1 / 17

Choosing Atrium Lighting in the new Graduate School of Business Knight Management Center

Choosing Atrium Lighting in the new Graduate School of Business Knight Management Center. Group 10 Rachel Martin David Mount Leah Strickman Emma Wendt. Overview. Existing atrium decision process Atrium lighting as project focus Recommended decision process: MACDADI Organizations Goals

phyllismontgomery
Télécharger la présentation

Choosing Atrium Lighting in the new Graduate School of Business Knight Management Center

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Choosing Atrium Lighting in the new Graduate School of Business Knight Management Center Group 10 Rachel Martin David Mount Leah Strickman Emma Wendt

  2. Overview • Existing atrium decision process • Atrium lighting as project focus • Recommended decision process: MACDADI • Organizations • Goals • Preferences • Options • Analysis • Value • Innovations

  3. We speculate atrium selection is problematic Midterm: Pre-data Atrium Current State Narrative No Stakeholder goals up front Few options provided Stakeholders engaged late; act as designers

  4. We focus our project on lightingActual atrium selection is even more problematic than we suspected Atrium Current State Narrative Atrium appears in the architect’s plans We changed our project to a more detailed decision The Atrium Lighting Decision Midterm: Post-data

  5. Narrator model from architect Thorough atrium lighting design process, but stakeholders not included Architect’s Atrium Lighting Decision

  6. Our Future State Narrative Stakeholders matter Atrium Lighting Decision Future State Narrative Narrator link

  7. Designers Stakeholders Owner Students Staff Donors Owners Designers Faculty Community MACDADI ModelOrganizations Stakeholdersmatter MACDADI Model →Organizations * Goals * Preferences * Options * Analysis * Value

  8. MACDADI ModelClarify goals to clarify design decision MACDADI Model → Organizations *Goals* Preferences * Options * Analysis * Value

  9. MACDADI ModelWeighting preferences shows economics and owners matter most MACDADI Model → Organizations * Goals *Preferences* Options * Analysis * Value

  10. MACDADI ModelDesigners generate 3 options 0 Sawtoothes 6 Sawtoothes 3 Sawtoothes MACDADI Model → Organizations * Goals * Preferences *Options* Analysis * Value

  11. MACDADI ModelAnalysis - Outlined ratings for 3 goals Rating Goal 1: Promotion of Academic Excellence MACDADI Model → Organizations * Goals * Preferences * Options *Analysis* Value

  12. MACDADI ModelAnalysis – 6 and 3 panels similarly and better MACDADI Model → Organizations * Goals * Preferences * Options *Analysis* Value

  13. MACDADI ModelValue MACDADI Model →Organizations* Goals * Preferences * Options * Analysis * Weights * Value

  14. Innovation Weighted the opinions of different stakeholders to acknowledge the relative importance of each MACDADI Model → Organizations * Goals *Preferences* Options * Analysis * Value

  15. Innovation Weight stakeholders – owners and economics become more important MACDADI Model → Organizations * Goals *Preferences* Options * Analysis * Value

  16. Innovation Weight stakeholders – final design doesn’t change MACDADI Model → Organizations * Goals * Preferences * Options * Analysis *Value

  17. Summary • Consider stakeholders • Weight stakeholder preferences • Recognize economics can still be most important goal • Choose 6-sawtooth option

More Related