1 / 45

Descriptors

Descriptors. “frequent flyers” . “help-rejecting complainers”. Descriptors “frequent flyers” “help-rejecting complainers”. egocentric . irresponsible, fickle . “love intoxicated”. emotional hypochondriacs (secondary gain). Sources of Stigma.

penney
Télécharger la présentation

Descriptors

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Descriptors • “frequent flyers” • “help-rejecting complainers”

  2. Descriptors • “frequent flyers” • “help-rejecting complainers” • egocentric • irresponsible, fickle • “love intoxicated” • emotional hypochondriacs (secondary • gain)

  3. Sources of Stigma • Reaction to anger, neediness (countertransference) • The perception of willful treatment resistance • (“help rejecting complainers”)

  4. “Negative Therapeutic Reactions” • Unconscious guilt • Unconscious envy – need to destroy • therapists offerings • Unconscious identification with a • sadistic object • Kernberg, OF 1977

  5. Sources of Stigma • Reaction to anger, neediness (countertransference) • The perception of willful treatment resistance • (“help rejecting complainers”) • Cross-sectional exposure (“frequent flyers”) • Misinformation about heritability and prognosis • Unrealistic expectations of competence • BPDs self concept: “bad”, “evil”, “damaged”, • “small child” (Zanarini et al. 2001)

  6. Consequences of Stigma • avoidance and misinformation by professionals

  7. “Despite its prevalence, enormous public health costs, and the devastating toll it takes on individuals, families, and communities, [borderline personality disorder] only recently has begun to command the attention it requires”. House Resolution 1005, April 1, 2008

  8. Consequences of Stigma • avoidance and misinformation by professionals • under-utilization of the diagnosis (~ 2-6% in one • OPC) • failure to provide adequate didactic training or • capable clinical supervision • lack of parity; fair reimbursement • an “unwanted diagnosis” by patients confirming • their worst fears about themselves

  9. “I dread being diagnosed as borderline. It conveys that I’m malicious and manipulative.”

  10. REPONSES TO DIAGNOSIS OF BPD (N = 30) WORSE BETTER Shame Likability Hope Overall Rubovszky et al.

  11. Psychoeducation for BPD • 30 with workshop about BPD vs. 20 • wait listed • PE decreases impulsivity and unstable • relations over next 12 weeks • - “a useful and cost efficient form of • pre-treatment” • Zanarini & Frankenburg, JPD 2008

  12. Minimal BPD Didactic Training Objectives • (? 6 Hours) • Knowledge of the DSM diagnostic criteria • and their meaning • Awareness of its prognosis and heritability • How to assess and manage deliberate self- • harm and suicidal threats • iv) The role and liabilities of medication • v) The role and outcomes from BPD-specific • therapies

  13. Four Models About the Interface between MDD & BPD And their Implications about Course BPD is Primary: BPD can cause 2 signs and symptoms of MDD; its improvements will be followed by a decrease in MDD MDD is Primary: MDD can cause 2 BPD Phenomenology; its improvements will be followed by a decrease in BPD BPD & MDD are Unrelated: Changes in the course in either disorder will not effect the other Overlapping Etiology: Changes in either disorder will effect the course of the other disorder; but will do so weakly or inconsistently

  14. AD COOCCURRENCE IN BPD No. BPD % with AD % General Type ADNo. StudiesSubjectsAll (CLPS****)Population* MDD** 7 1122 44-53 (50%) 17% Bipolar I*** 8 1006 9 (12%) 1.6% Bipolar II*** 6 436 11 (8%) 2-3% Cyclothymic*** 2 404 4% 1% * Kessler et al., 1994 ** Koenigsberg et al. 1999; Gunderson et al. 2001 *** Paris et al. 2005 * *** McGlashan et al. 2000

  15. BPD COOCCURRENCE IN AD • No. AD • Type ADNo. StudiesSubjects% with BPD • MDD* 6 1005 10-15% • Bipolar I** 12 830 11% • Bipolar II** 3 137 16% • * Koenigsberg et al. 1999; Gunderson et al. 2001 • ** Paris et al., 2005

  16. FAMILY STUDIES Increased Prevalence in Relatives Probands MDD Bipolar I Bipolar II BPD MDD YES*Yes* ? ? Bipolar I Yes*YES*Yes*No Bipolar II Yes Yes*YES ? BPD ? No ? YES *Replicated Family Study data

  17. Cross-lagged Panel Analysis Relating Borderline and Depressive Psychopathology over 3 Years (N = 570) .75*** .78*** .68*** .81*** BOR_6 BOR_B BOR_12 BOR_24 BOR_36 .09* .20*** .17*** .11* .01 .06 .04 .04 DEP_6 DEP_24 DEP_B DEP_12 DEP_36 -.08 .38*** .38*** .33*** Note: BPD = Borderline features, assessed at Baseline (B) and 6, 12, 24 and 36 month follow- alongs; DEP = Depression diagnostic status assessed at these intervals. ***p <.001, **p <.01, *p <.05.

  18. INTERACTIONS OF AXIS I WITH BPD EffectCo-Occurring Axis I Disorder ↓ BPD Course ↓ Axis I Course ↑ Med Use Subst Ab NO YES ? MDD ? YES YES Bipolar NO YES YES ED NO YES ?

  19. MDD and BPD overlap descriptively, but when co-occurring BPD is primary

  20. BPD & BIPOLAR DISORDERS % BPD with Bipolar I & II 20% % Bipolar I with BPD 11% % Bipolar II with BPD 16% % BPD who become bipolar  10% Gunderson et al. 2006

  21. FAMILY STUDIES Increased Prevalence in Relatives Probands MDD Bipolar I Bipolar II BPD MDD YES*Yes* ? ? Bipolar I Yes*YES*Yes*No Bipolar II Yes Yes*YES ? BPD ? No ? YES *Replicated Family Study data

  22. New Onsets of Bipolar I and II in Borderline and Other Personality Disorder Samples BPD (N = 164) OPD (N = 401) Bipolar I 7 (4.3%) 6 (1.8%) Bipolar II6 (3.7%) 6 (1.8%) Bipolar I and II13 (7.9%) 12 (3.1%) * Two patients have onsets of both Bipolar I and II

  23. INTERACTIONS OF AXIS I WITH BPD EffectCo-Occurring Axis I Disorder ↓ BPD Course ↓ Axis I Course ↑ Med Use Subst Ab NO YES ? MDD ? YES YES Bipolar NO YES YES ED NO YES ?

  24. Bipolar D and BPD overlap descriptively, but not familiarly, and when co-occurring BPD is independent

  25. BPD & Bipolar Disorder Diagnoses ∙ Bipolar disorder is frequently overutilized (only 57% were confirmed with SCID) ∙26% of false + Bipolar patients have BPD ∙40% of BPD patients had false + Bipolar dx ∙Overuse of Bipolar dx is 2° to expected response to meds and the extensive marketing of mood stabilizers ∙Underuse of BPD is 2° to it’s lack of a medication–based therapy and its need for psychosocial treatment Zimmerman et al. J Clin Psychiatry Jan 2010

  26. Overview • Treatment of BPD is not done • consistently or well • Most clinicians don’t like treating • BPD patients • There is a shortage of well-trained • BPD treaters

  27. TRENDS IN TREATMENT OF BORDERLINE PERSONALITY DISORDER • From Psychoanalytic Primacy to Multiple Modalities • (notably psychoeducation, cognitive/behavioral and • psychopharmacological)

  28. TRENDS IN TREATMENT OF BORDERLINE PERSONALITY DISORDER • From Psychoanalytic Primacy to Multiple Modalities • (notably psychoeducation, cognitive/behavioral and • psychopharmacological) • From Clinical Expertise to Evidence-based • From Generic to Disorder-specific • From Possible Improvement to Probable Remission

  29. THE FRAMEWORK FOR EXPECTABLE CHANGES Areas of Relevant Expectable Disturbance Interventions Time for Change Subjective state • Concerned attention, Hrs./Weeks Dysphoric feelings validation • Reality testing • Problem solving • Medication Behavior • Clarification (esp. in-Rx months examples) of defense purpose and maladapttive consequences Interpersonal Style • Confrontation 6-18 months • Pattern recognition • Here-and-now interactional analysis Intrapsychic • Defense and transference analysis >2 years Organization • Corrective experiences, real relationships From Gunderson, 2001

  30. BehavioralPSA DBT SFT MBT TFP

  31. DBT • Most influential •Most validated •Most understandable/learned • Most accessible

  32. DBTTFPMBT Behavioral focus+ - - Cognitive focus- - + Transference focus- + - Interpretation- + - Defense analyses - + + Support + - +

  33. Effective Manualized BPD • Treatments Show: • They are better than TAU. • BPD patients require specifiably different and • disorder-specific interventions. • 3. PSA therapy can be manualized – • standardized and replicated (up to a point) • 4. Adherence and competence can be measured and • shown to correlate with effectiveness.

  34. Mentalization: a common theme of all therapies for BPD • All psychotherapies develop an interactional matrix in which the mind becomes a focus • Therapists consider the patient by communicating their representations to them • experience of patient is of another human having their mind in mind  Process more important than content Adapted from Bateman, 2004

  35. Are EBT’s Worth Learning: • Will I do better by my next patient as a • result of the training? • Is the increment of increased effectiveness worth the time and expense of getting trained?

  36. FIVE SHARED CHARACTERISTICS OF EFFECTIVE THERAPIES (DBT, TFP, MBT, SFT) FOR BPD • - Structure (goals, roles) • Coherent theory with trained practitioners (self- • selected) • - Active: support and challenge • - Focus on feelings •  recognition •  sources (chain analyses) •  experiencing • - Countertransference: recognition & management

  37. WHY DO THIS WORK? • Pride in skills (“If you can treat • borderline patients, you can treat • anyone”) • Personal growth • Having a highly personal, deeply • appreciated, life-changing role

More Related