1 / 21

Reduction of Additive Noise in the Digital Processing of Speech

Reduction of Additive Noise in the Digital Processing of Speech. Avner Halevy AMSC 664 Final Presentation May 2009 Dr. Radu Balan Department of Mathematics Center for Scientific Computation and Math. Modeling. Background and Goal. Digital speech signals

patience-kelly
Télécharger la présentation

Reduction of Additive Noise in the Digital Processing of Speech

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Reduction of Additive Noise in the Digital Processing of Speech Avner Halevy AMSC 664 Final Presentation May 2009 Dr. RaduBalan Department of Mathematics Center for Scientific Computation and Math. Modeling

  2. Background and Goal • Digital speech signals • Clean signals are degraded by noise • From environment • From processing (recording, transmitting, etc.) • Speech enhancement: reduce noise without distorting original (clean) signal

  3. Scope and Goal • Focus on additive white Gaussian noise • Improve quality and intelligibility • Use short time analysis (frames) • Explore two algorithms: • Spectral Subtraction • Iterative Wiener Filtering • Test objectively using TIMIT

  4. Spectral Subtraction • Estimate the magnitude of the noise spectrum when speech is absent • Subtract the estimate from the magnitude of the spectrum of the noisy signal • Keep the noisy phase • Inverse Fourier to obtain enhanced signal in time domain

  5. Spectral Subtraction

  6. Wiener Filter - Theory

  7. Iterative Wiener - Theory

  8. Implementation, Validation, Testing • Both algorithms were implemented in MATLAB on a standard PC • Implementation validated using zero noise, stability ensured using small nonzero noise • Testing based on TIMIT • Main objective measure used: segmental SNR

  9. Testing Clean Noisy

  10. Comparison of SS and IW

  11. Comparison of SS and IW Spectral Subtraction Iterative Wiener

  12. Comparison of Results

  13. Comparison of Results

  14. Comparison of Results

  15. Convergence of IW: Female, 1st sent.

  16. Convergence of IW: Female, 2nd sent.

  17. Convergence of IW: Male, 1st sent.

  18. Summary of Iteration Results

  19. Conclusions • Objectively, IW produced better results • Subjectively, both methods suffer from severe artifacts (musical noise) • Possible improvement by more sophisticated noise estimation

  20. Questions?

  21. Bibliography • [1] Deller, J., Hansen, J., and Proakis, J. (2000) Discrete Time Processing of Speech Signals, New York, NY: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers • [2] Quatieri, T. (2002) Discrete Time Speech Signal Processing, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall • [3] Loizou, P. (2007) Speech Enhancement: Theory and Practice, Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis Group • [4] Rabiner, L., Schafer, R. (1978) Digital Processing of Speech Signals, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall • [5] Vaseghi, S. (1996) Advanced Signal Processing and Digital Noise Reduction, Stuttgart, Germany: B.G. Teubner • [6] Lim, J. and Oppenheim, A.V. (1978) All-pole modeling of degraded speech, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process., 26(3), 197-200

More Related