How to Evaluate a Scientific Manuscript in a High Impact Journal | Research

1. Pubrica Lab Pubrica Lab PROCESS OF A SCIENTIFIC MANUSCRIPT EVALUATION IN A HIGH-IMPACT JOURNAL What Matter’s for Editors & Peer reviewers

2. Pubrica Lab Pubrica Lab “Without proper evaluation failure is inevitable,” As per the above saying, it is vital to evaluate the manuscripts. Only by the process of manuscript evaluation, it could be more readable. It is a useful precursor for the publishing of the manuscript. What is a manuscript evaluation? A manuscript evaluation is an in-depth, developmental, and structural manuscript editing report. It provides a bigger picture of the manuscript by deeply analyzing of its many facts. 2 | Process of a scientific manuscript evaluation in a high-impact Journal

3. Pubrica Lab IMPORTANT FACTS THAT COVERS ALL MANUSCRIPT VALUATIONS Structure & Organization: 01 The structure of the manuscript should be as per the authors guidelines and also for easy read- ing and understanding. The organization will enhance the comprehension of the manuscript to prove the responsibility of the researcher in providing effective research and manuscript. Each paragraph should be able to stand alone, and yet provide context to what precedes it and what follows it. The most common convention for scientific manuscripts paper follows the format: Introduction (literature review), Methods, Results, Discussion, Acknowledgements, References, Tables and Figures. Exposition: 02 It reveals the important references (citations) and background information used for the Scientific research. Clarity of ideas: 03 The manuscript should have clarity, brevity, and logic in the way the question arrives, methods used to solve it, and the conclusions. Use simple language and observe the rules of good gram- mar, linguistic style, punctuation and spelling. Point of View: 04 The manuscript should have a clear point of view of the research and should be proceeding within the perspective of the research at all times of manuscript writing . Avoid irrelevant infor- mation, no matter how strongly you like it. 3 | Process of a scientific manuscript evaluation in a high-impact Journal

4. Pubrica Lab PROCESS OF MANUSCRIPT EVALUATION IN JOURNALS • journals want to publish novel findings that have a major impact on the field and not confirmatory studies. This is what defines high priority. Therefore, a better approach is to judge the quality of your work and target the most suitable journal. • Check word count, formatting, tables, and figures and media. • Do not submit it two journals simultaneously, which is a serious offense in academia. • Once you identify and submit it to the right journal, the author gets an acknowledgement after submission of the manuscript for evaluation. If it is not received after a few days of submitting the manuscript, it is advisable to check with the authorities in time. Choosing a suitable journal is one of the most important aspect and requires considerable skill. High impact • journal and assess your manuscript in terms of cover letter, abstract, and the gist of the discussion. Unless the manuscript is very poor, will assign it an associate editor and the main decision at that stage is to reject it without external peer review or required to send it out for review. Next, the manuscript is checked by the Editor-in-chief (EIC), whether it fits into the aim and scope of the • The next is the plagiarism check for the similarity of the article with any previously published or other articles. • • sections. It will include methods, arguments, conclusions, results among many others as per the Scientific research. It is then evaluated by peer reviewers as an essential process to guarantee its scientific validity. Only on a positive report from the peer reviews, the manuscripts are taken for further evaluations of the other 4 | Process of a scientific manuscript evaluation in a high-impact Journal

5. Pubrica Lab MEQ Questions that arise during the process of evaluation • important) question of the manuscript? What is the research (e.g., is it clinically • ing the manuscript research? Will the other researchers show interest in read • (e.g., define mechanism and not merely do a de scriptive confirmatory type) on why the question is vital? Does the manuscript make a good argument • study? What kind of researchers will be interested in the • journal’s audiences? Are the interested researchers will be part of the • such as a double blinded randomized placebo controlled parallel group, endpoint, sample size) adopted by the researcher to answer the ques tion? What are the methods (e.g., sound study design • pects? Does the manuscript fit well together in all as • what the results mean to the field? Is the manuscript clear in its research and to • viable? Is the strategy of the used methods correct and • English and without any grammatical mistakes? Is the manuscript written well using impeccable • Are there any major issues with the methods? • sound and superior for easy readability and understanding? Is the language written in the manuscript is • ments that could be suitable for answering the question or improving the quality of the manu script? Are there any better methods, data, and experi • above facts evaluated and the questions answered will get more chances of being pub lished in reputed and renowned journals. The process of manuscript evaluation with all the • correctly? Were the conclusions analyzed and interpreted • conclusions? What is the evidence provided in proof of the • field in some way? Does the numbers match? Will the results help in advancing the concerned • are up to the standards of the journal? Does the importance of the advances in the field 5 | Process of a scientific manuscript evaluation in a high-impact Journal

6. Pubrica Lab ABOUT US Pubrica Scientific Writing & Publication offers comprehensive medical, scientific, technical, and business writing services. We offer an array of writing services: man- uscript writing, regulatory writing, Clinical Report Form (CRF) writing, biostatistical report writing, academic and business writing, physician writing, medical writing and more. Subject-Matter Experts (SMEs) in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM), and pundits with therapeutic repertoire. Publishing that medical paper or getting a regulatory drug approval is now easy. We assist you in every phase of your project. Save time and money through our support; Contact us through +91 9884350006. © 2019 Pubrica. All Rights Reserved. No part of this document should be modified/used without prior consent. UK: 10 Park Place, Manchester M4 4EY UK: +44-1143520021 Email:sales@pubrica.com Web:www.pubrica.com