1 / 17

Possible beta beam scenario(s) in the US

Possible beta beam scenario(s) in the US. Andreas Jansson Fermilab. Outline. This talk is far from a blueprint for beta beams at US labs! Attempt to look at how US machines could fit into a CERN-like scenario. Basic calculations to investigate which US machines could be utilized.

peter-perkins
Télécharger la présentation

Possible beta beam scenario(s) in the US

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Possible beta beam scenario(s) in the US Andreas Jansson Fermilab Andreas Jansson, Neutrino Workshop, ANL, March 3-4, 2004

  2. Outline • This talk is far from a blueprint for beta beams at US labs! • Attempt to look at how US machines could fit into a CERN-like scenario. • Basic calculations to investigate which US machines could be utilized. Andreas Jansson, Neutrino Workshop, ANL, March 3-4, 2004

  3. CERN site study Decay ring Decay ring Ions generated: 2 1013 s-16He 8 1010 s-118Ne B = 1500 Tm B = 5 T B = 5 T L L = 2500 m = 2500 m ss ss =150 SPL Ions stored: 2 10146He2+ 9 101218Ne10+ (simultaneously in 4+4 10ns bunches) Decay Decay ISOL target Ring Ring & Ion source SPS SPS ISOL linac 100 MeV/u PS PS Storage ring +RCS =9.2 300 MeV/u Andreas Jansson, Neutrino Workshop, ANL, March 3-4, 2004 [Slide from M. Lindroos et al]

  4. CERN Intensities Only b-decay losses accounted for, add efficiency losses (50%) Andreas Jansson, Neutrino Workshop, ANL, March 3-4, 2004 [Slide from M. Lindroos et al]

  5. Different “CERN scenarios” • “Original” based on max SPS field, (He)=150 [Nufact02]. • Both species in machine simultaneously, optimum at (He)=60 and (Ne)=100 [Nufact03] • Higher energies, proposed =600 (upgraded SPS). Relaxes beam requirements [hep-ph/0312068] • Low energy (nuclear physics) [hep-ph/0303222 ] Andreas Jansson, Neutrino Workshop, ANL, March 3-4, 2004

  6. Possible US sites Only considering high energy beta-beams Andreas Jansson, Neutrino Workshop, ANL, March 3-4, 2004

  7. Possible US scenario 8 / 1.2 GeV SC Linac Decay Decay ISOL target Tevatron/ RHIC Ring Ring & Ion source ISOL linac Storage ring? MI/AGS FNAL/ AGS Booster Note that both labs already have an RCS, as proposed for CERN scenario. Both labs also have plans for a SC proton driver linac  Andreas Jansson, Neutrino Workshop, ANL, March 3-4, 2004

  8. Brookhaven machines • Energies are for protons • Proposed 1.2 GeV Linac could be used for RI production Andreas Jansson, Neutrino Workshop, ANL, March 3-4, 2004

  9. Brookhaven machines II * Values are for 6He2+ / 18Ne10+ Andreas Jansson, Neutrino Workshop, ANL, March 3-4, 2004

  10. Some Brookhaven issues • Acceleration efficiency (RHIC) • Associated losses • Low rep rate* • Top energies comparable to CERN SPS (or less)** Upgrade power supplies? *Could perhaps interleave RHIC rings to double rep rate? ** Harmonic numbers also similar to CERN  Andreas Jansson, Neutrino Workshop, ANL, March 3-4, 2004

  11. Fermi machines • Energies are for protons • Proposed 8 GeV Linac could be used for RI production Andreas Jansson, Neutrino Workshop, ANL, March 3-4, 2004

  12. Fermi machines II * Values are for 6He2+ / 18Ne10+ Andreas Jansson, Neutrino Workshop, ANL, March 3-4, 2004

  13. Fermi machines III • Values are for 6He2+ / 18Ne10+, calculated to yield • 1 W/m on average in Tevatron (not based on ion production) Andreas Jansson, Neutrino Workshop, ANL, March 3-4, 2004

  14. Some Fermilab issues • Loss sensitivity of Tevatron (how many RIs can it take all the way to top energy?). • Relatively long acceleration cycle of Tevatron (lower rep rate than SPS). • Activation and shielding of Booster (and other machines). • … + all the non-CERN specific issues Andreas Jansson, Neutrino Workshop, ANL, March 3-4, 2004

  15. Decay ring • CERN baseline version fits on site • For higher gamma, site limits size (more space at BNL). • What direction to experiment (Soudan too far away)? CERN baseline, (He)=150 Scaled to (He)=320 Andreas Jansson, Neutrino Workshop, ANL, March 3-4, 2004

  16. Observations • Both BNL and Fermilab plan for proton drivers that could be used for RI production • If RHIC can be made to ramp significantly faster, BNL site may be comparable to CERN for BB • Main injector can get close to the proposed energies for running both He+Ne simultaneously at CERN. • Using the Tevatron, could achieve higher gammas ! Andreas Jansson, Neutrino Workshop, ANL, March 3-4, 2004

  17. Studies needed for higher gamma • Physics gain from going to Tevatron energies (He=320 and Ne=540 ). • Possible experiments and locations. • Intensity and bunching factor requirements. • More details on efficiencies, loss limits and intensity limits (i.e. can these requirements be met). • Longitudinal gymnastics scheme (need new RF?). • … Andreas Jansson, Neutrino Workshop, ANL, March 3-4, 2004

More Related