1 / 24

Low- Q 2 Partons in p-p and Au-Au Collisions

Low- Q 2 Partons in p-p and Au-Au Collisions. Tom Trainor ISMD 2005 – Krom ěříž , CR August, 2005. Agenda. Survey of p-p correlations Fragment distributions on (y t , y t ) in p-p Fragment distributions in Au-Au Angular correlations on ( h D ,f D ) in p-p

phuoc
Télécharger la présentation

Low- Q 2 Partons in p-p and Au-Au Collisions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Low-Q2 Partons in p-p and Au-Au Collisions Tom Trainor ISMD 2005 – Kroměříž, CR August, 2005

  2. Agenda • Survey of p-p correlations • Fragment distributions on (yt,yt) in p-p • Fragment distributions in Au-Au • Angular correlations on (hD,fD) in p-p • Angular correlations in Au-Au • pt correlations in p-p and Au-Au QCD from the bottom up

  3. Low-Q2 Partons in p-p Collisions minijet fragments nch=10 √Dr nch Dr/√rref nch=1 1D 2D p-p 200 GeV subtract soft reference pt yt away side same side hadron pt ~ 0.5 GeV/c yt2 yt2 Dr/√rref 0.15 1 6 yt1 pt (GeV/c) string fragments parton fragments minimum-bias: no trigger condition

  4. Analysis Method (yt1,yt2) correlations (h1,h2,f1,f2) correlations (yt,h,f) hD=h1-h2 Dr/√rref Dr/√rref fD=f1-f2 joint autocorrelation on two difference variables in each 2D bin: k xS xD x2 e – bin size average over a on kth diagonal modified Pearson’s coefficient: normalized covariance density a number of correlated pairs ‘per particle’ x1 a+k k autocorrelations can be determined by pair counting or by inversion of fluctuation scale dependence

  5. p-p Correlations on (yt1,yt2) string and parton fragmentation: first two-particle fragment distributions SS AS (except OPAL on x ) LS – like sign US – unlike sign SS – same side string HBT parton Dr/√rref Dr/√rref same-side parton fragmentation restricted to US pairs AS – away side string parton parton away-side parton fragmentation is independent of charge combination Dr/√rref Dr/√rref 10.0 1.0 pt(GeV/c) 0.15

  6. p-p Correlations on (hD,fD) PF local charge and momentum conservation SF joint autocorrelation on two difference variables SF – string fragments LS – like sign US – unlike sign HBT string string fragmentation reflects local measure conservation Dr/√rref Dr/√rref PF – parton fragments parton parton parton away-side parton fragmentation is independent of charge combination HBT Dr/√rref Dr/√rref

  7. Single-particle Fragmentation – I fragmentation functions on logarithmic variables e-e fragmentation functions on transverse rapidity yt – systematic variation described by single model function LEP PETRA e-e xp =pt /Ejet p-p jets: 105, 225, 350, 625 GeV e-e jets: 14, 44, 91 GeV x = ln(1/xp) LEP sampling: not full data! OPAL – 91 GeV TASSO – 14 GeV transverse rapidity yt conventional CDF PRD 68 (2003) 012003 OPAL PLB 247 (1990) 617 Biebel, Nason and Webber hep-ph/0109282 617 ln(pt)

  8. Single-particle Fragmentation – II simple e-e systematics on transverse rapidity  two-particle fragment distribution fit: b distribution e-e upeak p = 2.9 q = 3.55 14, 44, 91 GeV u= slope = 0.41 A = 0.65 ~ independent ofyt,max e-e mode mode: nch and xpeak values from Bethke hep-ex/9812026 unidentified hadrons from unidentified partons

  9. Two-particle Fragment Distributions an approach derived from fragmentation functions one can sketch a two-particle minimum-bias fragment distribution starting with a surface from which fragmentation functions are conditional slices symmetrize the surface to represent fragment-fragment correlations compare to data: general features agree; string fragments appear at small yt construct a surface representing frag- mentation functions vs parton momentum Q/2 US – same side Dyt~x xp≡-ln(xp) nch ytD 4 3 Q/2 2 1 fragment rapidity yt,peak 1 10 STAR preliminary Q/2 (GeV) parton momentum conditional: trigger particle data

  10. Number Correlations on ytyt evolution of fragment distribution with Au-Au centrality 200 GeV p-p 200 GeV Au-Au same-side - US peripheral Dr/√rref Dr/√rref Dr/√rref STAR preliminary central RAA Dr/√rref Dr/√rref Dr/√rref

  11. Jet Morphology Relative to Thrust angular correlations hadron momenta jet thrust axis (parton momentum) z pt2 jth jtf p-p collision axis pt1 jt – transverse momentum relative to jet thrust axis y f x h parton kt jth Dr/√rref most-probable parton Q/2 at right is 1-2 GeV/c, comparable to the intrinsic parton kt jtf

  12. Symmetrized Angular Kinematics remove trigger-associated asymmetry jt scaling (not generally valid) pt1,2,f1,2 independent random variables symmetrize: trigger, associated  particles 1, 2 pt,1 pout f1 pt,part f2 pS /2 pt,2 J. Rak, J. Jia kinematic limit asymmetric: T. Trainor, J. Porter symmetric: remove the trigger/associated asymmetry

  13. Symmetrize | jtf | and | ktf | no small-angle approximation, similar fragment pt same for AS SS pt (GeV/c) pt (GeV/c) 0.15 1 6 0.15 1 6 ytD ytS ytD ytS yt2 yt2 fDAS Dyt Dyt fDSS yt1 yt1 autocorrelation (fD=f12) STAR preliminary

  14. Angular Correlation Measurements AS SS ytS sh sf jt scaling STAR preliminary SS - same side AS - away side sf ktf jth jtf large same-side (h,f) asymmetry

  15. Fragment Asymmetry about Thrust evolution with Q2of soft jet angular asymmetry previously unexplored region! two-particle fragmentation yt cut space ytS pQCD pQCD hi pt combinations determine Q2 of parton interaction jth jtf lo STAR preliminary lo hi no trigger particle • Small-Q2 partons down to 1 GeV are detectable • These softest jets are strongly elongated • in the azimuth f direction in p-p collisions softest jets ever! big non-perturbative effects small Q2 larger Q2 200 GeV p-p 1:1 aspect ratio

  16. Interpretation water drops vrel = 6 m/s contact plane z  hydrodynamics of parton collisions broadened in contact plane (f,pt), narrowed perpendicular to it (h) contact plane z  df dpt low-Q2 fragmentation

  17. Minijet Deformation on (h,f) in Au-Au fragmentation asymmetry reverses – p-p  Au-Au central HI low Q2 p-p h f 130 GeV Au-Au p-p HI peripheral widths sh h low Q2 p-p f minbias p-p Au-Au sf centrality 130 GeV Au-Au mid-central low Q2

  18. The Other kt Broadening interaction between intrinsic kt and momentum transfer q the alignment between parton kts and q determines whether relative azimuth or relative pt of fragments will broaden azimuth broadening pt broadening condition on (yt1,yt2) biases away-side azimuth broadening US yt2 Dr/√rref ytD ytS SS - intrajet kty,1+ kty,2 AS - interjet yt1 pt,part,1 pt,part,2 largest kt effects: small q/2, q/2 -q/2  pt,part,2 pt,part,1 STAR preliminary

  19.  pt  Fluctuations and pt Correlations partons and velocity correlations: how is pt distributed on (h,f)? full STAR acceptance 70-80% autocorrelation variance excess Dr/√rref f STAR preliminary  pt  fluctuations h 20-30% Dr/√rref subtract multipoles fluctuation inversion Dr/√rref centrality 0-5% fluctuation scaling • pt fluctuations invertible to • pt autocorrelations Dr/√rref T. A. Trainor, R. J. Porter and D. J Prindle, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 31 (2005) 809-824; hep-ph/0410182

  20. Compare with p-p pt Autocorrelations p-p 200 GeV minbias p-p 200 GeV nch > 9 CI=LS+US STAR preliminary direct – from pair counting Hijing Au-Au 200 GeV Dr/√rref Dr/√rref 70-80% data Au-Au 200 GeV CD=LS–US Dr/√rref Dr/√rref Dr/√rref net-charge correlations from fluctuation inversion

  21. Model Fits peak amplitudes peak widths red shifts and blue shifts data fit hijing 20-30% fit peak B1 B3 hijing collision centrality Hijing does not predict strong h broadening or negative structure B2 Hijing 70-80% data - fit peak fit residuals quench off quench on 0-10% 0-10% negative structure is unanticipated – what is the origin?

  22. Recoil Response to Parton Stopping red shift: particle production may be from a recoiling source fit data low-x partons 20-30% model peak p-p pt autocorrelation parton fragments STAR preliminary Au-Au 200 GeV fit residuals data - model peak  recoil 80-90% ~ p-p 40-50% red shift bulk medium Au-Au ptautocorrelation STAR preliminary 20-30% 0-5% • Response of medium to minimum-bias parton stopping • Momentum transfer to medium • Velocity structure of medium • Medium recoil observed via same-side pt correlations

  23. Energy Dependence: SPS  RHIC full acceptance STAR CERES NPA 727 (2003) 97 STAR preliminary centrality dramatic increase of pt fluctuations with increasing sNN STAR ! Hijing CERES string structure in Hijing does not appear in Au-Au data

  24. Summary • Precision survey of p-p correlation structure • Model-independent access to low-Q2 partons • Hydrodynamic aspects of parton scattering? • The other kt broadening: pt asymmetry • Low-Q2 partons as Brownian probes of A-A • Dissipation: p-p fragment distributions modified in A-A • Non-pQCD p-p angular correlations modified in A-A • pt correlations: temperature/velocity structure of A-A • Strong disagreement with pQCD Hijing Monte Carlo • Recoil response of A-A bulk medium: viscosity  0

More Related