 ( Feb, Mar - see earlier talk ) May – November 95.00 Dec 1 – 5 4.09 Dec 6, to 11:30 am .40 Total 100.33 Still Subject to checks and minor corrections

More Related