1 / 76

Heavy Flavours

Heavy Flavours. Federico Antinori INFN Padova - Italy. Introduction. Aim: introduction to heavy flavour production and nucleus-nucleus collisions open flavour only; for quarkonia: E. Scomparin Assume audience familiar with nucleus-nucleus basics I have left out some things, e.g.:

phyllis-martinez
Télécharger la présentation

Heavy Flavours

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Heavy Flavours Federico Antinori INFN Padova - Italy

  2. Introduction • Aim: introduction to heavy flavour production and nucleus-nucleus collisions • open flavour only; for quarkonia: E. Scomparin • Assume audience familiar with nucleus-nucleus basics • I have left out some things, e.g.: • no detailed description of apparatus • no discussion of DD j correlation, intrinsic KT • ... • credits: A Dainese, M Mangano, E Quercigh Federico Antinori - Villa Gualino - May 2005

  3. Contents • Heavy Flavour Decays • Heavy Flavour Production in QCD • Heavy Flavour in p/p-A • Heavy Flavour Fragmentation • D* decays and leading D’s • Heavy Flavour at Tevatron • Heavy Flavour in pp, dAu at RHIC • Heavy Flavours in AA • SPS, RHIC • perspective for LHC • Finale Federico Antinori - Villa Gualino - May 2005

  4. Heavy Flavour Decays

  5. Some zoology... • Lower mass heavy flavour hadrons decay weakly • t ~ ps • ct ~ 100’s µm • weakly decaying states from PDG 2004 summary tables: Federico Antinori - Villa Gualino - May 2005

  6. In UR limit b ~ Lorentz invariant: ... so b ~ independent of g if cos qCM distribution is flat: so, in space, in projection: so: Impact parameter ~ ct primary vertex decay length = L q decay vertex impact parameter = b y d j x b Federico Antinori - Villa Gualino - May 2005

  7. Weak decays of charm W- W+ W+ c c b s’ c s’ e+ µ+ u ne nµ d’ • typically: • large branching ratio to kaons: • D+: • D+  K-+X BR ~ 28 % • “golden” channel: D+ K-p+p+ BR ~ 9% • D0: • D0 K-+X BR ~ 50% • “golden” channels: D0 K-p+ BR ~ 4% ; D0 K-p+p+p- BR ~ 7% • W± branchings: • large semileptonic branching ratio, varies with heavy flavour particle, typical ~ 10% ~ 10% heavy flavour hadrons give in final state an e± (and ~ 10% a µ±) (and with a respectable pT...) C = “Cabibbo angle” (similarly: )

  8. Standard experimental tools WA92: Si µstrips primary vertex decay length = L q decay vertex impact parameter = b [Adamovich et al.: NIM A 379 (1996) 252] • Silicon vertex detectors: • so: tracks from heavy flavour weak decays typically “miss” primary vertex by ct ~ 100’s µm • impact parameter resolutions of typical heavy flavour apparatus ~ 10’s µm • e± and/or µ ± identification • charged kaon identification Federico Antinori - Villa Gualino - May 2005

  9. Heavy Flavour Production in QCD

  10. Heavy Flavour hadro-production in pQCD a=q Q b=q Q • Factorization: (at sufficiently large Q2) hadron charmed hadron hadron parton distribution functions xa = momentum fraction of parton a in hadron A cross-section at parton level e.g.: fragmentation z = fraction of c momentum to hadron D cross-section at hadron level Federico Antinori - Villa Gualino - May 2005

  11. factorization implies: • PDFs can be measured with one reaction... • say: Drell-Yan: A+B  e+e- + X ... and used to calculate a different one • say: heavy-flavour production • fragmentation independent of the reaction (e.g.: same in pp, e+e-) Federico Antinori - Villa Gualino - May 2005

  12. Parton Distribution Functions • The PDFs vary depending on the momentum transfer scale Q2 • Intuitively: higher Q2 -> higher resolution high-x parton -> lower-x partons • The Q2 evolution of the PDFs can be calculated in pQCD • Altarelli-Parisi evolution (DGLAP) Federico Antinori - Villa Gualino - May 2005

  13. Leading-order (LO) q Q Q g g Q g q g Q Q Q Q g Q g • Relevant diagrams: pair creation • qq QQ (quark-antiquark annihilation) • gg QQ (gluon-gluon fusion) Federico Antinori - Villa Gualino - May 2005

  14. A few results • the partonic cross-section decreases with energy • faster for qq than for gg (which therefore is expected to dominate, except near threshold) • the parton luminosities near threshold increase with energy, the cross section increases with the energy of the hadron-hadron collision • the pair cross section is proportional to: y (y): rapidity of Q (Q) • Q and Q therefore expected to be close in y • Experimentally: EHS, 360 GeV p-p  DDX Federico Antinori - Villa Gualino - May 2005 [EHS: PLB 123 (1983) 98]

  15. Next-To-Leading-Order (NTLO) Q Q Q Q Q Q • in absolute value, LO cross sections are typically underestimated by factor 2.5 - 3 (“K factor”) • at NTLO: additional diagrams, such as: higher order corrections to pair creation flavour excitation gluon splitting Federico Antinori - Villa Gualino - May 2005

  16. the agreement with experiment for the total cross-section is good (within large bands...) • e.g.: charm cross section at fixed target: [Mangano: hep-ph/9711337] Federico Antinori - Villa Gualino - May 2005

  17. results depend on the values of: • mc, µR (renormalization scale), µF (factorization scale) • the result of an exact calculation would be independent of the choice of the scale parameters µR, µF • the residual scale dependence is a measure of the accuracy of the calculation • e.g.: for b production at Tevatron (µR=µF=µ): [Mangano: hep-ph/9711337]

  18. Q Q Q Q • it is important to match the PDFs with the order of the calculation. • e.g. one must avoid double counting: • at LO: • at NTLO: “intrinsic flavour” “flavour excitation” Federico Antinori - Villa Gualino - May 2005

  19. Heavy Flavour in p/p-A

  20. Nuclear shadowing antishadowing shadowing SPS RHIC LHC • PDFs in the nucleus different from PDFs in free proton • R = ratio of nuclear to nucleon PDFs • from Deep Inelastic Scattering (e-+p; e-+A), Drell-Yan (p+p, p+A -> l +l -+X) e.g.: R for gluons vs gluon momentum fraction x from EKS parametrization [Eskola et al.: EPJ C9 (1999) 61] • typical x for cc production (y 0) • x  10-1 @ SPS • x  10-2 @ RHIC • x  a few 10-4 @ LHC Federico Antinori - Villa Gualino - May 2005

  21. Nuclear dependence • From pQCD one expects the cross section for production off nuclei to increase like number of nucleon-nucleon collisions (“binary collision scaling”) • proportional to number of nucleons (for min. bias collisions): • modulo shadowing effects, expected to be small • Experimentally: not far... e.g. WA82: • D production in p-+W/Si at SPS (340 GeV beam momentum) • (relatively) central production with a =1 “Feynman’s x” Federico Antinori - Villa Gualino - May 2005

  22. Caveats... with • i) a = 1 does not work down to pp! • e.g.: MacDermott & Reucroft [PLB 184 (1987) 108] compare pA results with earlier hydrogen data from NA27, good agreement using: • note: similar situation for light flavours! systematic study by Barton et al. [PRD 27 (1983) 2580], for various reactions at 100 GeV FT e.g.: central for production of p, K, p from p on nuclear targets: Federico Antinori - Villa Gualino - May 2005

  23. ii) lower a at large xF? • early beam dump experiments, sensitive at large xF (max acceptance for xF 0.5) (in tracking experiments, typically max. acceptance for xF 0.2) e.g. WA78 [Cobbaert et al.: PLB 191 (1987) 456] a for muons escaping dump (p-A at 320 GeV FT ): • note: a is known to decrease with xF for light hadrons [Barton et al.: PRD 27 (1983) 2580] Federico Antinori - Villa Gualino - May 2005

  24. Heavy Flavour Fragmentation

  25. Fragmentation • String fragmentation model: (e.g. [PYTHIA hep-ph/0308153]) • as coloured quarks fly away, energy is stored in the field: • above a certain distance it is cheaper to break the string by creating a new qq pair than to keep increasing the distance • the string snaps, e.g.: the heavy quark ends up “hadronising” together with a light antiquark • the newly created quarks are of course light • estimated ratios: u : d : s : c  1 : 1 : 0.3 : 10-11 • no heavy flavour production in string breaking! k 1 GeV/fm Federico Antinori - Villa Gualino - May 2005

  26. Fragmentation function Peterson (e = 0.015) Colangelo-Nason (a = 0.9, b=6.4) • c  D, D takes fraction z of c momentum • fragmentation function: DD/c(z) • depends only on fraction z • e.g.: Peterson Colangelo-Nason e.g.: (parameters from fits to charm production at LEP) Federico Antinori - Villa Gualino - May 2005

  27. Q Q e- Z0 e+ • How to measure the fragmentation function? • we don’t measure the original Q momentum ... • but in e+e- we do know the Q energy (by energy conservation!) • e.g.: • fragmentation functions are usually extracted from e+e- measurements and then used for other collisions Federico Antinori - Villa Gualino - May 2005

  28. e.g.: fits to charm x = 2E/s distributions in e+e-: [Cacciari & Greco: PRD55 (1997) 7134] • very similar parameters at the two energies (as expected) Peterson fragmentation s = 10.6 GeV (ARGUS) s = 91.2 GeV (OPAL) e = 0.015 (OPAL) e = 0.019 (ARGUS) Federico Antinori - Villa Gualino - May 2005

  29. Q Q • like for the PDFs, the fragmentation function has to be matched to order of pQCD calculation • e.g. at NTLO the Q can radiate: • so final energy before non-perturbative part of fragmentation lower than at LO • harder fragmentation at NTLO • at NTLO: e 0.015 • at LO: e 0.06 (e.g.: [Cacciari & Greco: PRD55 (1997) 7134]) Peterson fragmentation e = 0.015 (NTLO) e = 0.06 (LO) Federico Antinori - Villa Gualino - May 2005

  30. D* decays and leading D’s

  31. D* decays • Most of the D mesons (from spin counting, ~ 75%) are not directly produced at hadronization, but in D* decays • D±, D0 J=0 • D*±, D*0 J=1 • Due to fine tuning of the values of the masses: • m(D±) + m(p0) < m(D*±) • m(D0) + m(p±) < m(D*±) • m(D0) + m(p0) < m(D*0) but... • m(D±) + m(p±) > m(D*0) • ... the light quark content of charged D is preserved also in case of resonance decays: • a D0(cu) can originate from either D*0(cu) or D*+(cd) • a D+(cd) can only originate from a D*+(cd) Federico Antinori - Villa Gualino - May 2005

  32. Leading effects in D production [WA82: PLB 305 (1993) 402] • From perfect factorization one would expect: • fractions of different charm hadrons independent of collision system • as many D- as D+ • but with a p- beam, at forward xF : D- > D+ • e.g. WA82, p-+W : • excess particularly pronounced at large xF • if c can hadronize not only by fragmentation, but also by valence quark recombination (sounds familiar?) then ... with p- (ud) beam, c D-(cd) >c D+(cd) (especially at large xF...) • can’t do the same with D0(cu), since, as just discussed, it could come from D*+(cd) • Qualitatively reproduced by PYTHIA

  33. ... so factorization not the full story... Federico Antinori - Villa Gualino - May 2005

  34. D0/D+ ratio at LEP • D*0 and D*+ both decay strongly into D’s, but: • D*+ can decay to both D0 and D+ • D*0 can only decay to D0 • From spin degeneracy one expects: D0 : D+ : D*0 : D*+ = 1 : 1 : 3 : 3 • ... and therefore a large D0/D+ ratio • using the experimental branching ratios: • but experimentally, at LEP: a puzzle.... [ALEPH: EPJ C16 (2000) 597] Federico Antinori - Villa Gualino - May 2005

  35. Heavy Flavour at Tevatron

  36. Beauty at Tevatron • Discrepancy between pQCD and data seems to have disappeared... • from... a factor 5.5 (but only 1.6 s ...) • to... Run 0 [CDF: PRL 68 (1992) 3403] Spectrum of J/y from secondary B decays Run II [Cacciari et al: JHEP 0407 (2004)] Federico Antinori - Villa Gualino - May 2005

  37. From run I on, important improvements in accuracy: • experiment (vertex detectors, high statistics) • prediction (post-HERA PDF sets) • Levels of stability over time: • no large room for new physics any more... • for more see, e.g.: [Cacciari et al: JHEP 0407 (2004) 033, Cacciari: hep-ph/0407187, Mangano: hep-ph/0411020] Data Predictions from [Cacciari et al: JHEP 0407 (2004) 033] Federico Antinori - Villa Gualino - May 2005

  38. What about charm? • Nice data from CDF run II • roughly in agreement with full pQCD calculation (though prediction somewhat low) [CDF: Phys.Rev.Lett. 91 (2003) 241804] • A curiosity (?): good agreement between data and prediction for bare quark [Vogt: talk at SQM 2004] Federico Antinori - Villa Gualino - May 2005

  39. Heavy Flavour in pp, dAu at RHIC

  40. pp, dAu at RHIC • Two types of measurements: • full reconstruction of D, D* decays (STAR) • subtraction of non-charm components from electron spectra (STAR, PHENIX) Federico Antinori - Villa Gualino - May 2005

  41. Full reconstruction in dAu (STAR) • Experimental technique: • tracks from TPC • K, p identification from dE/dx (at low pT) • no separation of D decay vertex • large combinatiorial background evaluated by event mixing and subtracted Extracted pT spectrum [STAR: J.Phys. G30 (2004) 809] Federico Antinori - Villa Gualino - May 2005

  42. Non-photonic electrons in pp, dAu • Identified electron spectra • STAR: dE/dx in TPC (+ TOF cuts at low pT) • PHENIX: combined RICH and E/p (with E from EM cal) • Rejection of non-charm electrons • Main source of electrons: “photonic” • g e+e- conversions • Dalitz decays p0 e+e-g • Dalitz decays h e+e-g • STAR: • rejected by full invariant mass analysis of e+e- combinations • PHENIX: • pp run: estimated by simulation and subtracted • dAu run: measured by “converter method” and subtracted • Other sources of non-charm electrons: • w, r, j, K decays • estimated by sim. and subtracted (in both STAR and PHENIX) (“internal conversions”)

  43. RHIC pp, dAu vs pQCD • direct reconstruction • an excess, again? • “non-photonic” electrons • much less evident... band: pQCD charm + beauty PHENIX: pp STAR: dAu (scaled to pp by number of binary collisions) [Cacciari, Nason, Vogt: hep-pe/0502203] Federico Antinori - Villa Gualino - May 2005

  44. ... the situation is somewhat confusing ... • bare c ds/dpT must be multiplied by 4 to reproduce STAR d-Au D data CDF STAR M. van Leeuwen - STAR plot by R. Vogt • bare c ds/dpT (upper curves) agrees reproduces CDF D data with no rescaling...  good measurement of pp baseline at RHIC, LHC essential ! Federico Antinori - Villa Gualino - May 2005

  45. Heavy Flavours in AA

  46. c, b as AA probes • c, b produced in early stages of collision, then conserved (neglecting annihilation)  ideal probes of bulk, strongly interacting phase • e.g.: energy loss? • thermal production? • no extra production at hadronization  ideal probes of fragmentation • independent string fragmentation vs recombination • + important measurement for “practical” reasons • open QQ production (not Drell-Yan) natural normalization for QQ studies • B meson decays non negligible source of non-prompt J/y QUARK-GLUON PLASMA AND PRODUCTION OF LEPTONS, PHOTONS AND PSIONS IN HADRONIC COLLISIONS E.Shuryak, Yadernaya Fizika 28 (1978) 403 Federico Antinori - Villa Gualino - May 2005

  47. Heavy flavour production in AA • binary scaling: can be broken by: • initial state effects (modified PDFs) • shadowing • kT broadening • gluon saturation (colour glass) (concentrated at lower pT) • final state effects (modified fragmentation) • parton energy loss • violations of independent fragmentation (e.g. quark recombination) (at higher pT) Federico Antinori - Villa Gualino - May 2005

  48. Heavy Flavours at SPS, RHIC

  49. Excess of charm-like dimuons (NA50) Peripheral Central • Excess of dimuons over known sources in the mass region below the J/y, especially pronounced in central events • Charm enhancement? (~ x 3 required) • Thermal dimuons?  NA60 repeating measurement with a pixel vertex detector Federico Antinori - Villa Gualino - May 2005

  50. but at RHIC ... 1/TABEdN/dp3 [mb GeV-2] PHENIX • “non photonic” e± • subtracted by converter method • only expected source is c semi-leptonic decay • ~ agreement with Ncoll-scaled Phenix pp reference • (deviates at high pT) • no sign of enhancement! Federico Antinori - Villa Gualino - May 2005

More Related