1 / 12

Leapfrog Hospital Rewards Program™ Case Study II: New York, Capital District

Leapfrog Hospital Rewards Program™ Case Study II: New York, Capital District. Mark Russo February 2006. Overview. Background History and Stakeholders Market Makeup Market Strategy Challenges Faced Next Steps. Market Success Factors.

penda
Télécharger la présentation

Leapfrog Hospital Rewards Program™ Case Study II: New York, Capital District

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Leapfrog Hospital Rewards Program™Case Study II: New York, Capital District Mark Russo February 2006

  2. Overview • Background • History and Stakeholders • Market Makeup • Market Strategy • Challenges Faced • Next Steps

  3. Market Success Factors • Critical mass of employer participation (covered lives) in specific markets • Active employer and health plan participation in each market • Market champion – Role for HCM / Business Lead • High-level of awareness of LHRP and quality improvement goals among provider community • Engagement of hospitals in market area • Visibility of program and hospital status to consumers

  4. Upstate New York Regional LandscapeAlbany - Schenectady • 11 Community Hospitals • 3 large “Leapfrog” regional employers • GE • Hannaford Brothers • Verizon • 2 Regional Health Plans: Capital District Health Plan and MVP Health Plan • Over 24 month period employers represent • 716 admissions in 5 clinical categories • $3.7MM in spend

  5. Albany/Sch’dy strategy has followed a measured pace • Determine the feasibility of Leapfrog Hospital Rewards Program implementation in Capital District • Engage Hospitals – all regional hospitals (11) have been informed and educated • Engage health plans – Capital District Physicians Health Plan and MVP Health Plan

  6. Hospital LHRP Market Models Before an administration model is chosen, interested employers need to explore a savings analysis, leveraging quality and efficiency data sets… Bridges to Excellence Model Health Plan Model ORYX Vendor NQF/ORYX measures Hospital* Health Plan Leapfrog Price Based Index ALOS & re-admits ORYX Vendor Procedure-specific Effectiveness and Efficiency Scores

  7. Market-specific implementation strategies for purchasers to adopt • Possible strategies • Information only • Information & rewards • Information & consumer incentives • Information, rewards & consumer incentives • Hannaford • information & consumer incentives • Verizon • Information and rewards • GE • TBD – most likely rewards and consumer information

  8. Market Strategy: Hospital Engagement • Employers required data for feasibility study • Determine potential for hospital improvement • Determine rewards potential • Health Plan assistance to gather data unavailable • Leverage local Healthcare Champions to coordinate implementation • Leverage National LF assistance (Measure sets, documentation etc.)

  9. Hospital Engagement • Introduced LHRP in various direct outreach in late 2004 and throughout 2005 • Leapfrog hosted webcast Feb / March to formally introduce the Program • Program follow-up and toolkit sent to hospital CEOs • Commitment Letter – April, 2005 • Telephonic Outreach • Ad hoc meetings (in person) • ORYX Vendor outreach and alignment

  10. Hospital Engagement, Continued • Incentives for participation • Ad hoc meetings and telephonic outreach • Waived participation fees • Data to remain confidential • Local Advertisement • Publicly available data scoring

  11. Implementation Challenges • Critical mass of hospital participation • ORYX Vendor participation • Rewards not definitive • Active health plan participation • Engagement of Hospitals in market area • Visibility of program and hospital status to consumers

  12. Planning for 2006 • Continue engagement with ORYX vendors • Define clear and quantifiable rewards • Leverage Health Plan • Continue to work with hospitals to secure data submissions • Leveraging the market dynamics will help gain momentum

More Related