1 / 16

FD05 Pavement Evaluation Process

Streamlining the pavement evaluation process for effective maintenance planning, budget allocation, and project prioritization in transportation infrastructure management.

piera
Télécharger la présentation

FD05 Pavement Evaluation Process

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FD05 Pavement Evaluation Process Operations and Pavement Management Branch

  2. Previous FD05 Evaluation Process • Districts submitted list of projects to Central Office for evaluation. • Pavement Management engineers performed visual assessments of pavement distresses. • Rideability values were collected using laser profilers. • Projects were ranked according to year of recommended treatment and total distress points.

  3. Problems with Previous Process • Some pavements occasionally slipped through the cracks and were not submitted for evaluation. • Could not develop deterioration models. • Process did not provide a method to identify potential preventive maintenance candidates.

  4. Current Process Overview • All MP sections are evaluated on a 3-year cycle (with some exceptions). • Scores from previous year evaluations are increased to account for deterioration. • Districts can add more points to sections to account for other issues or excessive deterioration since evaluation. • Meetings are held with Districts to prioritize projects after evaluations have been completed.

  5. Benefits to New Process • Eliminates need to provide annual list of pavements for evaluation. • Pavements that might have been overlooked previously will be evaluated on a regular basis. • Data can be used to develop performance models. • Provides guidance for identifying preventive maintenance opportunities.

  6. Process Details • Each spring, a list of all MP pavements is provided to the district with their current deterioration score. • Sections that are already planned for resurfacing and those that are scheduled to be evaluated in the current year are identified on the list. • At the request of the District, additional sections can be evaluated.

  7. Process Details (cont.) • At the end of the summer, a new list will be provided which ranks projects by year of recommended treatment and total distress points. • As needed, projects may be removed from the list by the District as upcoming construction or other issues dictate. • Once projects have been prioritized, District personnel provide estimated costs to Central Office. • Central Office determines district budget allotment and submits resurfacing program to State Highway Engineer for approval.

  8. FD05 District Allotment Factors • Total Budget Available • Lane Miles • Average Cost of Asphalt • Average Rideability • Miles Needing Resurfacing • Cost Estimates

  9. FD05 Budget Issues • Total MP Mileage is approximately 13,400 miles. • Need to resurface about 1,150 miles per year. • Current average cost per mile is $145,000. • Total Annual Need is $166.7 million. • FY2014 budget was approximately $110 million + $35 addl • Current Total Need is $494 million. • FY2014 budget would cover about 1/4 of total need.

  10. FD05 Budget Issues • Current backlog requires diligent oversight of FD05 budget. • If projects come in under estimated cost, additional projects may be completed in that district (as identified in original priority list). • Projects coming in under cost do not become eligible for more significant treatments.

  11. Questions?

More Related