220 likes | 350 Vues
This presentation by Dr. Marie L. Radford, explores how focus groups (FG) serve as valuable assessment tools in library planning. Conducted at the ALA conference, it covers the entire FG process: planning, conducting, analyzing, and reporting results. Advantages such as unique insights and comprehensive opinions are highlighted, alongside challenges like the need for skilled moderators and time constraints. Practical examples from Rutgers University and Brooklyn Public Library illustrate how FG findings can shape strategic decisions and enhance library services.
E N D
Focus Groups as Assessment Tools Marie L. Radford, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Rutgers University mradford@scils.rutgers.edu LAMA/MAESUsing Measurement Data for Library Planning & Assessment Committee “Got Data, Now What? Analyzing Focus Groups and Usability Study Results” ALA, Chicago, June 26, 2005
Participants • How many have conducted FG & have data to analyze? • How many are planning FG? • How many are considering FG? • How many are skeptical of value of FG?
AGENDA • Phase 1: Planning • Phase 2: Conducting Focus Groups • Phase 3: Analysis of Focus Group Data • Phase 4: Reporting Results • Using Focus Group Results in Strategic Planning
What is a Focus Group? “A focus group is an in-depth, face-to-face interview of a group of 8 to 12 people representing some target group and centered on a single topic.” (Zweizig, Johnson, Robbins, & Besant, 1996)
Advantages of Using FG for Strategic Planning • In-depth understanding of experiences & meanings. • Better data – synergy created: • Comments stimulate others • Unexpected insights • More complete info. • Elicit strong & common opinions • Less inhibiting, less formal. • Access needs of under-served or underrepresented groups.
Disadvantages • Lots of planning & administration time! Skilled moderator required • Participants may be too quiet or too outspoken • Analysis, summarization & interpretation of responses may be difficult • Tape transcription - time consuming & costly
Limitations • Difficult to generalize • May not be representative • Analyzes perceptions, not facts • Subjective analysis (reliability requires more than 1 person) • Compensate by combining methods (surveys/observation)
Phase I: Planning • Crucial phase! • Communicate to stakeholders • Determine role of FG in overall assessment • What info. is needed? • Identify key issues • Choose moderator & assistant (see handout)
More Planning • Identify target group(s) • Decide # of FG, 3-4 per targeted population • Identify pool • Recruit volunteers • Plan 8-12 per group (over-recruit & remind) • Offer reward (e.g., free copycard, food) • Seek representative members • Form homogeneous groups: • Academic (e.g., faculty, undergrads, grad. students) • Public (e.g., adults, teenagers, non-users)
Yet More Planning… • Design FG guide, include: • Introduction (purpose, ground rules) • Ice breaker or warm-up set of questions • Relevant major/probe questions (4-5) • Summary or closing • Consider modified FG (see handout) • Plan schedule (1.5-2.5 hours each) • When & Where • Choose notes or tape recorder • Choose method of data analysis
Phase II: Conducting Focus Groups • Bring/check supplies • Flip chart, markers, masking tape, etc. • If taping check equipment & have back-up • Start on time, don’t waste time • Begin by creating safe climate • Obtain permission to use info. & if taping • Help quiet people talk, limit talkative people • Thank them!
Phase III: Analysis • Listen/transcribe tapes • Review notes • Ways to analyze data: • Use data to identify categories • Repeated reading/listening • Code data into pre-determined categories • Use data as basis for summary statements “capture the essence” • Modified FG already identifies priorities
Analysis, Cont. • Compare across focus groups • Compile & summarize • Look for trends or problems to study • Do not overgeneralize from results!
Phase IV: Reporting Results • Parts of Report • Bulleted executive summary • Statement of purpose • List of issues • Method (keep it brief!) • How data collected • How analyzed • Describe participants
Parts of Report, Cont. • Summary of findings: • What said each issue • Consensus? • Comparison of groups • Sample quotes (anonymous) • Few, well chosen, representative • Interviewer’s impressions • Recommendations: • Short term (low hanging fruit) • Long term
Library Strategic Planning Examples • Academic • Rutgers University Libraries • Major part of strategic planning initiative. • Focus groups of students & faculty. • 3 Campuses. • 3 Moderators, 3 Assistants. • Recruitment difficulties. • Results extremely useful.
Brooklyn Public Visual & Performing Arts Library Inform building project. Large urban library system. FG of community groups, artists, art educators. Report used in informing decision making, fund raising, & strategic planning. Public Library Example
Presenting to Administrators • For written or oral presentation • Brevity is important • Put your best foot forward! Highlight: • Positive results • Strategic directions • Major concerns • Begin & end with quotation • Bulleted executive summary may be all that is read (!)
Using Results for Strategic Planning • Allow sufficient time to review results • Use missions, goals for guidance • Look at short & long term recommendations • Prioritize recommendations
Using Results Cont. • Gain consensus • Establish task forces or assign responsibilities • Establish objectives, target dates • Establish regular (6 mo. or annual) review process • Create assessment plan
For More Information… • See list of books & articles. • Questions?? • Thank you!