1 / 13

Safety and effectiveness of bivalirudin in routine care of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Safety and effectiveness of bivalirudin in routine care of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention . JA Rassen, MA Mittleman, RJ Glynn, A Brookhart, S Schneeweiss

phila
Télécharger la présentation

Safety and effectiveness of bivalirudin in routine care of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Safety and effectiveness of bivalirudin in routine care of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention JA Rassen, MA Mittleman, RJ Glynn, A Brookhart, S Schneeweiss Dept of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham & Women’s Hospital; Depts of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health; Beth Israel Deaconess Eur Heart J, Nov 25, 2009

  2. Objectives • Bivalirudin has been studied as an alternative to heparin plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor during PCI; trials have indicated that bivalirudin is non-inferior to heparin with respect to death and repeat revascularization and may decrease the risk of major bleeds. • To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of bivalirudin as used in routine care (transfusion, repeat PCI and death) • Authors supported by Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, National Institute of Aging, and National Institute of Mental Health 2 Rassen JA et al Eur Heart J 2009 On line ahead of print Nov 25 doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehp437

  3. Methodology: • A total of 127,185 PCI procedures were identified from the database between June 2003 through December 2006 • Patient groups were defined as having received either bivalirudin plus provisional GPIIb/IIIa or the comparator, heparin plus GPIIb/IIIa • Primary outcome: blood transfusion (whole blood, RBC, FFP, platelets, cryoprecipitate) • Secondary outcomes: in hospital mortality and repeat PCI within the same hospital admission Rassen JA et al Eur Heart J 2009 On line ahead of print Nov 25 doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehp437

  4. Patient Population • Patients with their first inpatient admission between • June 2003 and December 2006 in which they underwent PCI • (N= 326 556) • Recorded charge for bivalirudin (+/- GPI) with no heparin OR • Heparin (at least 1000 U) + GPI • Exclusions • Outpatient procedures • Rural hospitals, or those with < 2 PCI/day average • No record of antithrombotic treatment, other antithrombotic regimen or GPI only • History of hemostatic disorders Overall Analysis Population N=127,185 Treated with bivalirudin N=32, 541 (26%) Treated with heparin+ GPI N=94,644 (74%) Data on file. Premier Perspective™ Database. Rassen JA et al Eur Heart J 2009 On line ahead of print Nov 25 doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehp437

  5. Methodology: statistical analysis Adjusted for: • Patients’ socio-demographic factors: age, sex, race, income, and married or living with partner vs. living alone, year of admission, urgent admission basis. • Patient co-morbidities: diabetes, hypertension, liver disease, COPD/asthma, cancer, smoking, old MI, old stroke, endocarditis, ischaemic heart disease, peripheral artery disease, and chronic kidney disease. • Hospital factors: teaching vs. non-teaching status, location (midwest, northeast, south, or west of the USA, and urban/rural), hospital size (number of beds), and high volume hospitals (an average of 10 or more PCIs performed per day). Rassen JA et al Eur Heart J 2009 On line ahead of print Nov 25 doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehp437

  6. Methodology: statistical analysis • Primary analysis: estimated unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios (Cox proportional hazards models); • Secondary analysis: examined cumulative incidence on the risk difference (least squares) and odds ratio (logistic regression) scales. • Sensitivity analyses for urgency of PCI/elective PCI, and for heparin alone group • Instrumental variable analysis conducted using hospital preference for treatment of PCI patients with bivalirudin Rassen JA et al Eur Heart J 2009 On line ahead of print Nov 25 doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehp437

  7. Results • Percentage of hospitals reaching threshold of administering bivalirudin to <5% and >80%of patients receiving PCI, and hospitals administering bivalirudin to >1% of those patients Rassen JA et al Eur Heart J 2009 On line ahead of print Nov 25 doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehp437

  8. Results • By quarter of calendar time, % of PCI patients exposed to bivalirudin in hospitals in the Premier Perspective Database. Rassen JA et al Eur Heart J 2009 On line ahead of print Nov 25 doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehp437

  9. Hazards Ratio ± 95% CI Results: Transfusion* OR (95% CI) Unadjusted 0.93 (0.85–1.00) 0.77 (0.69–0.86) Unadjusted IV subpopulation 0.67 (0.61–0.73) Fully adjusted Bivalirudin Better Heparin + GP IIb/IIIa Inhibitor Better 0.72 (0.12–4.47) Instrumental variable analysis * At least one unit of any blood product 10 Rassen JA et al Eur Heart J 2009 On line ahead of print Nov 25 doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehp437

  10. Hazard Ratio ± 95% CI Results: Repeat PCI OR (95% CI) Unadjusted 0.83 (0.78–0.89) 0.82 (0.76–0.89) Unadjusted IV subpopulation 0.96 (0.90–1.03) Fully adjusted Bivalirudin Better Heparin + GP IIb/IIIa Inhibitor Better 0.83 (0.49–1.40) Instrumental variable analysis 11 Rassen JA et al Eur Heart J 2009 On line ahead of print Nov 25 doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehp437

  11. Hazard Ratio ± 95% CI Results: Death OR (95% CI) • In-hospital mortality rate: bivalirudin 0.8%, 2.1% heparin + GPI Unadjusted 0.57 (0.49–0.65) 0.56 (0.46–0.66) Unadjusted IV subpopulation 0.51 (0.44–0.60) Fully adjusted Bivalirudin Better Heparin + GP IIb/IIIa Inhibitor Better 0.51 (0.34–0.78) Instrumental variable analysis 12 Rassen JA et al Eur Heart J 2009 On line ahead of print Nov 25 doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehp437

  12. Results • Hazard ratio point estimates and standard errors for models of mortality in the Premier and clinical trial databases Rassen JA et al Eur Heart J 2009 On line ahead of print Nov 25 doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehp437

  13. Conclusions • Bivalirudin is protective compared to heparin plus GPI with regard to the risk of blood transfusions and death • Mortality benefit may even exceed trial estimates • Because of conventional analyses’ potential for bias as a result of residual confounding, IVA-based methods, with their known limitations, may help in studying the safety and effectiveness of medications outside the constrained setting of clinical trials. Rassen JA et al Eur Heart J 2009 On line ahead of print Nov 25 doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehp437

More Related