1 / 10

ACC/SCAI – i2 Summit Late Breaking Clinical Trials March 29, 2008

Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Facilities without On-Site Cardiac Surgery: A Report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR). ACC/SCAI – i2 Summit Late Breaking Clinical Trials March 29, 2008. Study Population. MI Presentation. Procedural Success and Complications.

pdove
Télécharger la présentation

ACC/SCAI – i2 Summit Late Breaking Clinical Trials March 29, 2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Facilities without On-Site Cardiac Surgery: A Report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) ACC/SCAI – i2 Summit Late Breaking Clinical Trials March 29, 2008

  2. Study Population

  3. MI Presentation

  4. Procedural Success and Complications

  5. Observed Outcomes: All PCI Patients (P<.0001) (P=0.3560) (P=0.8838) (P<.0001)

  6. Risk Adjusted Outcomes Odds Ratio (OR): outcomes for patients at On-Site (vs. Off-Site) facilities adjusting for site correlations and potential confounding variables

  7. Conclusions • Compared to On-Site PCI centers, Off-Site PCI programs participating in the NCDR: • Have smaller bed capacities. • Are predominantly located in rural and suburban areas. • Have lower annual PCI volume. • Treat a higher percentage of patients who present with subsets of MI (STEMI and NSTEMI). • Have better reperfusion times in primary PCI.

  8. Conclusions • Compared to On-Site PCI centers, Off-Site PCI programs have similar observed: • Procedure success • Morbidity • Emergency surgery rates • Mortality in cases that require emergency surgery • The risk-adjusted mortality rate in Off-Site facilities was comparable to those PCI centers that have cardiac surgery on-site.

  9. Implications • Off-Site PCI centers can provide excellent care to patients – if the program is developed with thoughtfulness and safety. • Our results are derived from PCI programs who have demonstrated a strong commitment to quality and attention to key structure, process, and outcomes measurements. Without such a commitment, similar results might not be achievable.

  10. Implications • The results of our study should not be extrapolated to encourage the wide-spread proliferation of Off-Site PCI programs. • Our study confirms the safety of an Off-Site PCI strategy at centers where rigorous clinical, operator, and institutional criteria are in place and are monitored to assure high quality outcomes.

More Related