1 / 17

Fife Peer Learning Project

Fife Peer Learning Project. Peter Tymms (Durham, Fife & Dundee). Outline. Why Peer Learning The Fife Peer Learning Project Why Scotland Confluence of Fife, Dundee and PIPS Peer Learning Overall plan Design Decisions at Authority Level Issues. Peer Learning.

priscilla-fox
Télécharger la présentation

Fife Peer Learning Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Fife Peer Learning Project Peter Tymms (Durham, Fife & Dundee)

  2. Outline • Why Peer Learning • The Fife Peer Learning Project • Why Scotland • Confluence of Fife, Dundee and PIPS • Peer Learning • Overall plan • Design • Decisions at Authority Level • Issues

  3. Peer Learning • Meta-analyses of pupil level RCTs generally positive • Effect Sizes of 0.4 to 0.8 • For mathematics and reading (and other attainment). • For social outcomes • For tutors and tutees • Across many ages groups

  4. Scotland • Well organised Authorities • No high stakes tests in primaries • No National Curriculum • Alignment with the aims of peer learning

  5. Fife • Next to Dundee’s Centre for Peer Learning • About 150 primary schools • Already doing PIPS in P1, P3, P5 and P7 • Enthusiastic Authority

  6. The Overall Plan • Run Peer Learning in schools for two years in reading and mathematics. • Use PIPS to check impact

  7. We know that .. Peer Learning is effective But • Can a whole Authority change together? • Which is best • Cross-age or Same-age? • Mix or separate subjects? • Intensive or light?

  8. Cross-age versus Same-age • Research suggests Cross-age works best But • It is hard to sustain and organise

  9. Mixing versus Separation • Learning skills in one context may help in another But • Research suggests that transfer is problematic

  10. Intensive or Light • Harder more intensive work might get better results But • Intense work can confuse and be onerous

  11. What data will we collect? • What Heads and Teachers say • What schools have done • Pupils’ • Progress • Attitudes • Home background, sex, age etc • Behaviour • From Fife primary schools and many others in Scotland

  12. Compare • Overall • Fife-in-the-future with Fife-in-the-past • Fife with other authorities • Specifically for reading and maths • Cross-age with same-age • Separate and mixed approaches • Intensive and light approaches

  13. Factorial Design • Cross age vs same age • Maths versus reading versus both • Intensive versus light

  14. Allocation for forms of peer learning • 120 schools agreed to be randomly assigned • A few more have since agreed • Details of procedure in paper.

  15. Strategic Authority Decisions • Commitment • Funding • Ethics • School Support • Parental support • Councillors • Timing

  16. So far • The project is running • A few schools have backed away from random allocation • Project is running enthusiastically • Exploratory data collected soon • Fingers crossed.

  17. Issues • Getting the project going • Idea to implementation took years • Coordination of three groups • Persuading schools • Leekage • Maintaining momentum • What are we evaluating?

More Related