1 / 16

International Health Regulations (IHR 2005) Laboratory and Zoonosis update

International Health Regulations (IHR 2005) Laboratory and Zoonosis update. Workshop on Laboratory Diagnosis for Zoonotic Pathogens 30 July – 01 August, Chonburi, Thailand. Dr Richard Brown, WHO Thailand. Priorities and context in the Asia Pacific Region?.

patrick-leach
Télécharger la présentation

International Health Regulations (IHR 2005) Laboratory and Zoonosis update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. International Health Regulations (IHR 2005)Laboratory and Zoonosis update Workshop on Laboratory Diagnosis for Zoonotic Pathogens 30 July – 01 August, Chonburi, Thailand Dr Richard Brown, WHO Thailand

  2. Priorities and context in the Asia Pacific Region? • Priority Hazards to Public Health in the Asia Pacific Region..? • Emerging and re-emerging communicable diseases, including zoonoses • Anti-microbial resistance • Increasing incidence / recognition of chemical / toxic events • Increasing incidence of some natural disasters (typhoons & floods) • A changing context… • Rapid economic development and industrialization • Increasing travel • Effects of climate change

  3. What are the revised International Health Regulations (2005)? • An internationally agreed instrument for global public health security • Represents the joint commitment of countries for shared responsibilities and collective defence against the spread of disease • Legally binding for WHO Member States since June 2007

  4. Revision means a new approach • From control at borders, to containment at source • From a‘list of diseases’ to a broad range of threats • From preset measures to risk-based assessment / response • National IHR Focal points • WHO IHR Contact Points in Regional Offices • IHR Department in WHO Headquarters • Annual reporting to the World Health Assembly • Internet-based ‘Event Information Site’ • An IHR ‘Emergency Committee’ and an IHR ‘review process’

  5. What does IHR implementation actually mean…? • Two very important aspects… • An immediate and ongoing requirement for countries to report some types of event when they occur, and for WHO to provide assistance • Joint risk assessment • Joint response • A requirement, linked to a timeframe for countries to establish ‘core capacities’ to detect and respond to public health events (initially, by June 2012)

  6. IHR as a Public Health Good

  7. What needs to be reported to WHO? • Any potential ‘Public Heath Event of International Concern’ (PHEIC) • To help any decision about what to report, some criteria have been established to describe a potential PHEIC • Is the public health impact of the event serious? • Is the event unusual or unexpected? • Is there a significant risk of international spread? • Is there a significant risk of international travel or trade restrictions? • A decision on whether to report an event to WHO will normally be made by the national IHR focal point

  8. IHR Core Capacities • Eight “core capacities” • National legislation, policy and financing • Coordination and National Focal Point (NFP) Communications • Surveillance • Response • Preparedness • Risk communication • Human resources • Laboratory (need to safely diagnose / exclude all important endemic or imported pathogens and support diagnosis of chemical / toxic ‘events’) • Points of Entry • Capacities for IHR-relevant hazards (infectious diseases, zoonoses, food safety, chemical, radio-nuclear)

  9. Implementation of IHR Core capacities in the SEA Region

  10. Laboratory Services

  11. Laboratory Biosafety / Biosecurity

  12. IHR laboratory capacities: SEA Region

  13. IHR Laboratory capacities: WP Region

  14. Current situation…. • Many countries that did not achieve IHR core capacities by June 15th 2014 have already applied for a second 2-year extension, until June 15th 2016 • When countries apply for an extension, they have to submit a detailed implementation plan • In the South-East Asia Region, only Thailand and Indonesia have not requested an extension • There is interest from US Government partners to fund capacity building, including support for leadership by Thailand

  15. Thailand can play an important role in supporting other countries • It is not feasible for all countries to develop high-level capacity for laboratory diagnosis of all infectious diseases • Small countries only need to have access to laboratory • International laboratory networks are more efficient for some purposes • Requires ‘arrangements’ for safe inter-country shipping of specimens • Support can also be provided through • Assessing laboratory services in other countries • Delivery of training • Reviewing / developing guidelines • Supporting outbreak response ‘in the field’

  16. Thank you!

More Related