1 / 23

Usability and Accessibility in BME Design

Usability and Accessibility in BME Design. Thomas Yen Ph.D Biomedical Engineering Dept. University of Wisconsin-Madison. Introduction. Usability and Accessibility can be addressed using Universal and Accessible Design principles by implementing Human Factors and Ergonomics techniques.

preno
Télécharger la présentation

Usability and Accessibility in BME Design

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Usability and Accessibility in BME Design Thomas Yen Ph.D Biomedical Engineering Dept. University of Wisconsin-Madison

  2. Introduction • Usability and Accessibility can be addressed using Universal and Accessible Design principles by implementing Human Factors and Ergonomics techniques. • Def - The process of designing products (devices, systems, environments, services, processes, etc.) so that they are as usable by people with the widest range of abilities and constraints as is commercially practical and profitable

  3. Introduction • Difficulty of use or access of Medical Devices • Human Factors and Ergonomics Issues for Health Care professionals • Applying the Principles of Universal Design to Medical Devices • Ergonomics and Usability Evaluation of Designs • Standards for Medical Devices • Design Examples

  4. Difficulty of use or access of Medical Devices • 2004 national consumer survey • 15 categories of equipment (exam tables, radiology, exercise and rehab, weight scales, • experience participants • rate the degree of difficulty or discomfort they experience when attempting to use or access the equipment (0-none to 4-impossible to use)

  5. Difficulty of use or access of Medical Devices

  6. Human Factors and Ergonomics Issues for Health Care Professionals • Medical Errors • Medication • Equipment-related • Physical Injuries - Patient-handling • Disabled and Aging Health Care Providers • Health care in the Home

  7. Applying the Principles of Universal Design (UD) to Medical Devices • Center for Universal Design, developed the principles of UD • Intended to guide the design process • Allowed the systematic evaluation of designs • Educate about the characteristics of more usable design solutions for diverse populations • Important to medical devices that are used by diverse user population that can affect safety and efficiency

  8. Principles of Universal Design • Principle 1: Equitable Use • Principle 2: Flexibility in Use • Principle 3: Simple and Intuitive • Principle 4: Perceptible Information • Principle 5: Tolerance for Error • Principle 6: Low Physical Effort • Principle 7: Size and Space for Approach and Use

  9. Principle 1: Equitable Use • Def: The design is useful and marketable to people with diverse abilities. • Guidelines: • 1a. Provide the same means of use for all users: identical whenever possible; equivalent when not. • 1b. Avoid segregating or stigmatizing any users. • 1c. Provisions for privacy, security, and safety should be equally available to all users. • 1d. Make the design appealing to all users.

  10. Principle 2: Flexibility of Use • Def: The design accommodates a wide range of individual preferences and abilities. • Guidelines: • 2a. Provide choice in methods of use. • 2b. Accommodate right- or left-handed access and use. • 2c. Facilitate the user's accuracy and precision. • 2d. Provide adaptability to the user's pace.

  11. Principle 3: Simple and Intuitive • Use of the design is easy to understand, regardless of the user's experience, knowledge, language skills, or current concentration level. • Guidelines: • 3a. Eliminate unnecessary complexity. • 3b. Be consistent with user expectations and intuition. • 3c. Accommodate a wide range of literacy and language skills. • 3d. Arrange information consistent with its importance. • 3e. Provide effective prompting and feedback during and after task completion.

  12. Principle 4: Perceptible Information • The design communicates necessary information effectively to the user, regardless of ambient conditions or the user's sensory abilities. • Guidelines: • 4a. Use different modes (pictorial, verbal, tactile) for redundant presentation of essential information. • 4b. Provide adequate contrast between essential information and its surroundings. • 4c. Maximize "legibility" of essential information. • 4d. Differentiate elements in ways that can be described (i.e., make it easy to give instructions or directions). • 4e. Provide compatibility with a variety of techniques or devices used by people with sensory limitations.

  13. Principle 5: Tolerance for Error • The design minimizes hazards and the adverse consequences of accidental or unintended actions. • Guidelines: • 5a. Arrange elements to minimize hazards and errors: most used elements, most accessible; hazardous elements eliminated, isolated, or shielded. • 5b. Provide warnings of hazards and errors. • 5c. Provide fail safe features. • 5d. Discourage unconscious action in tasks that require vigilance.

  14. Principle 6: Low Physical Effort • The design can be used efficiently and comfortably and with a minimum of fatigue. • Guidelines: • 6a. Allow user to maintain a neutral body position. • 6b. Use reasonable operating forces. • 6c. Minimize repetitive actions. • 6d. Minimize sustained physical effort.

  15. Principle 7: Size and Space for Approach and Use • Appropriate size and space is provided for approach, reach, manipulation, and use regardless of user's body size, posture, or mobility. • Guidelines: • 7a. Provide a clear line of sight to important elements for any seated or standing user. • 7b. Make reach to all components comfortable for any seated or standing user. • 7c. Accommodate variations in hand and grip size. • 7d. Provide adequate space for the use of assistive devices or personal assistance.

  16. Ergonomics and Usability Evaluation of Designs • Ergonomics Analysis • Human-Machine System • Goals • Machine and Tools • Human-Machine interaction • Environment • Humans • Task analysis • Usability Testing

  17. Standards for Medical Devices • Assoc. for the Advancement Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) • Anesthesia Delivery systems (late 70s) • AAMI-HE:1988, AAMI-HE48:1993 Human Factors Engineering Guidelines and Preferred Practices for the Design of Medical Devices. • ANSI/AAMI HE74:2001 – updated and replacement for AAMI HE48:1993

  18. Design Examples

  19. Design Examples

  20. Design Examples

  21. Courses in Human Factors • ISyE 349 Introduction to Human Factors • ISyE 549 Human Factors Engineering • ISyE 552 Human Factors Engineering Design and Evaluation (Special Topics) • ISyE 662 Design and Human Disability and Aging (Universal/Accessible Design) • ISyE 564 Occupational Ergonomics and Biomechanics

  22. Questions and References • Contact with questions • Thomas Yen, yen@engr.wisc.edu • Send me examples of bad design that you encounter. • Principles of Universal Design • http://www.design.ncsu.edu/cud/about_ud/udprinciplestext.htm • Examples of Bad Human Factors Design • http://www.baddesigns.com/index.shtml • Text: Medical Instrumentation – Accessibility and Usability Considerations, • J. M. Winters, M. F. Story, (editors), CRC Press, New York, 2007

More Related