بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

1. بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

2. Population Covered by Donor ADB 1% USAID 34% Uncovered 23% WB 22% EC 18% Others 2%

3. Action Plan for Evaluation and Implementation of Curriculum Development in KMU

4. Evaluation of Practical work in Biochemistry Department By : Assistant Prof. Wasima Sharifi Department of Bio-Chemistry, KMU December 2006

5. Background • Paraclinic subjects are taught in PCB, 1st and 2nd class completely , and beside that some subjects in grade 3rd, 4th, and 5th are also included. • Practical work is an important part of teaching method in Paraclinic (40%) • Evaluation is necessary for feedback for teachers and future planning

6. Using Microscopes: Biology Parasitological Pathology Histology Microbiology Chemistry: Chemistry Biochemistry Anatomy Modules: Anatomy Embryology Forensic Medicine Others: Physiology Pharmacology Public health Physics Practical works and Instruments

7. Practical work room.

8. Anatomy Models

9. Practical work room.

11. Strengths • EDC/JICA • Initiation of teachers for the task • Better background for future Planning Weaknesses • Absence of evaluation experience • Difficulty of skill evaluation fact

12. Opportunities • Assistance of JICA • Eager for better Education system in KMU • A comprehensive and scientific planning for future Threats • Sustainability of the program? • Miss collection and miss interpretation

13. Goal • Improvement of teaching system Objectives • Standardization of teaching method • Strengthening of weak points

14. Time: May 2007 Mid semester, 2 weeks Class 2nd students Random 20 students Distribution, collection and analysis: Dr Sharifi, Prof Anwar, Prof Ahmadzai Items in the questionnaire Punctuality Skill Knowledge General impression Scoring: Satisfactory, fair and not fair Percentage Methods

15. Arigato Gozaimasu Thank you Sharifi

16. Evaluation of Paraclinic lecturers By: Associated Prof. Ehsanullah Alimi MD Head, Department of Forensic Medicine December 2006

17. Introduction • Feedback by students for standardization of education • Total no. of lecturers in KMU 217 • Clinic 151 • Paraclinic 66 • Total no. of departments 33 • Clinic 19 • Paraclinic 14

18. Introduction (cont.) • Criteria for selection of lecturers • MD and higher degrees • 75% Scoring in undergraduate period • No failure records in undergraduate period • Age ( < 35 ) • Recommendation by related Department • Academic entrance exam • Approval of Academic council of KMU • Assignment by MOHE

19. Current Situation • EDC has already collected evaluation data for all lecturers in August 2006 • The data has not been analyzed because of unknown reason

20. Weaknesses • Some negative reaction from lecturers • Absence of evaluation experience • Students will evaluate lecturers in views of reputation (e.g. Strictness will be connected to lower evaluation)

21. Goal • Improvement of teaching system Objectives • Standardization of teaching method • Strengthening of lecturers’ weak points • Motivation of lecturers • Capacity building for lecturers

22. Methods • Modification of the current questionnaire • Every end of semester • Scoring (Good, Fair and not fair) • Calculation of percentage • Sampling of students • Sampling method: • 30 students, randomized

23. Example of a Lecture

24. Implementation Processes • 3 groups of 10 students will be selected arbitrarily from 100 2nd class students • 10 lecturers in 4 departments (biochem, physio, microbio, and pathology) will be evaluated

25. Resources • Personnel: • EDC evaluation committee and administration • Academic Vice Chancellor • Students • Time: • Collection: One week in the end of each semester (July 2007) • Analysis: Quantitative (percentage) by Drs. Alimi, Stanikzai, and Anwar. • Dr. Alimi will report the result to the chancellor, EDC and JICA project office in August 2007

26. Suggestion • All lecturers should be evaluated every year regularly • Students manual for evaluation

27. Arigato Gozaimasu Thank you Alimi

28. Assessment of student By: Prof. Mohammad Afzal Anwar MD Head, Department of Histology December 2006

29. Introduction • Total no. of students 2745 • Faculties 4 • Curative • Pediatric • Stomatology • Nursing • Condition to sit in an examination • Student attendance 75%

30. Evaluation of students in end of semester Final Examination Practical Examination (20%) Theoretical Examination (80%)

31. Current Status • Different departments have different formats of examination papers • Combination of MCQs, SAQs, Essays, etc • Distribution of marks to different sections • Different departments show different failure rates of students

33. Result of Final Examination 100 (absolute score) Succeeded Students 50 (in old system) Failed Students 0

34. Current System Used for 2nd Class or Upper (Not the Credit System) Failed Student subject subject subject Second Chance Failed Student (next year) subject subject Third chance Failed Student (next year)

35. Result of Final Examination 100 (absolute score) Succeeded Students 55% in credit system Failed Students 0

36. Introduction (cont.) • Credit system and conditions: • Currently used for PCB and 1st class • One chance for exam • If failed, must take tutorial • Pass score for a subject in credit system is 55 • The average of all subject scores for credit system is 60

38. Goal • Improvement of examination system Objectives • Standardization of teaching method • Detection of examination weak points • Improvement of questioning system

39. Methods • Collection of papers from different departments • Decide which method was used for each paper (MCQ, SAQ, Essay, etc) • Collection of data • How many students failed • How marks were decided for each question

40. Resources • Personnel: • Dr. Anwar • Examination committee • KMU administration • Time: • End of each semester

42. Arigato Gozaimasu Thank you Prof Anwar

43. Evaluation for Practical works in Clinical Education By: Assistant Prof. Ghulam Sakhi Rawan MD Department of Pediatrics, Maiwand Hospital December 2006

44. Background • Clinical Practical works are taught in class 3rd, 4th, 5th, and house job (internship) • Practical work is an important part of teaching method in clinic (40%) • Evaluation is necessary for feedback for teachers and future planning • practical works: • Students 4 hours/day • House job 7 hours/day for a year

46. Practical works and Instruments • class 3rd: • Physical examination • Thermometer • Sphygmomanometer • Stethoscope • Tongue depressor • Performing IM,SC and IV Injections

47. Practical works and Instruments(cont.) • Class 4th : • Physical examination • Thermometer • Sphygmomanometer • Stethoscope • Fetoscope • NG and rectal tubes and folly catheter • Reading X-Ray films • History taking

48. Practical works and Instruments(cont.) • Class 5th : • Otoscope • Ophthalmoscope • Laryngoscope • Bronchoscope • Casting • Traction and fixation of fractures • Punctures • History taking • Introduction of diseases

49. Practical works and Instruments(cont.) Note: Students are able to do some practical works by themselves but they will only observe other works. • House Job: • Practical works as junior assistant/every dept. • Skin suturing • Dressing

50. Current Status • Some lecturers lack enough skills to teach • Some lecturers are not punctual