1 / 22

Belle results on Lepton Flavor Violation in tau decays

Belle results on Lepton Flavor Violation in tau decays. K. Inami (Nagoya Univ.) for Belle collaboration. B-factory at KEK. KEKB: e + (3.5 GeV) e - (8GeV) s ( tt )~0.9nb, s (bb)~1.1nb A B-factory is also a t -factory!. Peak luminosity: 2.1x10 34 cm -2 s -1

phyre
Télécharger la présentation

Belle results on Lepton Flavor Violation in tau decays

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Belle results onLepton Flavor Violationin tau decays K. Inami (Nagoya Univ.) for Belle collaboration

  2. B-factory at KEK KEKB: e+(3.5 GeV) e-(8GeV) s(tt)~0.9nb, s(bb)~1.1nb A B-factory is also a t-factory! Peak luminosity: 2.1x1034 cm-2s-1 World highest luminosity! Belle Detector: Good track reconstruction and particle identifications Lepton efficiency:90% Fake rate : O(0.1) % for e O(1)% for μ

  3. Luminosity history Integrated luminosity: >1000 fb-1 ⇒~109 BB and t-pairs Belle is finished in 2010/6/30. Belle-II upgrade started.  Analysis with full data sample is on going.

  4. Lepton Flavor Violation in tau decay g SUSY is the most popular candidate among new physics models ~ ~ t ℓ t naturally induce LFV at one-loop due to slepton mixing e or m ~ c0 tlg mode has the largest branching fraction in SUSY-Seesaw (or SUSY-GUT) models When sleptons are much heavier than weak scale Higgs (h/H/A) m m s s LFV associated with a neutral Higgs boson (h/H/A) t e or m Higgs coupling is proportional to mass ⇒mm or ss (h, h’and so on) are favored and B.R. is enhanced more than that of tmg. To distinguish which model is favored, all of decay modes are important.

  5. t e e t generic t decay 1 prong + missing (tag side) mmm(signal side) 3s ellipse: blinded region Sideband region m Analysis procedure m m • e+e-gt+t- Br~85% Fully reconstructed Signalextraction:mmmm-DEplane Blind analysis ⇒Blind signal region Estimate number of BG in the signal region using sideband data and MC

  6. p- p+ p- signal n n _ qq e+ e- e- g • Neutrino(s) in tag side • Particle ID • Mass of mesons e+ e- • many • tracks e+ LFV t decays; Signal and Background 2photon process tt f=leptons,quarks • Neutrinos in both side • Missing energy in signal side radiative Bhabha process

  7. Simple Hard Analysis strategy • Rare decay searches • Need to understand background and reduce as much as possible • tℓℓℓ • tℓKs • tℓV0(hh’) • tℓP0(gg) • tℓhh’ • tℓg • Analyze the modes from simple selection to hard for background reduction • Provide feedback to next analysis of similar final state Difficulty of reducing the background

  8. Search for t3leptons e-e+e- m-m+m- e-m+m- m-e+m- e-m+e- m-e+e- Phys.Lett.B 687,139 (2010) • Data: 782fb-1 • No event is found in the signal region. • Almost BG free • Because of good lepton ID • Br<(1.5-2.7)x10-8 at 90% CL.

  9. p p q q Search for ℓV0(=r0,K*0,w,f) • Search with 854fb-1 data sample • Select one lepton and two hadrons • Require invariant mass to be a vector meson mass • The requirement reduces background rather easily. • Possible background • For ℓ=m, hadronic tau decay and qq with miss m-ID • For ℓ=e, 2photon process could be large BG. • It turns out that not only 2photon process but also ee+X process become large background.  Reduced using missing-momentum direction data r 2photon BG g* signal MC (er0) e- g* e+ Mpp g (missing) tt and qq MC

  10. Result for ℓV0(=r0,K*0,w,f) • After event selection • 1 eventmf, mK*0, mK*0 • 0 events others No signal compared to expected BG Expected number of background (0.1-1.5) events Br(tℓV0) < (1.2-8.4)x10-8 Phys.Lett.B 699,251 (2011)

  11. Search for ℓhh’ Updated this summer • Update with 854fb-1 data • BaBar; Br<(7-48)x10-8 at 221fb-1 • 14 modes are investigated (h,h’=p± and K±) • t-→ℓ-h+h’-: 8 modes (lepton flavor violation) • t-→ℓ+h-h’-: 6 modes (lepton number violation) miss-ID as K+ miss-ID as K+ e+ signal generic tt BG e- e- or m- p- p- p- p- n p+ n K+ g signal side g p0 t- t- t- e+ e+ e+ e- e- e- tag side t+ t+ t+ Also, qq events can be BG n n n Missing momentum can help to reject this kind of BGs since signal has n only on tag side.

  12. Result for ℓhh’ In the signal region 1event : in m+p-p- and m-p+K- no events: in other modes ⇒ no significant excess 予想される背景事象 (0.1-1.5)events Set upper limits at 90%CL: Br(tℓhh’)< (2.0-8.6)x10-8 (preliminary)

  13. Upper limits on LFV t decays Updated this summer Under studying with full data sample

  14. Effect to physics models • Experimental results have already ruled out some parts of the parameter space. • Exclude large tanb, small SUSY/Higgs mass • Accessing other models and other parameter space Undetectable

  15. Future prospects Belle-II will produce >1010 tau leptons. Sensitivity depends on BG level. Recent improvement of the analysis (BG understanding, intelligent selection)  Improve achievable sensitivity B(tmmm)~O(10-10) at 50ab-1 Improvement of BG reduction is important. Beam BG Signal resolution Old estimation New estimation

  16. Summary Search for LFV t decays using ~109t decays 48 modes have been investigated. No evidence is observed yet. Upper limits on branching ratio around O(10-8) B(tmmm)<2.1x10-8, Br(tmV0) < (1.2-8.4)x10-8 B(tmhh’) < (2.1-8.6)x10-8, Br(tLh) < (2.8-4.2)x10-8 etc. Exploring some new-physics parameters space. Update tmg/eg with full data sample (~1000fb-1) Optimization for BG reduction is important for future experiment Belle-II try to obtain the sensitivity of O(10-9~10).

  17. Result for tℓP0(=p0,h,h’) (2.1-4.4) times more stringent results than previous Belle result (401fb-1)

  18. eK*, eK*, er modes g-conversion generic tt MC data Other BG for eK*, eK* and er ⇒ Event with g conversion For example, eK*mode t-p-p0n with g conversion from p0 Mee with e-K+ n p- Fake K* e+ as miss KID P(K+) (GeV) g e- τ- g p0 Require large invariant mass of e+e- candidate, to reduce the BG overlap dE/dx region between e and K eK* MC

  19. Search for Lh • 4 modes are searched for. (h=pand K) • t-→Lh-: (L-B) conserving decay • t-→Lh-: (L-B) violating decay • Current upper limits • Belle Br<(7.2-14)x10-8 @ 154fb-1 • BaBar Br<(5.8-15)x10-8 @ 237fb-1 (no search for LK on Belle) updatewith 906fb-1 @Belle p+ p- p- p signal Generic tt BG p qqBG p- p- p- p- g signal side g L L t- t- Ks0 p0 e+ e+ e+ e- e- e- p0 misid as L tag side t+ t+ p g g n n

  20. BG rejection for Lh To reduce tt BG including KS0 ⇒ reconstruct KS0 and reject events that are likely to be KS0 qq MC A half of Ks0 BG events are rejected. To reduce qqBG including L ⇒ reject events with a proton in tag side (due to BN conservation, the events including a L tend to have baryon on tag side.) qq MC p A third of qq BG events are rejected.

  21. Results of Lh (preliminary) In the signal region no camdodate event are found ⇒ no significant excess 0 2.3 0 2.2 0 2.2 0 2.1 Set upper limits@90%CL: Br(t-gLp-)<2.8x10-8 Br(t-gLK-)<3.1x10-8 Br(t-gLp-)<3.0x10-8 Br(t-gLK-)<4.2x10-8 (L-V) cons. (L-V) viol. (preliminary) Around x(2-3) improvement from the previous BaBar results

More Related