1 / 14

A simple remote user authentication scheme

A simple remote user authentication scheme. M. S. Hwang, C. C. Lee and Y. L. Tang, “A simple remote user authentication scheme,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling , Vol. 36, No. 1-2, pp. 103-107, July 2002.

patsy
Télécharger la présentation

A simple remote user authentication scheme

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A simple remote user authentication scheme M. S. Hwang, C. C. Lee and Y. L. Tang, “A simple remote user authentication scheme,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, Vol. 36, No. 1-2, pp. 103-107, July 2002. E. J. Yoon, E. K. Ryu and K. Y. Yoo, “An improvement of Hwang–Lee–Tang's simple remote user authentication scheme,” Computers & Security, In Press. Presented by Hsing-Bai Chen (陳星百) 17 Sep. 2004 http://islab.iecs.fcu.edu.tw

  2. Outline • Introduction • Design goals • Hwang-Lee-Tang’s scheme (HLT’s scheme) • Discussions on HLT’s scheme • Improved scheme (YRY’s scheme) • Security analysis • Conclusion • Comments http://islab.iecs.fcu.edu.tw

  3. Remote server Introduction ID, PW User Public channel http://islab.iecs.fcu.edu.tw

  4. Brief summary Remote user authentication Modification attacks Lamport, 1981 Using smart cards to eliminate the risk and cost of maintaining verification tables. Hwang-Li, 2000 Efficiency Security http://islab.iecs.fcu.edu.tw

  5. Design goals • Require no password or verification tables in the server side • Solve replay attacks • Choose and change users password freely • Reveal no passwords to the server http://islab.iecs.fcu.edu.tw

  6. IDi, h(PWi) Compute Ai = h(IDi  x)  h(PWi) Smart card (stored h( ), Ai) HLT's scheme (1/3) • Registration phase: Ui Server Choose IDi, PWi Compute h(PWi) http://islab.iecs.fcu.edu.tw

  7. Login phase: Ui Server Compute Bi = Ai  h(PWi) = h(IDi  x) IDi, Ci, T HLT's scheme (2/3) Compute Ci = h(Bi  T) • Authentication phase: Check IDi Check (TT)  T Verify Ci = h(h(IDi  x)  T) http://islab.iecs.fcu.edu.tw

  8. HLT’s scheme (3/3) • Password change phase: Ui Server Compute Bi = Ai  h(PWi) = h(IDi  x) Select PWinew and compute h(PWinew) Compute Ai = Bi  h(PWinew) Store Ai http://islab.iecs.fcu.edu.tw

  9. Discussions on HLT’s scheme • Suppose the intruder has stolen x • expensive to re-compute the secret hash value • Suppose the smart card is stolen • Altered password • Bi = Ai  h(PW) = h(IDi  x)  h(PWi)  h(PW) • Ai = Bi  h(PW) • Denial of service attack • Speed of detecting wrong password is slow • No mutual authentication http://islab.iecs.fcu.edu.tw

  10. IDi, PWi YRY’s scheme (1/3) • Registration phase: Ui Server Choose IDi, PWi Compute Vi = h(IDi, TTSA,x) Compute Ai = h(IDi, TTSA,x)  PWi Smart card (stored h( ), IDi, Vi, Ai) http://islab.iecs.fcu.edu.tw

  11. Login phase: Ui Server Compute Bi = Ai  PWi= h(IDi, TTSA,x) IDi, C1, T YRY’s scheme (2/3) Verify Bi = Vi Compute C1= h(Bi, T) • Authentication phase: Check IDi Check (TT)  T Compute Bi= h(IDi, TTSA,x) Verify C1= h(Bi, T) Check (TT)  T Compute C2= h (Bi, C1,T) C2, T Verify C2= h(Bi, C1,T) http://islab.iecs.fcu.edu.tw

  12. Select PWinew Compute Ai = Bi  PWinew Store Ai YRY’s scheme (3/3) • Password change phase: Ui Server Compute Bi = Ai  PWi= h(IDi, TTSA,x) Verify Bi = Vi http://islab.iecs.fcu.edu.tw

  13. Security analysis Protect from • Forgery attacks • Replay attacks • Impersonation attacks • Deniable of service attacks • Spoofing attacks No body can compute Bi = h(IDi, TTSA,x) even if x is revealed http://islab.iecs.fcu.edu.tw

  14. Conclusion Achieve • No verification table • Freedom in changing password • Elimination of denial of service attacks • Secure hash value • Mutual authentication • Fast detection of wrong input password • Less computational cost http://islab.iecs.fcu.edu.tw

More Related