How Randomized Controlled Trials are Used in Meta-Analysis

1. How Randomized Controlled Trials are Used in Meta- Analysis An Academic presentation by Dr. Nancy Agnes, Head, Technical Operations, Pubrica Group: www.pubrica.com Email: sales@pubrica.com

2. Introduction Randomized controlled trials—for efficacy research Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are prospective studies that assess the efficacy of a novel intervention or treatment. Although no research is likely to show causation, randomization eliminates bias and provides a rigorous technique for examining cause-effect correlations between an intervention and result. This is because the process of randomization balances participant characteristics (both observable and unobserved) between groups, allowing any variations in result to be attributed to the research intervention. This is not achievable with any other research design.

3. RCTs are Used in Meta-Analysis Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) are a commonly used research design in medical and scientific studies to assess the effectiveness of interventions or treatments. Meta-analysis, on the other hand, is a statistical technique used to combine and analyze the results of multiple studies on a particular topic to draw more robust conclusions. To know more about meta-analysis services, check our study guide on How to do a meta-analysis for a manuscript.

5. Here's how RCTs are used in the context of meta-analysis Inclusion Criteria Researchers establish specific inclusion and exclusion criteria to determine which RCTs are eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Common criteria might include the type of intervention, the patient population, the outcome measures, and the study design. 1 Identifying Relevant RCTs The first step in a meta-analysis is to identify all relevant RCTs that have been conducted on a specific topic. This is typically systematic literature review, where researchers search various databases and sources to find all available RCTs. 2 done through a

6. Effect Size Calculation One of the key steps in meta-analysis is calculating the effect size for each RCT. The effect size is a measure of the magnitude of the treatment effect, and it allows for the comparison of results across different studies. Common effect size measures include odds ratios, risk ratios, or mean differences, depending on the type of data and outcome being studied. 3 Data Extraction For each eligible RCT, relevant data is extracted. This includes information about the study design, sample size, treatment group, control group, and the results in terms of the outcome of interest. This data collection is typically recorded in a standardized format. 4

7. Statistical Analysis: Meta-analysis techniques to combine the effect sizes from individual RCTs. method is to use a weighted average of the effect sizes, where the weights are determined by the study's sample size and quality. employs statistical 5 A common Weighting Studies In a meta-analysis, not all studies are given equal importance. Larger studies or those with a lower risk of bias may be given more weight in the analysis. This helps ensure that the results of higher- quality studies have a greater influence on the overall findings. 6

8. Publication Bias Assessment Publication bias occurs when studies with positive results are more likely to be published, leading to an overestimation of the treatment effect. Meta-analysts often assess for publication bias and attempt to correct it. 7 Heterogeneity Assessment Researchers assess the heterogeneity of the included RCTs to determine how much variability exists between the studies. This is important because high heterogeneity may reliability of the meta-analysis results. 8 impact the

9. Reporting and Publication 9 The findings of the meta-analysis are typically reported in a scientific paper or a report, and they may be subject to peer review and academic journals. publication in Interpretation of Results The interpreted estimate of the treatment effect, along with a measure of uncertainty (e.g., a confidence interval). This synthesis of evidence from multiple RCTs allows for a more comprehensive and reliable assessment of efficacy. meta-analysis to results an are provide overall 10 Check our Examples to get an understanding of our adaptability across meta-analysis topics and subject domains. the intervention's

10. About Pubrica Pubrica has extensive experience in conducting meta-analysis, a quantitative, formal, epidemiological study design used to systematically assess the results of previous research to derive conclusions about that body of research. Pubrica's team of researchers and authors develop Scientific and medical research papers that can act as an indispensable tool to the practitioner/authors. Pubrica medical writers help you to write and edit the introduction by introducing the reader to the shortcomings or empty spaces in the identified research field. Our experts are aware of the structure that follows the broad topic, the problem, and the background and advance to a narrow topic to state the hypothesis.

11. Contact Us UNITED KINGDOM +44 1618186353 INDIA +91-9884350006 EMAIL sales@pubrica.com