1 / 75

Evidence-based postpartum care

Evidence-based postpartum care. A review of the cochrane database on postpartum care Joseph Breuner, MD 2/25/03. 29 cochrane reviews organized in the following categories. 1. Antibiotic choices 2. Postpartum hemorrhage/retained placenta 3. Perineal pain 4. Contraception 5. Breast feeding

prema
Télécharger la présentation

Evidence-based postpartum care

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Evidence-based postpartum care A review of the cochrane database on postpartum care Joseph Breuner, MD 2/25/03

  2. 29 cochrane reviews organized in the following categories • 1. Antibiotic choices • 2. Postpartum hemorrhage/retained placenta • 3. Perineal pain • 4. Contraception • 5. Breast feeding • 6. Epidural headache

  3. Categories (cont) • 7. Smoking • 8. Incontinence • 9. Postpartum depression • 10. Early discharge • 11. Prevention of thromboembolic disease • 12. Umbilical cord care • 13. Would you actually tell your patients to have sex ?

  4. Take home points • rectal misoprostol shows promise to treat PPH • immediate p partum IUD shows promise, needs more study • breast feeding support is effective • pelvic floor exercises treat but don’t prevent stress incontinence • No strategies to prevent thromboembolic disease are effective

  5. 1. Antibiotic use and choices

  6. Antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean section • Reviewers' conclusions: The reduction of endometritis by two thirds to three quarters and a decrease in wound infections justifies a policy of recommending prophylactic antibiotics to women undergoing elective or non-elective cesarean section.

  7. Main results: Eighty-one trials were included. Use of prophylactic antibiotics in women undergoing cesarean section substantially reduced the incidence of episodes of fever, endometritis, wound infection, urinary tract infection and serious infection after cesarean section. The reduction in the risk of endometritis with antibiotics was similar across different patient groups: the relative risk (RR) for endometritis for elective cesarean section (number of women = 2037) was 0.38 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.22 to 0.64); the RR for non-elective cesarean section (n = 2132) was 0.39 (95% CI 0.34 to 0.46); and the RR for all patients (n = 11,937) was 0.39 (95% CI 0.31 to 0.43). Wound infections were also reduced: for elective cesarean section (n = 2015) RR 0.73 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.99); for non-elective cesarean section (n = 2780) RR 0.36 95% CI 0.26 to 0.51]; and for all patients (n = 11,142) RR 0.41 (95% CI 0.29 to 0.43).

  8. Antibiotic regimens for endometritis after delivery • Reviewers' conclusions: The combination of gentamicin and clindamycin is appropriate for the treatment of endometritis. Regimens with activity against penicillin resistant anaerobic bacteria are better than those without. There is no evidence that any one regimen is associated with fewer side effects. Once uncomplicated endometritis has clinically improved with intravenous therapy, oral therapy is not needed.

  9. Main results: Forty-seven trials were included. Overall the studies were methodologically poor. In the intent-to-treat analysis, fifteen studies comparing clindamycin and an aminoglycoside with another regimen showed more treatment failures with another regimen (relative risk (RR) 1.32; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09-1.60). Failures of those regimens with poor activity against penicillin resistant anaerobic bacteria were more likely (RR 1.53; 95% CI 1.10-2.13). In four studies that compared continued oral antibiotic therapy after intravenous therapy, no differences were found in recurrent endometritis or other outcomes. There was no evidence of difference in incidence of allergic reactions. Cephalosporins were associated with less diarrhea.

  10. 2. Postpartum hemorrhage/retained placenta

  11. Prophylactic use of oxytocin in the third stage of labour • Reviewers' conclusions: There are strong suggestions of benefit for oxytocin in terms of postpartum haemorrhage, and the need for therapeutic oxytocics, but without sufficient information about other outcomes and side-effects it is difficult to be confident about the trade-offs for these benefits, especially if the risk of manual removal of the placenta may be increased. There seems little evidence in favour of ergot alkaloids alone compared to either oxytocin alone, or to Syntometrine, but the data are sparse. More trials are needed in domiciliary deliveries in developing countries, which shoulder most of the burden of third stage complications.

  12. Main results: In seven trials involving over 3000 women in hospital and/or developed country settings, prophylactic oxytocin showed benefits (reduced blood loss (relative risk (RR) for blood loss > 500 ml 0.50; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43, 0.59) and need for therapeutic oxytocics (RR 0.50; 95% CI 0.39, 0.64).) compared to no uterotonics, although there was a non-significant trend towards more manual removal of the placenta (RR 1.17; 95% CI 0.79, 1.73) which was most marked in the expectant management subgroup, and blood transfusions (RR 1.30; 95% CI 0.50, 3.39) in the trials with more manual removals of the placenta). In six trials involving over 2800 women, there was little evidence of differential effects for oxytocin versus ergot alkaloids, except ergot alkaloids are associated with more manual removals of the placenta (RR 0.57; 95% CI 0.41, 0.79), and with the suggestion of more raised blood pressure (RR 0.53; 95% CI 0.19, 1.58) than with oxytocin. In five trials involving over 2800 women, there was little evidence of a synergistic effects of adding oxytocin to ergometrine versus ergometrine alone. For all other outcomes in the comparisons either there are no data or the number of adverse events is very small, and so definite conclusions cannot be drawn.

  13. Prostaglandins for prevention of postpartum haemorrhage • Reviewers' conclusions: Neither intramuscular prostaglandins nor misoprostol are preferable to conventional injectable uterotonics as part of the active management of the third stage of labour especially for low-risk women. Future research on prostaglandin use after birth should focus on the treatment of postpartum haemorrhage rather than prevention where they seem to be more promising.

  14. Main results: Seventeen misoprostol and eight intramuscular prostaglandin trials were included. The data comparing oral misoprostol to no uterotonics/placebo are from three trials involving 1700 women and are difficult to interpret because of the heterogeneity between trials. However, the data do not suggest a substantive reduction in the rate of postpartum haemorrhage or other measures of blood loss so far. Oral misoprostol 600 mcg showed clinically and statistically significantly more blood loss >= 1000 mls compared with conventional injectable uterotonics (all trials, 21099 women; relative risk (RR): 1.36, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.17 to 1.58). Shivering and elevated body temperature ( > 38 degrees C) are the main side-effects of misoprostol and are dose related. Compared to oxytocin the RR of any shivering with 600 mcg oral misoprostol is 3.27 (95% CI: 3.01 to 3.56) and temperature > 38C is 6.96 (95% CI: 5.95 to 8.57). Injectable prostaglandins are associated with reduced blood loss in the third stage of labour (weighted mean difference: -70 mls, 95% CI: -73 to -67 mls) when compared to conventional injectable uterotonics but have more side-effects.

  15. Umbilical vein injection for management of retained placenta • Reviewers' conclusions: Umbilical vein injection of saline solution plus oxytocin appears to be effective in the management of retained placenta. Saline solution alone does not appear be more effective than expectant management. Further research into umbilical vein injection of oxytocin, prostaglandins or plasma expander is warranted.

  16. Main results: Twelve trials were included. The trials were of variable quality. Compared with expectant management, umbilical vein injection of saline solution alone did not show any significant difference in the incidence of manual removal of the placenta (relative risk (RR): 0.97; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83 to 1.14). Umbilical vein injection of saline solution plus oxytocin compared with expectant management showed a reduction in manual removal, although this was not statistically significant (RR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.72 to 1.01). Saline solution with oxytocin compared with saline solution alone showed a significant reduction in manual removal of the placenta (RR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.69 to 0.91) (number needed to treat: 8; 95% CI: 5 to 20). No discernible difference was detected in length of third stage of labour, blood loss, haemorrhage, haemoglobin, blood transfusion, curettage, infection, hospital stay, fever, abdominal pain and oxytocin augmentation. Umbilical vein injection of saline solution plus oxytocin compared with umbilical vein injection of plasma expander showed higher, but not statistically significant, incidence of manual removal of placenta (RR: 1.34; 95% CI: 0.97 to 1.85) and no difference in blood loss but there is only one small trial contributing to this comparison. Saline solution plus prostaglandin, compared with saline solution alone, was associated with a statistically significant lower incidence in manual removal of placenta (RR: 0.05; 95% CI: 0.00 to 0.73 ) but no difference was observed in blood loss, fever, abdominal pain, and oxytocin augmentation but there is only one small trial contributing to these results. There were no significant differences between saline solution plus prostaglandin and saline solution plus oxytocin (RR: 0.10; 95% CI: 0.01 to 1.59) but again there is only one small trial contributing to this meta-analysis.

  17. Treatment for primary postpartum haemorrhage • Reviewers' conclusions: Rectal misoprostol in a dose of 800 micrograms could be a useful 'first line' drug for the treatment of primary postpartum haemorrhage. Further randomised controlled trials are required to identify the best drug combinations, route, and dose for the treatment of postpartum haemorrhage.

  18. Main results: One trial, comparing rectally administered misoprostol versus syntometrine combined with an oxytocin infusion, met the eligibility criteria and was included in the review. It was not large enough to evaluate the effects of rectal misoprostol on maternal mortality, serious maternal morbidity or hysterectomy rates in women with primary postpartum haemorrhage. Compared with a combination of intramuscular syntometrine injection and oxytocin infusion, rectal misoprostol administration showed a statistically significant reduction in the number of women who continued to bleed after the intervention and those who required medical co-interventions to control the bleeding (6% versus 34%) (relative risk 0.18, 95% confidence interval 0.04 to 0.67). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding surgical interventions to control intractable haemorrhage including hysterectomy, internal iliac artery ligation and/or uterine packing.

  19. Treatments for secondary postpartum haemorrhage • Reviewers' conclusions: No information is available from randomised controlled trials to inform the management of women with secondary postpartum haemorrhage. This topic may have received little attention because it is perceived as being associated with maternal morbidity rather than mortality in developed countries; it is only recently that the extent and importance of postnatal maternal morbidity has been recognised. A well designed randomised controlled trial comparing the various drug therapies for women with secondary postpartum haemorrhage against each other and against placebo or no treatment groups is needed.

  20. Main results: Of the 45 papers identified, none met the inclusion criteria

  21. 3. Perineal pain

  22. Absorbable synthetic versus catgut suture material for perineal repair • Reviewers' conclusions: Absorbable synthetic suture material (in the form of polyglycolic acid and polyglactin sutures) for perineal repair following childbirth appears to decrease women's experience of short-term pain. The length of time taken for the synthetic material to be absorbed is of concern. A trial addressing the use of polyglactin has recently been completed and this has been included in this updated review.

  23. Main results: Eight trials were included. Compared with catgut, the polyglycolic acid and polyglactin groups were associated with less pain in first three days (odds ratio 0.62, 95% confidence interval 0.54 to 0.71). There was also less need for analgesia (odds ratio 0.63, 95% confidence interval 0.52 to 0.77) and less suture dehiscence (odds ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.29 to 0.70). There was no significant difference in long term pain (odds ratio 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.61 to 1.08). Removal of suture material was significantly more common in the polyglycolic acid and polyglactin groups (odds ratio 2.01, 95% confidence interval 1.56 to 2.58). There was no difference in the amount of dyspareunia experienced by women.

  24. Continuous versus interrupted sutures for perineal repair • Reviewers' conclusions: The continuous subcuticular technique of perineal repair may be associated with less pain in the immediate postpartum period than the interrupted suture technique. The long-term effects are less clear.

  25. Main results: Four studies involving 1864 women were included. The trials were heterogeneous with respect to operator skill and training. Compared with interrupted sutures, a continuous subcuticular suture technique of perineal repair was associated with less pain for up to 10 days post partum (odds ratio 0.68, 95% confidence interval 0.53 to 0.86). No differences were seen in the need for analgesia, need for resuturing of the wound or in dyspareunia. Based on one trial only, there was no difference in long-term pain and failure to resume pain-free intercourse within three months of the birth. The continuous technique was associated with less need for the removal of sutures.

  26. Episiotomy for vaginal birth • Reviewers' conclusions: Restrictive episiotomy policies appear to have a number of benefits compared to routine episiotomy policies. There is less posterior perineal trauma, less suturing and fewer complications, no difference for most pain measures and severe vaginal or perineal trauma, but there was an increased risk of anterior perineal trauma with restrictive episiotomy.

  27. Main results: Six studies were included. In the routine episiotomy group, 72.7% (1752/2409) of women had episiotomies, while the rate in the restrictive episiotomy group was 27.6% (673/2441). Compared with routine use, restrictive episiotomy involved less posterior perineal trauma (relative risk 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.84 to 0.92), less suturing (relative risk 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.71 to 0.77) and fewer healing complications (relative risk 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.56 to 0.85). Restrictive episiotomy was associated with more anterior perineal trauma (relative risk 1.79, 95% 1.55 to 2.07). There was no difference in severe vaginal or perineal trauma (relative risk 1.11, 95% confidence interval 0.83 to 1.50); dyspareunia (relative risk 1.02, 95% confidence interval 0.90 to 1.16); urinary incontinence (relative risk 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.79 to 1.20) or several pain measures. Results for restrictive versus routine mediolateral versus midline episiotomy were similar to the overall comparison.

  28. Therapeutic ultrasound for postpartum perineal pain and dyspareunia • Reviewers' conclusions: There is not enough evidence to evaluate the use of ultrasound in treating perineal pain and/or dyspareunia following childbirth.

  29. Main results: Four trials involving 659 women were included. The trials were of variable quality. Based on two placebo controlled trials, women treated with active ultrasound for acute perineal pain were more likely to report improvement in pain with treatment (odds ratio 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.19 to 0.69). No other outcome reached significance. In one trial comparing pulsed electromagnetic energy with ultrasound for acute perineal pain, women treated with ultrasound were more likely to have bruising at 10 days (odds ratio 1.64, 95% confidence interval 1.04 to 2.60). However those treated with ultrasound were less likely to have experienced perineal pain at 10 days (odds ratio 0.56, 95% confidence interval 0.34 to 0.92) and three months (odds ratio 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.22 to 0.84). No other outcome reached significance. Based on one trial, women treated with ultrasound for persistent perineal pain and/or dyspareunia were less likely to report pain with sexual intercourse compared with the placebo group (odds ratio 0.31, 95% confidence interval 0.11 to 0.84). None of the other outcomes measured reached significance.

  30. 4. contraception

  31. Education for contraceptive use by women after childbirth • Reviewers' conclusions: The effectiveness of postpartum education about contraceptive use has not yet been established in randomised controlled trials. Such education may be effective in increasing the short-term use of contraception. However, there are only limited data examining a more-important longer-term effect on the prevention of unplanned pregnancies. Research needs to be undertaken to assess the effectiveness of the minimalist education provided in more developed countries and the variety of programs provided in less developed regions. Such research should examine the content, timing, range and organisation of postpartum education on contraceptive use including lactational amenorrhea, as well as its impact on breast feeding rates.

  32. Main results: No new trials were identified since this review was updated in 1999. Three trials were identified with 5438 women. These trials were conducted in Lebanon, Peru and Nepal. None of the trials examined all major prespecified endpoints. Postpartum education about contraceptive use influenced short-term use assessed between 40 days and three months post-partum. Women in the intervention groups were less likely to be non-users than women in the comparison groups (Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.47, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.39 to 0.58). This benefit was not apparent following analysis of data from better quality studies (OR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.13). An apparent benefit on contraceptive use at six months post-partum (OR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.74) was not apparent following sensitivity analyses (OR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.06). Data are inadequate to assess the impact on cessation of breast feeding and non-attendance at family planning clinics. Unplanned pregnancies, knowledge about contraception and satisfaction with care were not assessed in any trial.

  33. Immediate post-partum insertion of intrauterine devices • Reviewers' conclusions: Immediate post-partum insertion of IUDs appeared safe and effective, though direct comparisons with other insertion times were lacking. Advantages of immediate post-partum insertion include high motivation, assurance that the woman is not pregnant, and convenience. However, expulsion rates appear to be higher than with interval insertion. The popularity of immediate post-partum IUD insertion in countries as diverse as China, Mexico, and Egypt support the feasibility of this approach. Early follow-up may be important in identifying spontaneous IUD expulsions.

  34. Main results: We found no randomized controlled trials that directly compared immediate post-partum insertion with either delayed post-partum or interval insertion. Modifications of existing devices, such as adding absorbable sutures or additional appendages, did not appear beneficial. Most studies showed no important differences between insertions done by hand or by instruments. Lippes Loops and Progestasert devices did not perform as well as did copper devices.

  35. Minilaparotomy and endoscopic techniques for tubal sterilisation • Reviewers' conclusions: Major morbidity seems to be a rare outcome for both, laparoscopy and minilaparotomy. The included studies had limited power to demonstrate significant differences especially for the relatively rare but potentially serious outcomes. Personal preference of the woman and/or of the surgeon can guide the choice of technique. Practical aspects (e.g. cost, maintenance, and sterilisation of the instruments) must be taken into account before implementing the more sophisticated endoscopic techniques in settings with limited resources. Culdoscopy is not recommended as it carries a higher complication rate.

  36. Main results: Minilaparotomy vs laparoscopy: There was no difference in major morbidity between the 2 groups. Minor morbidity was significantly less in the laparoscopy group (Peto OR 1.89; 95% CI 1.38, 2.59). Duration of operation was about 5 minutes shorter in the laparoscopy group (WMD 5.34; 95% CI 4.52, 6.16).Minilaparotomy vs culdoscopy: Women undergoing culdoscopy had more major morbidity than women for whom minilaparotomy was performed (Peto OR 0.14; 95% CI 0.02, 0.98). Duration of operation was about 5 minutes shorter in women undergoing culdoscopy (WMD 4.91; 95% CI 3.82, 6.01).Laparoscopy vs culdoscopy: In the one trial comparing the two interventions there were no significant differences between the groups with regard to major morbidity. Significantly more women suffered from minor morbidities in the culdoscopy group compared to the laparoscopy group (Peto OR 0.20; 95% CI 0.05, 0.77).

  37. 5. Breastfeeding

  38. Support for breastfeeding mothers • Reviewers' conclusions: Consideration should be given to providing supplementary breastfeeding support as part of routine health service provision. There is clear evidence for the effectiveness of professional support on the duration of any breastfeeding although the strength of its effect on the rate of exclusive breastfeeding is uncertain. Lay support is effective in promoting exclusive breastfeeding while the strength of its effect on the duration of any breastfeeding is also uncertain. Evidence supports the promotion of exclusive breastfeeding as central to the management of diarrhoeal illness in partially breastfed infants. • Further trials are required to assess the effectiveness (including cost-effectiveness) of both lay and professional support in different settings - in particular in those communities with low rates of breastfeeding initiation. Research is also required into the most appropriate training for those, whether lay or professional, who support breastfeeding mothers.

  39. Main results: Twenty eligible randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials from 10 countries were identified involving 23,712 mother-infant pairs. There was a beneficial effect on the duration of any breastfeeding in the meta-analysis of all forms of extra support (relative risk (RR) for stopping any breastfeeding before six months 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81,0.95]; 15 trials, 21,910 women). The effect was greater for exclusive breastfeeding (RR 0.78 [95% CI 0.69,0.89]; 11 trials, 20,788 women). Extra professional support appeared beneficial for any breastfeeding (RR 0.89 [95% CI 0.81,0.97]; 10 trials, 19,696 women) and for exclusive breastfeeding (RR 0.90 [95% confidence interval 0.81,1.01]; six trials, 18,258 women) although the latter effect did not achieve full statistical significance. Lay support was effective in reducing the cessation of exclusive breastfeeding (RR 0.66 [95% CI 0.49,0.89]; five trials, 2530 women) but its effect on any breastfeeding did not reach statistical significance (RR 0.84 [95% CI 0.69,1.02]; five trials, 2224 women). Professional support in the largest trial to assess health outcomes produced a significant reduction in the risk of gastro-intestinal infections and atopic eczema. In two trials with children suffering from diarrhoeal illness extra support was highly effective in increasing short term exclusive breastfeeding rates and reducing recurrence of diarrhoea.

  40. Commercial hospital discharge packs for breastfeeding women • Reviewers' conclusions: The giving of commercial hospital discharge packs (with or without formula) appears to reduce the number of women exclusively breastfeeding at all times but has no significant effect upon the earlier termination of non-exclusive breastfeeding.

  41. Main results: Nine randomised controlled trials involving a total of 3730 women were analysed. The studies only included women from North America. The meta-analysis showed that when comparing commercial discharge packs with any of the controls (no intervention, non-commercial pack and combinations of these), exclusive breastfeeding was reduced at all time points in the presence of commercial hospital discharge packs. There was no evidence to support the conjecture that use of hospital discharge packs causes the early termination of non-exclusive breastfeeding. Where the introduction of solid food was measured, giving a commercial pack (with or without formula) reduced the time before solid food was introduced.

  42. Treatments for breast engorgement during lactation • Reviewers' conclusions: Cabbage leaves and gel packs were equally effective in the treatment of engorgement. Since both cabbage extract and placebo cream were equally effective, the alleviation in symptoms may be brought about by other factors, such as breast massage. Ultrasound treatment is equally effective with or without the ultra-wave emitting crystal, therefore its effectiveness is more likely to be due to the effect of radiant heat or massage. Pharmacologically, oxytocin was not an effective engorgement treatment while Danzen and bromelain/trypsin complex significantly improved the symptoms of engorgement. Initial prevention of breast engorgement should remain the key priority.

  43. Main results: Eight trials, involving 424 women, were included. Three different studies were identified which used cabbage leaves or cabbage leaf extracts;. no overall benefit was found. Ultrasound treatment and placebo were equally effective. Use of Danzen (an anti-inflammatory agent) significantly improved the total symptoms of engorgement when compared to placebo (odds ratio (OR) 3.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3 - 10.3) as did bromelain/trypsin complex (OR 8.02, 95% CI 2.8-23.3). Oxytocin and cold packs had no demonstrable effect on engorgement symptoms.

  44. Optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding • Reviewers' conclusions: We found no objective evidence of a 'weanling's dilemma'. Infants who are exclusively breastfed for six months experience less morbidity from gastrointestinal infection than those who are mixed breastfed as of three or four months, and no deficits have been demonstrated in growth among infants from either developing or developed countries who are exclusively breastfed for six months or longer. Moreover, the mothers of such infants have more prolonged lactational amenorrhea. Although infants should still be managed individually so that insufficient growth or other adverse outcomes are not ignored and appropriate interventions are provided, the available evidence demonstrates no apparent risks in recommending, as a general policy, exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life in both developing and developed country settings. Large randomized trials are recommended in both types of setting to rule out small effects on growth and to confirm the reported health benefits of exclusive breastfeeding for six months or beyond.

  45. Main results: Twenty independent studies meeting the selection criteria were identified by the literature search: nine from developing countries (two of which were controlled trials in Honduras) and 11 from developed countries (all observational studies). The two trials did not receive high methodologic quality ratings but were nonetheless superior to any of the observational studies included in this review. The observational studies were of variable quality; in addition, their nonexperimental designs were not able to exclude potential sources of confounding and selection bias. Definitions of exclusive breastfeeding varied considerably across studies. Neither the trials nor the observational studies suggest that infants who continue to be exclusively breastfed for six months show deficits in weight or length gain, although larger sample sizes would be required to rule out modest differences in risk of undernutrition. The data are conflicting with respect to iron status, but at least in developing country settings where newborn iron stores may be suboptimal, suggest that exclusive breastfeeding without iron supplementation through six months may compromise hematologic status. Based primarily on an observational analysis of a large randomized trial in Belarus, infants who continue exclusive breastfeeding for six months or more appear to have a significantly reduced risk of one or more episodes of gastrointestinal infection. No significant reduction in risk of atopic eczema, asthma, or other atopic outcomes has been demonstrated in studies from Finland, Australia, and Belarus. Data from the two Honduran trials suggest that exclusive breastfeeding through six months is associated with delayed resumption of menses and more rapid postpartum weight loss in the mother.

  46. 6. Epidural headache

  47. Epidural blood patching for preventing and treating post-dural puncture headache • Reviewers' conclusions: Further, adequately powered, randomised trials (including at least a few hundred patients) are required before reliable conclusions can be drawn about the role of epidural blood patching in the prevention and treatment of post-dural puncture headache.

  48. Main results: Three trials (77 patients) were eligible for inclusion. Methodological details were generally incomplete. Although the results of our analyses suggested that both prophylactic and therapeutic epidural blood patching may be of benefit, the very small numbers of patients and outcome events, as well as uncertainties about trial methodology, precluded reliable assessments of the potential benefits and harms of this intervention.

  49. 7. Smoking

  50. Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation • Reviewers' conclusions: All of the commercially available forms of NRT (nicotine gum, transdermal patch, the nicotine nasal spray, nicotine inhaler and nicotine sublingual tablets/lozenges) are effective as part of a strategy to promote smoking cessation. They increase quit rates approximately 1.5 to 2 fold regardless of setting. • The effectiveness of NRT appears to be largely independent of the intensity of additional support provided to the smoker. Provision of more intense levels of support, although beneficial in facilitating the likelihood of quitting, is not essential to the success of NRT. • There is promising evidence that bupropion may be more effective than NRT (either alone or in combination). However, its most appropriate place in the therapeutic armamentarium requires further study and consideration.

More Related