1 / 17

Underwriting Risk Ex-Post Analysis

Underwriting Risk Ex-Post Analysis. Richard A. Derrig OPAL Consulting LLC Temple University 2009 CAS Spring Meeting New Orleans, LA May 3-6. The Actuary’s Ex-Post Problem. Did the Premium Charged Cover the Costs Incurred?

polstonc
Télécharger la présentation

Underwriting Risk Ex-Post Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Underwriting RiskEx-Post Analysis Richard A. Derrig OPAL Consulting LLC Temple University 2009 CAS Spring Meeting New Orleans, LA May 3-6

  2. The Actuary’s Ex-Post Problem • Did the Premium Charged Cover the Costs Incurred? • If Not, Why Not?

  3. The Best Laid Plans: Indicated Pricing • TARGET BOOK: Bigger, Smaller, Same,Timing • TARGET BLOCKS: Sub-Books, Credibility • LOSSES: Data-Based, Model, Cats, DCCE • EXPENSES: Acquisition Distribution, General • EXTRAS: Reinsurance, Assessments • PROFIT: Fixed, Model, By Line, Cash Flows, Capital, COC, Invested Assets, Taxes, Expense

  4. The Best Laid Plans: Actual Pricing • TARGET BOOK: Bigger, Smaller, Same,Timing • TARGET BLOCKS: Sub-Books, Credibility • LOSSES: Data-Based, Model, Cats, DCCE • EXPENSES: Acquisition Distribution, General • EXTRAS: Reinsurance, Assessments • PROFIT: Fixed, Model, By Line, Cash Flows, Capital, COC, Invested Assets, Taxes, Expense • DIFFERENCES: Known,Unknown,Whole/Partial

  5. Differences: Random or Systematic • TARGET BOOK: Bigger, Smaller, Same,Timing • TARGET BLOCKS: Sub-Books, Credibility • LOSSES: Data-Based, Model, Cats, DCCE • EXPENSES: Acquisition Distribution, General • EXTRAS: Reinsurance, Assessments • PROFIT: Fixed, Model, By Line, Cash Flows, Capital, COC, Invested Assets, Taxes, Expense • DIFFERENCES: Known,Unknown,Whole/Partial

  6. Actuarial v Financial View of Pricing Actuarial View: Price Dynamics in Insurance Markets Risk = Volatility of Losses Managed for Risk, e.g. Reinsurance Policy and Accident Year Perspective Financial View: Price Dynamics in Asset Markets Risk = Volatility of Returns Managed for Risk, Capital Allocation Calendar Year Perspective

  7. A Short History of Actuarial Pricing • 1. Budget period – Supply side provision of +5% (+2.5 for WC) • 2. Investment offset –Calendar year acct (ISO ,Biger-Kahane) • 3. CAPM return: Returns offset w income at risk-free (Fairley, Hill) • 4. Include taxes, (Myers-Cohn), 2 tax rates (Hill-Modigliani) • 5. Perspective: Policyholder, Shareholder (NCCI, Cummins, Taylor) • 6. PV taxes independent of risk, (Myers, Derrig) • 7. Insurance is an option (Krauss-Ross, Doherty-Garven, Derrig) • 8. Insolvency putin prices (Butsic, Cummins-Allen-Phillips) • 9. Allocate capital(costs): • Insolvency put equal at the margin (Myers-Read); • Capital and risk management, catastrophes, (Zanjani); • Testing prices for frictional costs, (Cummins-Phillips-Lin)

  8. A Short History of Pricing - Comments • 1. Budget period – Supply side provision of +5% (Company) • 2. Investment Offset- Calendar year pricing (Company) • 2. CAPM return: Returns offset w risk-free income (Equilibrium) • 3. Include taxes, Myers-Cohn (Policyholder) • 4. Perspective: Policyholder, Shareholder (Equilibrium) • 5. PV taxes independent of risk, (Myers Theorem) • 6. Insurance is an option (Price is exchange option value) • 7. Insolvency putin prices (Price is less than fully guaranteed price) • 8. Allocate capital(Costs): • Insolvency put equal at the margin (Equilibrium); • Capital and risk management, catastrophes, (Frictional costs); • Testing prices for frictional costs (Taxes, RM, Capital)

  9. Liabilities-Surplus-Profit

  10. Richard Derrig Top Ten Issues 2007“The future issues will be much like the past issues” 1. COST OF CAPITAL (DCF, CAPM, BY-LINE) 2. ROLE OF DEBT IN THE CAPITAL STRUCTURE (BONDED) 3. ROLE OF REINSURANCE IN PRICING THE PRIMARY PRODUCT (CAPITAL) 4. MARKET ESTIMATES APPLIED TO BOOK VALUES (CAPM x SURPLUS) 5. FRICTIONAL COSTS OF HOLDING CAPITAL (TAXES, INSOLVENCY) 6. INTEREST RATES AND ASSET RETURNS (INVESTMENT INCOME) 7. LOADING FOR RISK (RISK ADJUSTMENT, RISK PREMIUM) 8. CATASTROPHES (TERRORISM, NATURAL DISASTERS) 9. ACCOUNTING (FAIR VALUE, ANY VALUE, ACC.YEAR)10. FIRM SIZE (HIGHER RETURNS)

  11. Going Forward  • Specification and quantification of “frictions” = non-systematic risk management and capital charges. • Actuarial and finance converging still, adopt the central “liquidity” variable? • Pricing regulation (when it exists) is stuck in the ’70s. • Integration of Allocation and ERM

  12. REFERENCES • Automobile Insurers Bureau of Massachusetts, 2008 Advisory Filing for Under 1% Companies, • Biger, Nahum and Yehuda Kahane 1978. Risk Considerations in Insurance Ratemaking, Journal of Risk and Insurance, 45:1, 121-132. • Butsic, R.P., 1999. Capital Allocation for Property-Liability Insurers: A Catastrophe Reinsurance Application, Casualty Actuarial Society Forum, Spring, 1-70. • Cummns, D., Derrig R. and R. Phillips, 2007. A Report on the CAS COTOR Risk Premium Project, Risk Management Newsletter. • Cummins, D., Harrington, S., 1987. Fair Rate of Return in Property-Liability Insurance. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston. • Cummins, D., Phillips R., 2005. Estimating the Cost of Equity Capital For Property-Liability Insurers, Journal of Risk and Insurance, 72, 3, 441-478. • Cummins, D., Phillips, R., 2006. Effects of Capital Allocation on Pricing in Property-Liability Insurance: An Investigation into the Pricing of Intermediated Risks, Working Paper. • D’arcy, Stephen P. and Michael Dyer, 1997. Ratemaking: A Financial Economics Approach, Proceedings of the Casualty Actuarial Society, Vol. 84, 301-390. • Derrig, R., 1994. Theoretical Considerations of the Effect of Federal Income Taxes on the Investment Income in Property-Liability Ratemaking,Journal of Risk and Insurance, 61, 691-706. • Derrig, R., Orr, E., 2004. Equity Risk Premium: Equity Risk Premium: Expectations Great and Small, North American Actuarial Journal, 8, 45-69. • Derrig, R., 1989. Solvency Levels and Risk Loadings Appropriate for Fully Guaranteed Property-Liability Insurance Contracts: A Financial View, Financial Models of Insurance Solvency, Cummins, D., and Derrig, R., (Eds), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston. • Doherty, N., Garven, J., 1986. Price Regulation in Property-Liability Insurance; a Contingent Claims Approach. Journal of Finance, 41, 1031-1050.

  13. REFERENCES • Fairley, W., 1979. Investment income and profit margins in property-liability insurance: theory and empirical results. Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 192-210. • Froot, Kenneth A., 2007. Risk Management, Capital Budgeting and Capital Structure Policy for Insurers and Reinsurers, Journal of Risk and Insurance. • Goyal, A., Welch, I., 2005. A Comprehensive Look at the Empirical Performance of Equity Premium Prediction, Yale ICF Working Paper No. 04-11. • Hill, Raymond D., 1979. Profit Regulation in Property-Liability Insurance, Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 10, 172-191. • Hill, R., Modigliani, F., 1987. The Massachusetts model regulation in nonlife insurance: an appraisal and extensions. In: Cummins, D., Harrington. S. (Eds.), Fair Rate of Return in Property-Liability Insurance. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston. • Kahley, William J. and Halliwell, Leigh J.,1992. The NCCI Internal Rate of Return and Cost of Capital Models, NCCI Digest, 7:4, p.37. • Karl, K., Laster, D., 2004. The U.S. Equity Risk Premium: Framing Reasonable Expectations, Insights, Swiss Re, Zurich. • Kozik, Thomas J., and Aaron M. Larson, 2001. The n-Moment Insurance CAPM, Proceedings of the Casualty Actuarial Society, LXXXVII, 168-169 (May). • Kozik, Thomas J., 1994. Underwriting Betas - The Shadows of Ghosts, Proceedings of the Casualty Actuarial Society, LXXXI, 303-329. • Kraus, A., Ross, S., 1982. The Determination of Fair Profits for the Property-Liability Insurance Firm, Journal of Finance, 37, 1015-1028. • Merton, R., Perold, A., 1993. Theory of Risk Capital in Financial Firms. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 6, 16-32. • Myers, S., Cohn, R., 1987. A discounted cash flow approach to property-liability insurance rate regulation. In: Cummins, D., Harrington, S. (eds.), Fair Rate of Return in Property-Liability Insurance. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.

More Related