1 / 9

External review of QA agencies: the role of the students

External review of QA agencies: the role of the students. reflected by Lene Karin Wiberg Student representative, NOKUT evaluation committees. Studentparticipation in institutional accreditation and QA processes in Norway. Student Student representatives ”Customers”

pattik
Télécharger la présentation

External review of QA agencies: the role of the students

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. External review of QA agencies: the role of the students reflected by Lene Karin Wiberg Student representative, NOKUT evaluation committees

  2. Studentparticipationin institutional accreditation and QA processes in Norway • Student • Student representatives • ”Customers” • Full partners in the academic community • Full commitee member

  3. Professor or student in QA processesWhat’s the difference? • Different approach? • Difference of opinion? • Identify different challenges? • Different goals?

  4. External evaluation of QA agencies versus HEI’s What’s the differences? ?

  5. European standards for external evaluation of QA agencies • Use of QA procedures for HE • Mission statements • Independence • Criteria and processes used • Accountability

  6. What’s the challenges with involving students? • Competence required: • Communication skills • academic skills • knowledge of the HE system • … • Legitimacy • Internationalisation • Culture • Personal integrity

  7. If we believe in student value, involving students in external evaluation of higher education as well as of QAAs will be a proof of this • If we don’t believe in student value – why be afraid to try? (As long as we have such a profound belief in the other members’ capasity)

  8. Other important issues • Who are the participating students? • In what parts of the process may students participate? • How does student participation improve evaluations? • How can student participation have influence on mobility? • How can student participation in evaluation of QAA promote student participation in all QAA processes?

More Related