1 / 31

Accident case study: Libya

Accident case study: Libya. WARNING. THIS PRESENTATION INCLUDES IMAGES OF DEMINER INJURY. Background to the accident 1. Background to the accident 2. Background to the accident 3. Background to the accident 4. Background to the accident 5. Background to the accident 6.

preno
Télécharger la présentation

Accident case study: Libya

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Accident case study: Libya

  2. WARNING THIS PRESENTATION INCLUDES IMAGES OF DEMINER INJURY

  3. Background to the accident 1

  4. Background to the accident 2

  5. Background to the accident 3

  6. Background to the accident 4

  7. Background to the accident 5

  8. Background to the accident 6

  9. Background to the accident 7

  10. The accident 1

  11. The accident 2

  12. The accident 3

  13. The accident 4

  14. The accident 5

  15. The accident 6

  16. The accident 7

  17. The Victim’s injuries

  18. The Victim’s injuries 2

  19. Investigation

  20. UN Investigation 1

  21. UN investigation 2

  22. Inadequate SOPs?

  23. UN investigation conclusion

  24. UN investigation recommendations

  25. The MAC’s investigation

  26. Mine Action Centre overview

  27. Victim’s activity at the time

  28. Mine Action Centre overview

  29. Mine Action Centre overview 2

  30. Consequences

  31. Summing up • This is an example of an accident investigation in which the UN investigators had little or no relevant experience. They avoided drawing obvious conclusions and criticised the victim’s Explosive Ordnance Disposal training, suggesting that this aspect of his training was at fault. • They did not know about the organisation’s previous accident with the same mine, and ignored the damaged Leatherman hand tool at the accident site. • The causes reveal faults in staff preparation that needed to be addressed to ensure that unnecessary risks were not taken again.

More Related