1 / 49

Ohio Department of Transportation

Ohio Department of Transportation. Statewide Investigation of Noise Abatement Alternatives. Overview. Noise in the Spotlight: History of ODOT Abatement Measures ODOT Noise Abatement Alternatives Study Mitigation Techniques : From Noise Source Along Noise Path

prema
Télécharger la présentation

Ohio Department of Transportation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Ohio Department of Transportation Statewide Investigation of Noise Abatement Alternatives

  2. Overview • Noise in the Spotlight: History of ODOT Abatement Measures • ODOT Noise Abatement Alternatives Study • Mitigation Techniques : • From Noise Source • Along Noise Path • At Noise Receivers • Through Planning Initiatives • Summary of Noise Mitigation Options • Conclusion

  3. Background • Mandated in Amended Substitute House Bill Number 66, Section 203.03.18 • Amendment offered by legislator from district adjacent to Ohio Turnpike – Interstate 80 • Ohio Turnpike Commission paid damages to original landowners to compensate for noise and added deed restriction

  4. Background • Later residential development resulted in noise impacts with no remedy - No Type I projects - Not eligible for Type II • Local business interest proposed noise cancellation technology

  5. Limitations • Ohio Revised Code (ORC) prohibits purchase of buffer zones • ORC requires consideration of “natural barriers” for all projects • Any new alternatives must satisfy FHWA and ODOT policies

  6. ODOT Noise Abatement Study: Investigation into Noise Abatement Alternatives

  7. ODOT Noise Abatement Study • Ohio Legislature established a requirement in 2006 “to perform a study of alternative soundproofing methods that could be used as an alternative to traditional sound barriers”. Source: Amended Substitute House Bill Number 66, Section 203.03.18 • The study investigates all potentially feasible and reasonable noise abatement alternatives available for use in the State of Ohio.

  8. Mitigation strategies and Techniques • From Noise Source • Along Noise Path • At Noise Receiver • Through Planning Initiatives

  9. Noise Source • Considered to represent an existing and/or planned highway corridor. • Noise emissions grouped into 3 categories: 1.Vehicles 2.Vehicle Operational Characteristics 3.Roadway Engineering Considerations

  10. Noise Source1.Vehicles • Engine/Power Train/Mechanical Noise • Exhaust Noise • Tire Noise • Engine Brake Noise

  11. Noise Source2.Vehicle Operational Characteristics • Speed Consideration • Reductions in Vehicle Volume • Modifications to Vehicle Composition and Reduced Truck Volumes • Other Traffic Calming Measures • Driver Behavior

  12. Noise Source Vehicle Operational Characteristics

  13. Noise Source Vehicle Operational Characteristics

  14. Noise Source3.Engineering Considerations • Alteration of Vertical/Horizontal Alignments • Reduced Grades • Tunnels • Pavement Considerations

  15. Noise SourceEngineering Considerations Alteration of Vertical/Horizontal Alignments

  16. Noise SourceEngineering Considerations Tunnels

  17. Noise SourceEngineering Considerations Pavement Considerations Quiet Pavement Pilot Program (QPPP) and Other Quiet Pavement Research -FHWA Requires participation in QPPP or research program to use alternate pavement as a form of noise mitigation

  18. Mitigation strategies and Techniques • From Noise Source • Along Noise Path • At Noise Receiver • Through Planning Initiatives

  19. Noise Path • Atmospheric Conditions • Geometric Spreading • Noise Barriers • Earth Berms • Buildings and Other Man-Made Objects • Vegetative Screening • Active Noise Cancellation

  20. Noise Barrier Attenuation Barrier Height Considerations

  21. Barrier Length and Flanking Noise Considerations

  22. Horizontal Placement of Barriers

  23. Absorptive Barrier Considerations

  24. Noise PathNoise Barriers • ODOT Standard Design/Criteria - Height – 8 to 20 ft., also addresses aesthetics. - Address concerns of local officials and the public. • Potential Benefits -ODOT minimum requirement is 5 dBA (feasible). • Anticipated Costs - Type 1 - $17.50/sq. foot Type 2- $20.00/sq. foot - $280-$320/ linear foot, assuming 16 foot height. • Land Acquisition for Construction of Noise Barriers - Establish easementson land beyond right-of-way.

  25. Land Acquisition for Construction of Barrier

  26. Earth Berms

  27. Noise PathBuildings and Other Man Made Objects • Buildings and other man-made objects • - Can shield noise from adjacent land uses. • - Reduction of 3 dBA for first row of homes and an • additional 1.5 dBA reduction for each additional row. • *Beyond the control of ODOT.

  28. Noise PathVegetative Screening Vegetative Screening - 100 foot corridor that obstructs the line-of-sitecan reduce noise 5 dBA, with 200 feet up to 10 dBA. *ODOT does include vegetative screening in its policy, but limits spending to $125/linear foot. *ODOT will consider vegetation for aesthetic reasons.

  29. Noise PathActive Noise Cancellation • Active Noise Cancellation • - Theory – Introduce identical sound wave exactly out of phase with the original wave. • - Multiple sources of noise in a 3-D application are • very difficult to monitor and replicate (out of phase). • - Not proven in real-world scenarios.

  30. Active Noise Cancellation

  31. Mitigation strategies and Techniques • From Noise Source • Along Noise Path • At Noise Receiver • Through Planning Initiatives

  32. Noise Receivers • Sound Insulation • Noise Masking

  33. Noise Receivers • Sound Insulation Examples: - Double pane windows - Central air conditioning - Solid-core doors Ohio Specific -Limited to special land uses (i.e. nonprofit Org.) -ODOT Noise Insulation Inspection Checklist -Have participated in past sound insulation projects ranging in cost from $11,000 to $65,000.

  34. Noise Receivers • Noise Masking Examples: - Water features -Music (“White Noise”) Site Specific - Limited effectiveness in very loud areas. -Reduce the “annoyance” of noise, rather than the volume of noise. -Available in exterior and interior situations.

  35. Mitigation strategies and Techniques • From Noise Source • Along Noise Path • At Noise Receiver • Through Planning Initiatives

  36. Planning Initiatives • Develop planning, zoning or other legal means (i.e. subdivision or development standards, building codes, health codes, or occupancy permits); • Municipal controls include land or easement purchases or the acceptance of land donations; • Community education programs to inform citizens, developers, and local planners of the option for structures and land uses that will be harmonious next to a highway; • Acoustical site planning, architectural design or acoustical construction.

  37. Planning Initiatives • Noise Compatible Land Use Planning a.Small Scale Noise Mitigation Strategies -Controlled by local municipality. - Proactive approach to planning. Examples: - Zoning for commercial/industrial land uses to be placed adjacent to highway corridors. - Buffer zones between highway corridors and noise-sensitive areas.

  38. Planning Initiatives b.Large Scale Noise Mitigation Strategies -Controlled and implemented at the local level with guidance and direction from states. - State and federal government offer assistance Examples: - Purchase of Development Rights (PDR) - Transfers of Development Rights (TDR) - Proponent Mitigated Development (PMD)

  39. Planning Initiatives • Roadway Noise Mitigation Programs - “Highly-Sensitive” vs. “Less-Sensitive” land uses. *Categorize individual land uses in zoning code -Perform inventory of existing and future noise levels. - Purpose: to limit development of “Highly-Sensitive” land uses in defined noise impact zones. * State DOT Responsibility

  40. Planning Initiatives • ODOT Initiatives - Has initiated noise compatible land use planning. - Working with the Miami Valley Regional Planning Commission (MVRPC) on a “four-phase” approach to promote these strategies. - Ex: I-675 corridor in Greene County, OH * Future development can be modified based on developed existing and future noise contours.

  41. Planning Initiatives • Acquisition of Land to Serve as a Buffer to Preempt Development - Federal funds can be used to acquire buffer zones adjacent to highway corridors. -Begins at the highway planning phase. -Improve aesthetics and roadway appearance. -Very costly mitigation option, but very effective. *Ohio Revised Code, § 5501.32limits ODOT’s ability to purchase lands and indicates the property may be purchased strictly for “highway purposes”.

  42. Summary of Noise Mitigation Options • Mitigation Technique • General Effectiveness • Monetary Costs • Conditions Where Feasible • Within the Control of the Department

  43. Conclusions • Wide range of alternatives • Some may not satisfy reasonable/feasible requirements - Cost - Permanence - Level of Commitment • Most useful methods - Noise Compatible Land Use Planning - Noise Barriers

  44. Questions and Answers

More Related