240 likes | 355 Vues
This paper by Jim Peach discusses the evolution of data delivery systems from the 1930s to the early 2000s, focusing on the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) and its improvements over the decades. It outlines key developments, such as the transition from tape systems to modern methods, while presenting a wish list for future enhancements. Key suggestions include improved regional projections, robust software for data analysis, and the need for a comprehensive North American data bank to facilitate better economic analysis and regional insights.
E N D
Data, Data, Data:Progress and a Wish List Jim Peach Department of Economics and International Business and Office of Policy Analysis, Arrowhead Center New Mexico State University email: jpeach@nmsu.edu
Real GDP Per Capita: 1929-2005Chained 2000 Dollars 37241 CAGR=2.24 7099
Just go to …. How good is BEA?
A Wish List • Restart the OBERS/BEA Regional Projections
Downloadable for any region Free (Greedy aren’t I?) Improved software RIMS III
Gross State Product • Quarterly • Gross Regional Product • MSAs
Per Capita Income as Percent of US: Yuma, AZ NAFTA IMPLEMENTATION
The ACCRA indices are useful, but … Enough said – Not BEA’s problem alone Regional Price Indices
No, not the North American Development Bank We need a NORTH AMERICAN DATA BANK NOT JUST NAICS MISSED OPPORTUNITY IN NAFTA NEGOTIATIONS NADB
BEA, CENSUS, BLS, USITC, …. I know, we have FedStats, but … One Stop Shop (on-line)