1 / 20

Telescoping in on the Microscopic Origins of the Fast Solar Wind

Telescoping in on the Microscopic Origins of the Fast Solar Wind. Steven R. Cranmer & Adriaan van Ballegooijen Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. Magnetic connectivity of the open field. Cranmer & van Ballegooijen (2005). Fisk (2005). Tu et al. (2005).

pascal
Télécharger la présentation

Telescoping in on the Microscopic Origins of the Fast Solar Wind

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Telescoping in on theMicroscopic Origins of theFast Solar Wind Steven R. Cranmer & Adriaan van Ballegooijen Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics

  2. Magnetic connectivity of the open field Cranmer & van Ballegooijen (2005) Fisk (2005) Tu et al. (2005)

  3. Is a time-steady approach doomed? • Open-field regions show frequent jet-like events. • Evidence of magnetic reconnectionbetween open and closed fields? • How much of the solar wind is ejected like this? Hinode/SOT: Nishizuka et al. (2008) Antiochos et al. (2011) • Is there enough mass & energy released to heat/accelerate the entire solar wind?

  4. What processes drive solar wind acceleration? • No matter the relative importance of reconnection events, we do know that waves and turbulent motions are present everywhere... from photosphere to heliosphere. • How much can be accomplished by only these processes? (Occam’s razor?) Hinode/SOT SUMER/SOHO G-band bright points UVCS/SOHO Helios & Ulysses Undamped (WKB) waves Damped (non-WKB) waves

  5. Turbulence-driven solar wind models • A likely scenario is that the Sun produces MHD waves that propagate up open flux tubes, partially reflect back down, and undergo a turbulent cascade until they are damped at small scales, causing heating. Z– Z+ Z– (e.g., Matthaeus et al. 1999) • Cranmer et al. (2007) explored the wave/turbulence paradigm with self-consistent 1D models, and found a wide range of agreement with observations (including composition!) Ulysses 1994-1995 (see also, e.g., Suzuki & Inutsuka 2006; Verdini et al. 2010; Usmanov et al. 2011; Matsumoto & Suzuki 2011; Chandran et al. 2012)

  6. Turbulent heating scales with field strength • Mean field strength in low corona: • If the regions below the merging height can be treated with approximations from “thin flux tube theory,” then: • Thus, . . .and the turbulent heating in the low corona scales directly with the mean magnetic flux density there (e.g., Pevtsovet al. 2003; Schwadron et al. 2006; Kojima et al. 2007; Schwadron & McComas 2008).

  7. Increase the complexity of the field . . . • Existing models used low-resolution magnetic fields. What will happen when we solve for the time-steady plasma conditions along higher-resolution field structures (with higher rates of shear, more QSLs, etc.)? 8727 field lines: Δt = 1 min. Δφ = 0.01o Δx on surface = 100 km 1 SOLIS pixel ≈ 800 km Overkill? \Maybe not... SOLIS Vector SpectroMagnetograph on KittPeak + PFSS (Borovsky 2008)

  8. Expectations from flux-tube expansion Wang & Sheeley (1990) found an anticorrelation between flux tube expansion and wind speed at 1 AU . . . low f FAST high f SLOW

  9. Adjusting the field strength Unmodified SOLIS potential fields: Add photospheric component... is it enough? Black curves: Cranmer et al. (2007)

  10. Extremely preliminary results Cranmer et al. (2007) ZEPHYR output ~WS90 scaling ACE SOLIS B-field insufficient coronal heating!?

  11. Do the “flux tubes” survive to 1 AU? • Fast/slow wind stream structure leads to corotating interaction regions (CIRs) and shocks in the heliosphere. • We applied the upwind differencing method of Riley & Lionello (2011) to the empirical u–f relationship. • The finest-scale flux tube variations may be swept away at 1 AU, but SPP & Orbitermay see much higher variances in plasma parameters in the inner heliosphere! r = 20 Rs r = 40 Rs r = 1 AU

  12. Conclusions • There is still a lot that can be done with “time-steady” wave/turbulence models. • Some “spaghetti-like” time variability may be generated from high-resolution lower boundary structure in the magnetic field. (more expected closer to Sun) AIA/SDO • Magnetically complex regions may generate more waves. (ZEPHYR models used identical wave boundary conditions.) • Take into account how turbulence “shreds” flux tubes. • Collisionlesskinetic physics (Tp ≠ Te ≠ Tion) • Confront models with actual data! (present & future) Next steps . . .

  13. extra slides . . .

  14. Cranmer et al. (2007): other results Wang & Sheeley (1990) ACE/SWEPAM ACE/SWEPAM Ulysses SWICS Ulysses SWICS Helios (0.3-0.5 AU)

  15. What is the source of solar wind mass? • Until relatively recently, the dominant idea was that a steady rate of “evaporation” is set by a balance between downward conduction, upward enthalpy flux, and local radiative cooling (Hammer 1982; Withbroe 1988). heat conduction radiation losses • On the other hand, new observations of spiculesand jets (e.g., Aschwanden et al. 2007; De Pontieu et al. 2011; McIntosh et al. 2011) fuel the idea that a lot of the corona’s mass is injected impulsively from below. 5 2 — ρvkT Schrijver (2001)

  16. Controversies about waves & turbulence • Where does the turbulent cascade begin?Chromosphere? Low corona? Some say it doesn’t become “fully developed” turbulence until < 1 AU. ~ In simulations that include flux-tube expansion, complex turbulent motions are induced, even down in the middle chromosphere! (van Ballegooijen et al. 2011) Simple motions input at photospheric lower boundary.

  17. Other questions to address • Coronal heating from MHD turbulence: • Does damping of turbulence produce the right mixture of collisionless kinetic effects? • How can we better constrain the frequency spectrum of waves/turbulence in the corona? (crucial for non-WKB reflection) • Origin of lowest-frequency (1/f) waves seen at 1 AU: • The self-consistent product of a turbulent cascade? • Spacecraft passage through “spaghetti-like” flux tubes rooted on the solar surface? (Borovsky 2008) • Do reconnection/loop-opening events generate enough mass, momentum, & energy to power the solar wind?

  18. How are ions preferentially heated? UVCS results (mainly in coronal holes) have spurred a lot of theoretical work . . . but observations still haven’t allowed the exact mechanisms to be pinned down! • MHD turbulence may have some kind of “parallel cascade” that gradually produces ion cyclotron waves in the corona and solar wind. • When MHD turbulence cascades to small perpendicular scales, the small-scale shearing motions may be unstable to generation of cyclotron waves (Markovskii et al. 2006). • Dissipation-scale current sheets may preferentially spin up ions (Dmitruk et al. 2004). • If MHD turbulence exists for both Alfvén and fast-mode waves, the two types of waves can nonlinearly couple with one another to produce high-frequency ion cyclotron waves (Chandran 2005). • If nanoflare-like reconnection events in the low corona are frequent enough, they may fill the extended corona with electron beams that would become unstable and produce ion cyclotron waves (Markovskii 2007). • If kinetic Alfvén waves reach large enough amplitudes, they can damp via wave-particle interactions and heat ions (Voitenko & Goossens 2006; Wu & Yang 2007). • Kinetic Alfvén wave damping in the extended corona could lead to electron beams, Langmuir turbulence, and Debye-scale electron phase space holes which could heat ions perpendicularly (Matthaeus et al. 2003; Cranmer & van Ballegooijen 2003).

  19. CPI is a large-aperture ultraviolet coronagraph spectrometer that has been proposed to be deployed on the International Space Station (ISS). • The primary goal of CPI is to identify and characterize the physical processes that heat and accelerate the plasma in the fast and slow solar wind. • CPI follows on from the discoveries of UVCS/SOHO, and has unprecedented sensitivity, a wavelength range extending from 25.7 to 126 nm, higher temporal resolution, and the capability to measure line profiles of He II, N V, Ne VII, Ne VIII, Si VIII, S IX, Ar VIII, Ca IX, and Fe X, never before seen in coronal holes above 1.3 solar radii. • 2011 September 29: NASA selected CPI as an Explorer Mission of Opportunity project to undergo an 11-month Phase A concept study.

More Related