1 / 43

Applications of Number Theory

Applications of Number Theory. CS/APMA 202 Rosen section 2.6 Aaron Bloomfield. About this lecture set. We are only going to go over parts of section 2.6 Just the ones that deal directly with 2.6 Much of the underlying theory we will not be able to get to

pmassey
Télécharger la présentation

Applications of Number Theory

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Applications of Number Theory CS/APMA 202 Rosen section 2.6 Aaron Bloomfield

  2. About this lecture set • We are only going to go over parts of section 2.6 • Just the ones that deal directly with 2.6 • Much of the underlying theory we will not be able to get to • It’s beyond the scope of this course • Much of why this all works won’t be taught • It’s just an introduction to how it works

  3. Private key cryptography • The function and/or key to encrypt/decrypt is a secret • (Hopefully) only known to the sender and recipient • The same key encrypts and decrypts • How do you get the key to the recipient?

  4. Public key cryptography • Everybody has a key that encrypts and a separate key that decrypts • They are not interchangable! • The encryption key is made public • The decryption key is kept private

  5. Public key cryptography goals • Key generation should be relatively easy • Encryption should be easy • Decryption should be easy • With the right key! • Cracking should be very hard

  6. Is that number prime? • Use the Fermat primality test • Given: • n: the number to test for primality • k: the number of times to test (the certainty) • The algorithm is: repeat k times: pick a randomly in the range [1, n−1] if an−1 mod n ≠ 1 then return composite return probably prime

  7. Is that number prime? • The algorithm is: repeat k times: pick a randomly in the range [1, n−1] if an−1 mod n ≠ 1 then return composite return probably prime • Let n = 105 • Iteration 1: a = 92: 92104 mod 105 = 1 • Iteration 2: a = 84: 84104 mod 105 = 21 • Therefore, 105 is composite

  8. Is that number prime? • The algorithm is: repeat k times: pick a randomly in the range [1, n−1] if an−1 mod n ≠ 1 then return composite return probably prime • Let n = 101 • Iteration 1: a = 55: 55100 mod 100 = 1 • Iteration 2: a = 60: 60100 mod 100 = 1 • Iteration 3: a = 14: 14100 mod 100 = 1 • Iteration 4: a = 73: 73100 mod 100 = 1 • At this point, 101 has a (½)4 = 1/16 chance of still being composite

  9. More on the Fermat primality test • Each iteration halves the probability that the number is a composite • Probability = (½)k • If k = 100, probability it’s a composite is (½)100 = 1 in 1.2  1030 that the number is composite • Greater chance of having a hardware error! • Thus, k = 100 is a good value • However, this is not certain! • There are known numbers that are composite but will always report prime by this test • Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat_primality_test

  10. Google’s latest recruitment campaign

  11. RSA • Stands for the inventors: Ron Rivest, Adi Shamir and Len Adleman • Three parts: • Key generation • Encrypting a message • Decrypting a message

  12. Key generation steps • Choose two random large prime numbers p ≠ q, and n = p*q • Choose an integer 1 < e < n which is relatively prime to (p-1)(q-1) • Compute d such that d * e ≡ 1 (mod (p-1)(q-1)) • Rephrased: d*e mod (p-1)(q-1) = 1 • Destroy all records of p and q

  13. Key generation, step 1 • Choose two random large prime numbers p ≠ q • In reality, 2048 bit numbers are recommended • That’s  617 digits • From last lecture: chance of a random odd 2048 bit number being prime is about 1/710 • We can compute if a number is prime relatively quickly via the Fermat primality test • We choose p = 107 and q = 97 • Compute n = p*q • n = 10379

  14. Key generation, step 1 • Java code to find a big prime number: BigInteger prime = new BigInteger (numBits, certainty, random); The number of bits of the prime Certainty that the number is a prime The random number generator

  15. Key generation, step 1 • Java code to find a big prime number: import java.math.*; import java.util.*; class BigPrime { static int numDigits = 617; static int certainty = 100; static final double LOG_2 = Math.log(10)/Math.log(2); static int numBits = (int) (numDigits * LOG_2); public static void main (String args[]) { Random random = new Random(); BigInteger prime = new BigInteger (numBits, certainty, random); System.out.println (prime); } }

  16. Key generation, step 1 • How long does this take? • Keep in mind this is Java! • These tests done on a 850 Mhz Pentium machine • Average of 100 trials (certainty = 100) • 200 digits (664 bits): about 1.5 seconds • 617 digits (2048 bits): about 75 seconds

  17. Key generation, step 1 • Practical considerations • p and q should not be too close together • (p-1) and (q-1) should not have small prime factors • Use a good random number generator

  18. Key generation, step 2 • Choose an integer 1 < e < n which is relatively prime to (p-1)(q-1) • There are algorithms to do this efficiently • We aren’t going over them in this course • Easy way to do this: make e be a prime number • It only has to be relatively prime to (p-1)(q-1), but can be fully prime

  19. Key generation, step 2 • Recall that p = 107 and q = 97 • (p-1)(q-1) = 106*96 = 10176 = 26*3*53 • We choose e = 85 • 85 = 5*17 • gcd (85, 10176) = 1 • Thus, 85 and 10176 are relatively prime

  20. Key generation, step 3 • Compute d such that: d * e ≡ 1 (mod (p-1)(q-1)) • Rephrased: d*e mod (p-1)(q-1) = 1 • There are algorithms to do this efficiently • We aren’t going over them in this course • We choose d = 4669 • 4669*85 mod 10176 = 1 • Use the script at http://www.cs.virginia.edu/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/asb/modpow

  21. Key generation, step 3 • Java code to find d: import java.math.*; class FindD { public static void main (String args[]) { BigInteger pq = new BigInteger("10176"); BigInteger e = new BigInteger ("85"); System.out.println (e.modInverse(pq)); } } • Result: 4669

  22. Key generation, step 4 • Destroy all records of p and q • If we know p and q, then we can compute the private encryption key from the public decryption key d * e ≡ 1 (mod (p-1)(q-1))

  23. The keys • We have n = p*q = 10379, e = 85, and d = 4669 • The public key is (n,e) = (10379, 85) • The private key is (n,d) = (10379, 4669) • Thus, n is not private • Only d is private • In reality, d and e are 600 (or so) digit numbers • Thus n is a 1200 (or so) digit number

  24. Encrypting messages • To encode a message: • Encode the message m into a number • Split the number into smaller numbers m < n • Use the formula c = memod n • c is the ciphertext, and m is the message • Java code to do the last step: • m.modPow (e, n) • Where the object m is the BigInteger to encrypt

  25. Encrypting messages example • Encode the message into a number • String is “Go Cavaliers!!” • Modified ASCII codes: • 41 81 02 37 67 88 67 78 75 71 84 85 03 03 • Split the number into numbers < n • 4181 0237 6788 6778 7571 8485 0303 • Use the formula c = me mod n • 418185 mod 10379 = 4501 • 023785 mod 10379 = 2867 • 678885 mod 10379 = 4894 • Etc… • Encrypted message: • 4501 2867 4894 0361 3630 4496 6720

  26. Encrypting RSA messages • Formula is c = memod n

  27. Decrypting messages • Use the formula m = cdmod n on each number • Split the number into individual ASCII character numbers • Decode the message into a string

  28. Decrypting messages example • Encrypted message: • 4501 2867 4894 0361 3630 4496 6720 • Use the formula m = cdmod n on each number • 45014669 mod 10379 = 4181 • 28674669 mod 10379 = 0237 • 48944669 mod 10379 = 6788 • Etc… • Split the numbers into individual characters • 41 81 02 37 67 88 67 78 75 71 84 85 03 03 • Decode the message into a string • Modified ASCII codes: • 41 81 02 37 67 88 67 78 75 71 84 85 03 03 • Retrieved String is “Go Cavaliers!!”

  29. modPow computation • How to compute c = memod n or m = cdmod n? • Example: 45014669 mod 10379 = 4181 • Use the script at http://www.cs.virginia.edu/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/asb/modpow • Other means: • Java: use the BigInteger.modPow() method • Perl: use the bmodpow function in the BigInt library • Etc…

  30. Why this works • m = cdmod n • c = memod n • cd ≡ (me)d ≡ med (mod n) • Recall that: • ed ≡ 1 (mod p-1) • ed ≡ 1 (mod q-1) • Thus, • med ≡ m (mod p) • med ≡ m (mod q) • med ≡ m (mod pq) • med ≡ m (mod n)

  31. Cracking a message • In order to decrypt a message, we must compute m = cdmod n • n is known (part of the public key) • c is known (the ciphertext) • e is known (the encryption key) • Thus, we must compute d with no other information • Recall: choose an integer 1 < e < n which is relatively prime to (p-1)(q-1) • Recall: Compute d such that d * e ≡ 1 (mod (p-1)(q-1)) • Thus, we must factor the composite n into it’s component primes • There is no efficient way to do this! • We can tell that n is composite very easily, but we can’t tell what its factors are • Once n is factored into p and q, we compute d as above • Then we can decrypt c to obtain m

  32. Cracking a message example • In order to decrypt a message, we must compute m = cd mod n • n = 10379 • c is the ciphertext being cracked • e = 85 • In order to determine d, we need to factor n • d * e ≡ 1 (mod (p-1)(q-1)) • We factor n into p and q: 97 and 107 • d * 85 ≡ 1 (mod (96)(106)) • This would not have been feasible with two large prime factors!!! • We then compute d as above, and crack the message

  33. Signing a message • Recall that we computed d*e mod (p-1)(q-1) = 1 • Note that d and e are interchangable! • You can use either for the encryption key • You can encrypt with either key! • Thus, you must use the other key to decrypt

  34. Signing a message • To “sign” a message: • Write a message, and determine the MD5 hash • Encrypt the hash with your private (encryption) key • Anybody can verify that you created the message because ONLY the public (encryption) key can decrypt the hash • The hash is then verified against the message

  35. PGP and GnuPG • Two applications which implement the RSA algorithm • GnuPG Is open-source (thus it’s free) • PGP was first, and written by Phil Zimmerman • The US gov’t didn’t like PGP…

  36. The US gov’t and war munitions

  37. How to “crack” PGP • Factoring n is not feasible • Thus, “cracking” PGP is done by other means • Intercepting the private key • “Hacking” into the computer, stealing the computer, etc. • Man-in-the-middle attack • Etc.

  38. Other public key encryption methods • Modular logarithms • Developed by the US government, therefore not widely trusted • Elliptic curves

  39. Quantum computers • A quantum computer could (in principle) factor n in reasonable time • This would make RSA obsolete! • Shown (in principle) by Peter Shor in 1993 • You would need a new (quantum) encryption algorithm to encrypt your messages • This is like saying, “in principle, you could program a computer to correctly predict the weather” • IBM recently created a quantum computer that successfully factored 15 into 3 and 5 • I bet the NSA is working on such a computer, also

  40. Sources • Wikipedia article has a lot of info on RSA and the related algorithms • Those articles use different variable names • Link at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA

  41. Quick survey • I felt I understood the material in this slide set… • Very well • With some review, I’ll be good • Not really • Not at all

  42. Quick survey • The pace of the lecture for this slide set was… • Fast • About right • A little slow • Too slow

  43. Quick survey • How interesting was the material in this slide set? Be honest! • Wow! That was SOOOOOO cool! • Somewhat interesting • Rather borting • Zzzzzzzzzzz

More Related