1 / 34

Precision SM tests at the LHC using ATLAS and CMS

Precision SM tests at the LHC using ATLAS and CMS. Peter R Hobson School of Engineering & Design Brunel University. Talk given at RAL on 13 June 2005. Contents. ATLAS & CMS Jets Drell-Yan B physics Top physics Electroweak (TGC) Single photons. ATLAS. CMS. Day 1 of LHC p+p.

palma
Télécharger la présentation

Precision SM tests at the LHC using ATLAS and CMS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Precision SM tests at the LHC using ATLAS and CMS Peter R Hobson School of Engineering & Design Brunel University Talk given at RAL on 13 June 2005

  2. Contents • ATLAS & CMS • Jets • Drell-Yan • B physics • Top physics • Electroweak (TGC) • Single photons

  3. ATLAS

  4. CMS

  5. Day 1 of LHC p+p From F Gianotti, LHC Physics, La Thuile 2005

  6. Year 1 at the LHC From F Gianotti, LHC Physics, La Thuile 2005

  7. Year 1 at the LHC From F Gianotti, LHC Physics, La Thuile 2005

  8. Effects on physics reach

  9. Effects on physics reach b-tagging in ATLAS From G Polisello, Les Houches 2005

  10. Jet Physics Atlas • Measure jet ET spectrum, rate varies over 11 orders of magnitude • Test QCD at the multi-TeV scale Inclusive jet rates for 300 fb-1: From J Mnich, Physics at the LHC, Vienna 2004

  11. Test of pQCD in an energy regime never probed! The measurement of di-jets and their properties (ET and η1,2) can be used to constrain p.d.f.’s Inclusive jet cross section: αsmeasurement with 10% accuracy Multi-jet productionis important for several physics studies: Top-pair production with hadronic final states Higgs production in association with tt and bb Search for R-parity violating SUSY (8 – 12 jets). Systematic uncertaintiess (statistical will be small): luminosity (dominant uncertainty 5% -10% ) jet energy scale calorimeter response (linearity) jet trigger efficiency knowledge of p.d.f.’s value of strong coupling constant, αs uncertainties in parton shower modeling Jet signatures - - ET Jet [GeV] From VA Mitsou, QCD Conference Montpellier 2004

  12. Drell-Yan Lepton-Pair Production q e, /Z pT > 6 GeV || < 2.5 e+, + q Inversion of e+e qq at LEP LHC 1 fb-1 Z pole • Total cross section • pdf • parton lumi • search for Z, extra dim. , ... • Much higher mass reach as • compared to Tevatron From J Mnich, Physics at the LHC, Vienna 2004

  13. Drell-Yan Lepton-Pair Production • Forward-backward asymmetry • estimate quark direction • assuming xq > xq • Measurement of sin2W effective • 2004: LEP & SLD • sin2W = 0.23150  0.00016 • AFB around Z-pole • large cross section at the LHC • (Z  e+e)  1.5 nb • stat. error in 100 fb-1 • incl. forward electron tagging • (per channel & expt.) • sin2W  0.00014 • Systematics (probably larger) • PDF • Lepton acceptance • Radiative corrections Atlas [%] From J Mnich, Physics at the LHC, Vienna 2004

  14. QCD effects enter DY production in initial state only  predictions less uncertain Reconstruction of leptons (e, μ) unambiguous identification ( opposed to jets ) Di-lepton production constrains proton structure atQ2≈ mℓℓ2 W and Z production: huge statistical samples ~105 events containing W (pTW > 400 GeV, L=30fb-1) ~104 events containing Z (pTZ > 400 GeV, L = 30fb-1) W± production: higher cross-section for W+ than for W- different yW-distributions: W+ forward; W- central constrain quark and anti-quarkdensities in the proton [ud(bar)W+; u(bar) d W-] W+jet production study colour coherence Z production provides accurate reconstruction of final state (no neutrino!) Pair production (WW, ZZ, WZ) study triple gauge boson constants NLO calculation pTmiss>20 GeV |ηℓ|<2.5 Drell-Yan processes • Represent background sources to many new phenomena searches From VA Mitsou, QCD Conference Montpellier 2004

  15. B Physics at ATLAS & CMS From VM Ghete Physics at LHC Vienna, 2004

  16. B Physics at ATLAS & CMS From VM Ghete Physics at LHC Vienna, 2004

  17. B Physics at ATLAS & CMS From VM Ghete Physics at LHC Vienna, 2004

  18. - ggbb - gggg, g bb c & b production - - • Dominant production mechanism for heavy quarks (b and t) is gg fusion • Cross-section calculation: • pQCD processes leading to QQ state • non-pQCD to transform into colour-singlets • tuning with Tevatron data • Measurements of heavy quark production will provide constraints on the gluon density • Jet-flavour identification (c-jet or b-jet): • high-pT muons (ε≈ 85%, σ=39 MeV) • b-tagging (vertexing detectors) • b-quark • lower-pT mesons are experimentally accessible compared to charm-quarks • 10-4<x<0.1 • b-b(bar) correlations: • Δφμμ≈π  mostly LO QCD • Δφμμ≈0 only NLO QCD ψ´ J/ψ gbgb From VA Mitsou, QCD Conference Montpellier 2004

  19. Cross section determined to NLO precision Total NLO(tt) = 834 ± 100 pb Largest uncertainty from scale variation Compare to other production processes: Top production cross section approximately 100x Tevatron Opposite @ FNAL Top production ~90% gg~10% qq LHC is a top factory! From S Bentvelsen, QCD Conference Moriond 2004

  20. Br(ttbbjjl)=30%for electron +muon Golden channel Clean trigger from isolated lepton The reconstruction starts with the W mass: different ways to pair the right jets to form the W jet energies calibrated using mW Important to tag the b-jets: enormously reduces background (physics and combinatorial) clean up the reconstruction Lepton side Hadron side Golden-plated MTop channel • Typical selection efficiency: ~5-10%: • Isolated lepton PT>20 GeV • ETmiss>20 GeV • 4 jets with ET>40 GeV • >1 b-jet (b40%, uds10-3, c10-2) Background:<2% W/Z+jets, WW/ZZ/WZ

  21. Hadronic side W from jet pair with closest invariant mass to MW Require |MW-Mjj|<20 GeV Assign a b-jet to the W to reconstruct Mtop Kinematic fit Using remaining l+b-jet, the leptonic part is reconstructed |mlb -<mjjb>| < 35 GeV Kinematic fit to the tt hypothesis, using MW constraints j2 j1 b-jet t Lepton + jet: reconstruct top • Selection efficiency 5-10% W-mass From S Bentvelsen, QCD Conference Moriond 2004

  22. Method works: Linear with input Mtop Largely independent on Top PT Biggest uncertainties: Jet energy calibration FSR: ‘out of cone’ give large variations in mass B-fragmentation Verified with detailed detector simulation and realistic calibration Top mass systematics Challenge: determine the mass of the top around 1 GeV accuracy in one year of LHC From S Bentvelsen, QCD Conference Moriond 2004

  23. Use exclusive b-decays with high mass products (J/) Higher correlation with Mtop Clean reconstruction (background free) BR(ttqqb+J/)  5 10-5  ~ 30%  103 ev./100 fb-1 (need high lumi) Top mass from J/ MlJ/ Different systematics (almost no sensitivity to FSR) Uncertainty on the b-quark fragmentation function becomes the dominant error M(J/+l) M(J/+l) From S Bentvelsen, QCD Conference Moriond 2004 Mtop

  24. Determination MTop in initial phase Use ‘Golden plated’ lepton+jet Selection: Isolated lepton with PT>20 GeV Exactly 4 jets (R=0.4) with PT>40 GeV Reconstruction: Select 3 jets with maximal resulting PT Signal can be improved by kinematic constrained fit Assuming MW1=MW2 and MT1=MT2 Top During Commissioning Calibrating detector in comissioning phase Assume pessimistic scenario: -) No b-tagging -) No jet calibration -) But: Good lepton identification No background included From S Bentvelsen, QCD Conference Moriond 2004

  25. Signal plus background at initial phase of LHC Most important background for top: W+4 jets Leptonic decay of W, with 4 extra ‘light’ jets Alpgen, Monte Carlo has ‘hard’ matrix element for 4 extra jets(not available in Pythia/Herwig) Top During Commissioning ALPGEN: W+4 extra light jets Jet: PT>10, ||<2.5, R>0.4 No lepton cuts Effective : ~2400 pb L = 150 pb-1 (2/3 days low lumi) With extreme simple selection and reconstruction the top-peak should be visible at LHC measure top mass (to 5-7 GeV) give feedback on detector performance From S Bentvelsen, QCD Conference Moriond 2004

  26.  R(|Vtb|)=   Direct |Vtb| extraction: single top / single W Moreover, in principle, many theoretical errors would disappear by normalising s-channel events over single W events: (with care in choosing coherent cuts for the two processes, to avoid the reintroduction of the same errors in a subtler way) From A Giammanco, Les Houches 2005

  27. 3rd jet: b (mostly undetectable) T-channel 2nd jet: recoil 1st jet: b from t Single top: “how to” For MET and Ht, single top lies in the middle between non-top and ttbar bkgs.S-channel: S/B<0.2, main bkgs: ttbar->2l (1 lost), Wbb, t-channel. T-channel is much easier to select, due to higher cross section and unique topology. General strategy (both s/t-ch.): • 1 isolated lepton • 2 high Et jets • at least 1 tagged b-jet • missing Et • l+MET: MT compatible with W • Ht (scalar sum of all Et’s) • M(lb) in a window around Mt s/t-channel separation: • 2(b-t-b)/1 tagged b-jets • 0/1 jets in the forward calo • 2/1 central jets • angular distance between the reco top and the remaining jet CMS note 1999/048 From A Giammanco, Les Houches 2005

  28. TGC From M Dobbs, Hadron Collider Physics 2004

  29. TGC From M Dobbs, Hadron Collider Physics 2004

  30. QGC From M Dobbs, Hadron Collider Physics 2004

  31. TGC CMS studies • W (Kate Mackay, Peter Hobson, Karlsruhe Group) • CMSJET studies with BAUR generator (Phys Rev D41 1476 (1990)) • Full background study • CMS Notes: 2000/017, 2001/052, 2001/056, CMS Thesis 1999/019 • Z (Kate Mackay, Peter Hobson, Davy Machin, Karlsruhe Group) • CMSJET studies with BAUR Z generator • Full background study • CMS notes: 2000/017, 2002/028, CMS Thesis 2005 • WZ • No CMS specific study • W (Richard Croft) • CMSJET study with W2GRAD generator

  32. Status of CMS W Analysis • Signal • BAUR NLO MC • Used in CMSJET studies • Backgrounds • W+jet – main background • Radiative W decay • Quark-Gluon fusion • Cuts: • isolated high pt photon, lepton and missing energy. • pT()> 100 GeV • pT(l)> 25 GeV • pT()> 50 GeV • MT(,l,) > 90 GeV • R(,l) > 0.7 • pT 2nd Jet < 25 GeV • || < 2.5 Peter Hobson, Kate Mackay

  33. Status of CMS W Analysis Peter Hobson, Kate Mackay

  34. Direct photon - • Two main contributions: • qg→q QCD Compton scattering (dominating) • qq→g annihilation process • Information on gluon density in the proton ( requires good knowledge of αs ) • Background: jetswith a leading π0 • Isolation cut: low hadronic activity in a cone around the photon • ATLAS: high granularity calorimeters ( |η| < 3.2 ) allow good γ/jet separation • Di-photon production: mγγand Δφγγ sensitive to soft gluon emission • Understanding irreducible background from fragmentation in gg fusion: crucial for Hγγ searches LO γγ production From VA Mitsou, QCD Conference Montpellier 2004

More Related