1 / 8

Pre-Impact Test of Low-Income MUP and Pop-HPSA

Pre-Impact Test of Low-Income MUP and Pop-HPSA. Assessment of Population-Specific Scoring of Barriers and ATP. Methods. % Non-White – using the % non-white amongst the poor as a proxy (ACS) % Hispanic – using the % Hispanic amongst the poor as a proxy (ACS)

qiana
Télécharger la présentation

Pre-Impact Test of Low-Income MUP and Pop-HPSA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Pre-Impact Test of Low-Income MUP and Pop-HPSA Assessment of Population-Specific Scoring of Barriers and ATP

  2. Methods • % Non-White – using the % non-white amongst the poor as a proxy (ACS) • % Hispanic – using the % Hispanic amongst the poor as a proxy (ACS) • % Uninsured – Using ACS ratio of uninsurance for those <200% FPL to uninsurance for those <400% FPL within each state • ATP scored at 100 (all Low Income are Low Income) • P2P, Health Status, and other Barriers remain at the overall community level • Scales and thresholds remain unchanged

  3. Influence of Barriers and ATP • MUP: Barriers and ATP weight = 60 of 100 points • Designation threshold = 54.3 • Pop-HPSA: ATP = 50 of 100 points in mid range • Designation threshold = maximum of 80 with most of the range below that (down to 0)

  4. Results on Low Income MUP Pre-Index

  5. Results on HPSA-MidRange Pre-Index

  6. Low Income pre-Scoring Results MUP: • 93% of Universal RSAs designated before any adjustment for low-income health status or access • 90% of total pop, 94% of low income pop nationally • Likely that most or all remaining would qualify once P2P and other factors were determined for the low income pop • 15% of areas designated will designate on demographics only, regardless of P2P/Health Status factors • 87% of areas not qualifying as an MUA would qualify via this MUP method Pop HPSA: • 69% of areas in mid range designate (vs 28% without change) • Areas in/out due to high/low P2P alone are unchanged due to no P2P update • Many more areas will fall into mid- or P2P-Only designation range once low income P2P is assessed

  7. Considerations • Scales still fit the range of values • Different factors/variables would get ‘full scoring’ for different populations • Dropping factors/variables would leave a ‘gap’ in the scoring – would need to reweight remaining factors • Reweighting could reduce impact but not eliminate underlying scoring issues • Adjusting threshold would lead to a different threshold value for every population group • No data to make threshold assessment • Current methods score ‘risk’ at the community level only for MUP, and not for Pop.HPSA

More Related